Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

Refine by population, intervention, comparison or outcome
More filters
Evidence found and GRADE certainty

46 questions · 46 findings · 8 reviews

No studies found 9 · 19.6%GRADE not reported 7 · 15.2%Very low 11 · 23.9%Low 13 · 28.3%Moderate 4 · 8.7%High 2 · 4.3%

Patient education and standard care vs usual care

Flare‐ups or relapse (4‐12 months) (dichotomous outcome) · people with inflammatory bowel disease

It is very uncertain whether patient education and standard care changes flare‐ups or relapse (4‐12 months) (dichotomous outcome) compared with standard care (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Technology‐mediated psychoeducation + standard care intervention vs usual care

Global state: not improved ‐ short‐term GAF · schizophrenia

Technology‐mediated psychoeducation + standard care intervention showed no clear difference in global state: not improved ‐ short‐term GAF compared with standard care intervention (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Technology‐mediated psychoeducation + standard care intervention vs usual care

Knowledge/insight: not improved ITAQ · schizophrenia

Technology‐mediated psychoeducation + standard care intervention showed no clear difference in knowledge/insight: not improved ITAQ compared with standard care intervention (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Technology‐mediated psychoeducation + standard care intervention vs usual care

Compliance/satisfaction: medication ‐ not compliant ‐ long‐term · schizophrenia

It is very uncertain whether technology‐mediated psychoeducation + standard care intervention changes compliance/satisfaction: medication ‐ not compliant ‐ long‐term compared with standard care intervention (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Technology‐mediated psychoeducation + standard care intervention vs usual care

Clinical response: no clinically significant response in mental state · schizophrenia

Technology‐mediated psychoeducation + standard care intervention showed no clear difference in mental state: not improved ‐ short‐term BPRS compared with standard care intervention (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Primary care physician alerting system and a patient‐directed intervention (education and reminder to see their primary care physician) vs usual care

Bone mineral density · General practitioners/family doctors involved in the management of patients with osteoporosis

Primary care physician alerting system and a patient‐directed… leads to higher bone Mineral Density 1 compared with standard care (high certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Primary care physician alerting system and a patient‐directed intervention (education and reminder to see their primary care physician) vs usual care

Osteoporosis medication 2 · General practitioners/family doctors involved in the management of patients with osteoporosis

Primary care physician alerting system and a patient‐directed… leads to higher osteoporosis medication 2 compared with standard care (high certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Standard pressure ulcer education and monthly mail or telephone follow‐up, vs standard pressure ulcer education and quarterly mail or telephone follow‐up,

Proportion of participants developing a new ulcer · s

It is very uncertain whether standard pressure ulcer education and monthly mail or telephone… changes proportion of participants developing a new ulcer (24 months) compared with standard pressure ulcer education and quarterly mail or telephone… (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review