Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

Refine by population, intervention, comparison or outcome
More filters
Evidence found and GRADE certainty

44 questions · 45 findings · 12 reviews · Effective Practice and Organisation of Care

No studies found 7 · 15.6%GRADE not reported 2 · 4.4%Very low 5 · 11.1%Low 13 · 28.9%Moderate 17 · 37.8%High 1 · 2.2%

Primary objective: mobile stock notification with effective product transport vs usual care

Provider acceptability and satisfaction (Proportion of participants who reported using the digital intervention) · healthcare workers and other health professionals involved in commodity and stock management
1 finding from 1 review

Primary objective: mobile stock notification with enhanced management vs usual care

Provider acceptability and satisfaction (Proportion of participants who reported using the digital intervention) · healthcare workers and other health professionals involved in commodity and stock management
1 finding from 1 review

Mobile technologies for use in the emergency department vs usual care

Participant and provider acceptability or satisfaction · Emergency physicians consulting with hospital specialists about adults attending the emergency department

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Mobile technologies used by community health or home‐care workers vs usual care

Participant and provider acceptability or satisfaction · Community‐based peer health workers consulting with clinic staff about receiving antiretroviral therapy, community nurses consulting with…

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Mobile technologies used by primary care providers to consult with a hospital‐based specialist vs usual care

Patient satisfaction and acceptability · Primary care providers consulting with dermatologists (6 studies), ophthalmologists (2 studies), radiologists (1 study), nephrologists (1…

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Mobile clinics vs static clinics

Health behaviour: self‐reported mammography uptake ( · women aged 60 to 84 years at study entry. (Age of participants matches our selection criteria)

Mobile clinics may leads to higher health behaviour: self‐reported mammography uptake ( compared with static clinics (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Capitation remuneration vs Fee-for-service remuneration

Unintended effects: self-reported temptation to under-prescribe (0- to 100-point visual analogue scale) · Children (0- to 15-year-olds) undergoing routine continuing dental care at 354 dental practices, in matched pairs of Health Service…

Capitation remuneration showed no clear difference in unintended effects: self-reported temptation to under-prescribe (0-… compared with fee-for-service remuneration; GRADE not reported.

1 finding from 1 review

Capitation remuneration vs Fee-for-service remuneration

Unintended effects: self-reported temptation to over-prescribe (0- to 100-point visual analogue scale) · Children (0- to 15-year-olds) undergoing routine continuing dental care at 354 dental practices, in matched pairs of Health Service…

Capitation remuneration showed no clear difference in unintended effects: self-reported temptation to over-prescribe (0-… compared with fee-for-service remuneration; GRADE not reported.

1 finding from 1 review

Intervention not reported

Finding 19: social exclusion. Some parents, predominantly from LMICs, were less accepting of childhood vaccination due to their experiences of social exclusion. Social exclusion may involve economic disadvantage, residential segregation, a lack of... · groups. Numerous parents characterised infants and young children as weak and vulnerable, and in need of protection against multiple…
1 finding from 1 review

Intervention not reported

Quality of care: adherence to evidence‐based recommendations during hospital admission · health professionals providing care to patients with stroke

It is very uncertain whether the intervention changes quality of care: adherence to evidence‐based recommendations during… (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Intervention not reported

Quality of care: proportion of patients with ischaemic stroke who receive thrombolysis (first 24 hours of admission) · health professionals providing care to patients with stroke

The intervention showed no clear difference in quality of care: proportion of patients with ischaemic stroke who… (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Intervention not reported

Quality of care: proportion of patients who receive a swallow screen within 24 hours of admission · health professionals providing care to patients with stroke

The intervention probably leads to higher quality of care: proportion of patients who receive a swallow screen… (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Intervention not reported

Patient outcome: death, disability or dependency at 90 days · health professionals providing care to patients with stroke

The intervention showed no clear difference in patient outcome: death, disability or dependency at 90 days (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Implementation interventions vs no intervention

Quality of care: healthcare professional adherence to EBP at 12 months · healthcare professionals providing stroke rehabilitation

It is very uncertain whether implementation interventions changes quality of care: healthcare professional adherence to EBP at 12 months compared with no intervention (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Implementation interventions vs no intervention

Patient adherence to recommended treatment: number of outdoor journeys per week at 6 months · healthcare professionals providing stroke rehabilitation

Implementation interventions showed no clear difference in patient adherence to recommended treatment: number of outdoor… compared with no intervention (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Implementation interventions vs no intervention

HRQoL at 6 or 12 months · healthcare professionals providing stroke rehabilitation

Implementation interventions showed no clear difference in patient health status: HRQoL (EQ‐5D: –0.59 to 1, higher score… compared with no intervention (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Implementation interventions vs no intervention

Patient health status: ADL (Barthel Index, 0–20, higher score = better) at up to 6 months · healthcare professionals providing stroke rehabilitation

Implementation interventions showed no clear difference in patient health status: ADL (Barthel Index, 0–20, higher score =… compared with no intervention (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review