Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

Refine by population, intervention, comparison or outcome
More filters
Evidence found and GRADE certainty

38 questions · 38 findings · 7 reviews

No studies found 30 · 78.9%GRADE not reported 3 · 7.9%Very low 3 · 7.9%Low 1 · 2.6%Moderate 1 · 2.6%High 0 · 0%

Repeat midurethral tape (any type) vs any other non‐tape surgical treatment (e.g. traditional sling, colposuspension, injectables)

Objective cure rates in the longer‐term ‐ more than 12 months, · women with recurrent stress urinary incontinence after failed minimally invasive midurethral tape surgery

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Repeat midurethral tape (any type) vs any other non‐tape surgical treatment (e.g. traditional sling, colposuspension, injectables)

General health status evaluation e.g. Short Form (SF)‐36 ‐ not reported · women with recurrent stress urinary incontinence after failed minimally invasive midurethral tape surgery

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Repeat midurethral tape (any type) vs any other non‐tape surgical treatment (e.g. traditional sling, colposuspension, injectables)

Condition‐specific instruments designed to assess incontinence ‐ e.g. BFLUTS · women with recurrent stress urinary incontinence after failed minimally invasive midurethral tape surgery

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Repeat midurethral tape (any type) vs any other non‐tape surgical treatment (e.g. traditional sling, colposuspension, injectables)

Adverse events · women with recurrent stress urinary incontinence after failed minimally invasive midurethral tape surgery

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

One type of repeat midurethral tape vs another type of repeat midurethral tape

Objective cure rates in the longer‐term ‐ more than 12 months, · women with recurrent stress urinary incontinence after failed minimally invasive midurethral tape surgery

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

One type of repeat midurethral tape vs another type of repeat midurethral tape

General health status evaluation e.g. Short Form (SF)‐36 ‐ not reported · women with recurrent stress urinary incontinence after failed minimally invasive midurethral tape surgery

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Low‐dose adjuvant radiotherapy vs standard‐dose adjuvant radiotherapy

Voice (Voice Handicap Index) · patients with HPV‐positive oropharyngeal carcinoma who have received minimally invasive transoral surgery

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Standard‐dose adjuvant radiotherapy alone vs adjuvant chemoradiotherapy

Voice (Voice Handicap Index) · patients with HPV‐positive oropharyngeal carcinoma who have received minimally invasive transoral surgery

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Single‐incision slings vs retropubic minimally‐invasive slings

Number of women requiring repeat continence surgery or mesh revision · women with urinary incontinence

It is very uncertain whether single‐incision slings changes number of women requiring repeat continence surgery or mesh revision compared with retropubic minimally‐invasive slings (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Single‐incision slings vs transobturator minimally‐invasive slings

Number of women requiring repeat continence surgery or mesh revision · women with urinary incontinence

Single‐incision slings showed no clear difference in number of women requiring repeat continence surgery or mesh revision compared with transobturator minimally‐invasive slings (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Endometrial resection or ablation vs minimally invasive hysterectomy

Requirement for further surgery for treatment failure within 1 year after surgery · heavy menstrual bleeding

Endometrial resection or ablation probably leads to higher requirement for further surgery for treatment failure within 1 year… compared with minimally invasive hysterectomy (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review