Question · asked by 1 review

Endometrial resection or ablation vs minimally invasive hysterectomy: Requirement for further surgery for treatment failure within 1 year after surgery

Endometrial resection or ablation probably leads to higher requirement for further surgery for treatment failure within 1 year… compared with minimally invasive hysterectomy (moderate certainty).

What each review found

Include earlier review versions
FindingEffectStudiesGRADE certainty
Endometrial resection or ablation vs minimally invasive hysterectomy
Requirement for further surgery for treatment failure within 1 year after surgery · heavy menstrual bleeding
Endometrial resection or ablation probably leads to higher requirement for further surgery for treatment failure within 1 year… compared with minimally invasive hysterectomy (moderate certainty).
Endometrial resection and ablation versus hysterectomy for heavy menstrual bleeding (2021) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 7.7 [2.54, 23.32]4 studies · 922 participantsModerate

Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.

The reviews

ReviewSearched up toIncluded studiesAMSTAR 2
Endometrial resection and ablation versus hysterectomy for heavy menstrual bleeding
2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
Not reportedlist not extracted yetNot assessed

Studies behind the findings

None of these reviews ties its included studies to this outcome in the data here. Cochrane reviews and reviews with headline outcomes only do not list their studies yet.

How reviews are matched to this question

Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.