Overall survival · patients with small‐volume primary oropharyngeal carcinoma
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Locoregional control · patients with small‐volume primary oropharyngeal carcinoma
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Progression‐free survival · patients with small‐volume primary oropharyngeal carcinoma
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Gastrostomy rate (at 1 year) · patients with small‐volume primary oropharyngeal carcinoma
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Tracheostomy rate · patients with small‐volume primary oropharyngeal carcinoma
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Swallowing function (MDADI) · patients with small‐volume primary oropharyngeal carcinoma
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Quality of life (EORTC QLQ‐C30 and H&N35) · patients with small‐volume primary oropharyngeal carcinoma
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Repeat surgery for urinary incontinence · women with recurrent stress urinary incontinence after failed minimally invasive midurethral tape surgery
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Operating time
1 finding from 1 review
Number of women whose incontinence was improved or cured ‐ · women with recurrent stress urinary incontinence after failed minimally invasive midurethral tape surgery
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Objective cure rates in the longer‐term ‐ more than 12 months, · women with recurrent stress urinary incontinence after failed minimally invasive midurethral tape surgery
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
General health status evaluation e.g. Short Form (SF)‐36 ‐ not reported · women with recurrent stress urinary incontinence after failed minimally invasive midurethral tape surgery
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Condition‐specific instruments designed to assess incontinence ‐ e.g. BFLUTS · women with recurrent stress urinary incontinence after failed minimally invasive midurethral tape surgery
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Adverse events · women with recurrent stress urinary incontinence after failed minimally invasive midurethral tape surgery
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Repeat surgery for urinary incontinence · women with recurrent stress urinary incontinence after failed minimally invasive midurethral tape surgery
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Repeat surgery for urinary incontinence · women with recurrent stress urinary incontinence after failed minimally invasive midurethral tape surgery
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Intervention not reported
Minimally invasive step‐up approach: planned surgery vs. continued percutaneous drainage · people with necrotising pancreatitis
It is very uncertain whether the intervention changes minimally invasive step‐up approach: planned surgery vs. continued… (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
OR 21 [0.64, 689.99]
1 study · 8 participants
Very low
Number of women whose incontinence was improved or cured ‐ · women with recurrent stress urinary incontinence after failed minimally invasive midurethral tape surgery
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Condition‐specific instruments designed to assess incontinence ‐ e.g. BFLUTS · women with recurrent stress urinary incontinence after failed minimally invasive midurethral tape surgery
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
46 participants
GRADE not reported
Adverse events · women with recurrent stress urinary incontinence after failed minimally invasive midurethral tape surgery
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
46 participants
GRADE not reported