Cochrane · systematic review · CD010963
Minimally invasive surgery versus radiotherapy/chemoradiotherapy for small‐volume primary oropharyngeal carcinoma
Howard, J, Masterson, L, Dwivedi, RC, et al. · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · 2016 · Cochrane Library
ENTAMSTAR 2: not assessed
SoF tableOnly the outcomes this review put in its Summary of Findings table are listed (the Cochrane Handbook caps them at about seven per comparison). Its other analyses are not shown here.
Questions
7
current version
GRADE rated
0
No studies
7
Included studies
NR
No studies 7 · 100%Ungraded 0 · 0%Very low 0 · 0%Low 0 · 0%Moderate 0 · 0%High 0 · 0%
Ungraded means an effect was reported without a GRADE rating; it is not a gap. No studies means the review found nothing to answer the question. The six categories are a display order, not a score.
Questions and results
Minimally invasive surgery versus radiotherapy/chemoradiotherapy for small‐volume primary oropharyngeal carcinoma
Population: patients with small‐volume primary oropharyngeal carcinoma
| Outcome | Effect | Evidence | Status / GRADE |
|---|---|---|---|
Overall survival Minimally invasive surgery vs radiotherapy/chemoradiotherapy | no estimate extracted | NR | No studies |
Locoregional control Minimally invasive surgery vs radiotherapy/chemoradiotherapy | no estimate extracted | NR | No studies |
Progression‐free survival Minimally invasive surgery vs radiotherapy/chemoradiotherapy | no estimate extracted | NR | No studies |
Gastrostomy rate (at 1 year) Minimally invasive surgery vs radiotherapy/chemoradiotherapy | no estimate extracted | NR | No studies |
Tracheostomy rate Minimally invasive surgery vs radiotherapy/chemoradiotherapy | no estimate extracted | NR | No studies |
Swallowing function (MDADI) Minimally invasive surgery vs radiotherapy/chemoradiotherapy | no estimate extracted | NR | No studies |
Quality of life (EORTC QLQ‐C30 and H&N35) Minimally invasive surgery vs radiotherapy/chemoradiotherapy | no estimate extracted | NR | No studies |