Incidence of renal impairment · critically ill participants with ALI and ARDS
INO leads to higher renal impairment compared with control group (high certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Live birth · subfertile women with polycystic ovary syndrome
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Adverse events ‐ Miscarriage · subfertile women with polycystic ovary syndrome
It is very uncertain whether myo‐inositol changes adverse event ‐ miscarriage compared with D‐chiro‐inositol (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Adverse event ‐ multiple pregnancy · subfertile women with polycystic ovary syndrome
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Clinical pregnancy · subfertile women with polycystic ovary syndrome
It is very uncertain whether myo‐inositol changes clinical pregnancy compared with D‐chiro‐inositol (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Ovulation · subfertile women with polycystic ovary syndrome
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Resolution of ear discharge (1 to 2 weeks) Quinolones · chronic suppurative otitis media
Topical antibiotics (quinolones) probably leads to higher resolution of ear discharge (1 to 2 weeks) Quinolones compared with boric acid (moderate certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Disability Long‐term (≥ 12 months) Disability scores converted to 0 to 100 scale to allow for comparison of different disability scales (RMDQ, ODI, JOA) · patients with lumbar stenosis
It is very uncertain whether summary of findings: bilateral laminotomy changes standardized Disability Index (0 to 100) Bilateral laminotomy… compared with conventional laminectomy (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Satisfactory recovery Bilateral laminotomy compared with conventional laminectomy Satisfactory recovery was defined as 'good' or 'excellent' self‐perceived recovery · patients with lumbar stenosis
Summary of findings: bilateral laminotomy may leads to higher satisfactory recovery Bilateral laminotomy compared with… compared with conventional laminectomy (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
VAS leg (0 to 10) Bilateral laminotomy compared with conventional laminectomy · patients with lumbar stenosis
It is very uncertain whether summary of findings: bilateral laminotomy changes VAS leg (0 to 10) Bilateral laminotomy compared with conventional… compared with conventional laminectomy (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
VAS back (0 to 10) Unilateral laminotomy compared with conventional laminectomy · patients with lumbar stenosis
Summary of findings: bilateral laminotomy showed no clear difference in VAS back (0 to 10) Unilateral laminotomy compared with conventional… compared with conventional laminectomy (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
VAS back (0 to 10) Unilateral laminotomy compared with conventional laminectomy · patients with lumbar stenosis
It is very uncertain whether summary of findings: unilateral laminotomy changes VAS back (0 to 10) Unilateral laminotomy compared with conventional… compared with conventional laminectomy (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Disability Long‐term (≥ 12 months) Disability scores converted to 0 to 100 scale to allow for comparison of different disability scales (RMDQ, ODI, JOA) · patients with lumbar stenosis
Summary of findings: unilateral laminotomy showed no clear difference in standardised Disability Index (0 to 100) Unilateral laminotomy… compared with conventional laminectomy (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Satisfactory recovery Bilateral laminotomy compared with conventional laminectomy Satisfactory recovery was defined as 'good' or 'excellent' self‐perceived recovery · patients with lumbar stenosis
Summary of findings: unilateral laminotomy showed no clear difference in satisfactory recovery Unilateral laminotomy compared with… compared with conventional laminectomy (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
VAS leg (0 to 10) Unilateral laminotomy compared with conventional laminectomy · patients with lumbar stenosis
Summary of findings: unilateral laminotomy showed no clear difference in VAS leg (0 to 10) Unilateral laminotomy compared with conventional… compared with conventional laminectomy (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Disability Long‐term (≥ 12 months) Disability scores converted to 0 to 100 scale to allow for comparison of different disability scales (RMDQ, ODI, JOA) · patients with lumbar stenosis
Summary of findings: split‐spinous process laminotomy showed no clear difference in standardised Disability Index (0 to 100) Split‐spinous process… compared with conventional laminectomy (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Satisfactory recovery Bilateral laminotomy compared with conventional laminectomy Satisfactory recovery was defined as 'good' or 'excellent' self‐perceived recovery · patients with lumbar stenosis
Summary of findings: split‐spinous process laminotomy led to lower satisfactory recovery Split‐spinous process laminotomy compared with… compared with conventional laminectomy; GRADE not reported.
1 finding from 1 review
VAS leg (0 to 10) Split‐spinous process laminotomy compared with conventional laminectomy · patients with lumbar stenosis
It is very uncertain whether summary of findings: split‐spinous process laminotomy changes VAS leg (0 to 10) Split‐spinous process laminotomy compared with… compared with conventional laminectomy (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
VAS back (0 to 10) Unilateral laminotomy compared with conventional laminectomy · patients with lumbar stenosis
It is very uncertain whether summary of findings: split‐spinous process laminotomy changes VAS back (0 to 10) Unilateral laminotomy compared with conventional… compared with conventional laminectomy (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Studies with gastric cancer participants in addition to eligible participants · palliative participants with esophageal and GE‐junction carcinoma or gastric carcinoma
Summary of findings table (sensitivity analysis): interventions… showed no clear difference in studies with gastric cancer participants in addition to eligible… compared with gastric carcinoma; GRADE not reported.
1 finding from 1 review