Adherence · people with burn wounds likely to develop hypertrophic scarring
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Proportion of participants developing a new pressure ulcer · individuals at risk of pressure ulcer development
It is very uncertain whether other dressing changes pressure ulcer incidence: adhesive foam dressing vs no dressing compared with control (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Adhesion or scar formation · people undergoing surgery involving major abdominal incisions
1 finding from 1 review
Scar severity assessed by health professionals · people with hypertrophic scars
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Scar severity validated by participants · people with hypertrophic scars
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Adverse events · people with hypertrophic scars
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Pain assessed by modified VSS (unclear scale) · people with hypertrophic scars
1 finding from 1 review
Adherence · people with hypertrophic scars
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Health‐related quality of life · people with hypertrophic scars
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Cost‐effectiveness · people with hypertrophic scars
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Surgical site infection · skin closure in non‐obstetric surgery
Subcuticular sutures showed no clear difference in surgical site infection Incidence of wound infection compared with tissue adhesives (moderate certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Wound complications · skin closure in non‐obstetric surgery
Subcuticular sutures showed no clear difference in wound complications Incidence of wound complications compared with tissue adhesives (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Wound dehiscence · skin closure in non‐obstetric surgery
Subcuticular sutures may leads to lower wound dehiscence Incidence of wound dehiscence compared with tissue adhesives (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Cosmesis of scar · skin closure in non‐obstetric surgery
1 finding from 1 review
Patient satisfaction (within 30 days) · skin closure in non‐obstetric surgery
Subcuticular sutures showed no clear difference in patient satisfaction (within 30 days) compared with tissue adhesives (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Wound closure time (minutes) · skin closure in non‐obstetric surgery
1 finding from 1 review
Costs · skin closure in non‐obstetric surgery
1 finding from 1 review
Intervention not reported
Surgical site infection (all wound classifications) Inspection of the wound1 ( · Patients undergoing surgery
The intervention leads to higher surgical site infection (all wound classifications) Inspection of… (high certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Intervention not reported
Surgical site infection Inspection of the wound1 ( · Patients undergoing surgery
The intervention showed no clear difference in surgical site infection Inspection of the wound1 ( (moderate certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Wound dehiscence · people with surgical incisions
Octylcyanoacrylate showed no clear difference in wound dehiscence compared with butylcyanoacrylate (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review