Cochrane · systematic review · CD012124

Subcuticular sutures for skin closure in non‐obstetric surgery

Goto, S, Sakamoto, T, Ganeko, R, et al. · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · 2020 · Cochrane Library

WoundsAMSTAR 2: not assessed
SoF tableOnly the outcomes this review put in its Summary of Findings table are listed (the Cochrane Handbook caps them at about seven per comparison). Its other analyses are not shown here.
Questions
35
current version
GRADE rated
32
No studies
3
Included studies
NR
No studies 3 · 8.6%Ungraded 0 · 0%Very low 14 · 40%Low 12 · 34.3%Moderate 5 · 14.3%High 1 · 2.9%

Ungraded means an effect was reported without a GRADE rating; it is not a gap. No studies means the review found nothing to answer the question. The six categories are a display order, not a score.

Questions and results

Subcuticular sutures compared with transdermal sutures for skin closure in non‐obstetric surgery

Population: skin closure in non‐obstetric surgery
7 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Surgical site infection (SSI) Incidence of wound infection
Subcuticular sutures vs transdermal sutures
RR 1.1 [0.8, 1.52]20 studies · 3107 participantsLow
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision
Wound complications Incidence of wound complications
Subcuticular sutures vs transdermal sutures
RR 0.83 [0.4, 1.71]9 studies · 1489 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, inconsistency
Wound dehiscence Incidence of wound dehiscence
Subcuticular sutures vs transdermal sutures
RR 0.35 [0.08, 1.54]6 studies · 866 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, inconsistency
Cosmesis of scar (cosmesis)
Subcuticular sutures vs transdermal sutures
no estimate extracted5 studies · 950 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, inconsistency
Patient satisfaction (at 30 days)
Subcuticular sutures vs transdermal sutures
MD 1.6 [1.32, 1.88]1 study · 290 participantsModerate
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, inconsistency
Wound closure time (minutes)
Subcuticular sutures vs transdermal sutures
MD 5.81 [5.13, 6.49]2 studies · 585 participantsModerate
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, inconsistency
Cost
Subcuticular sutures vs transdermal sutures
no estimate extracted1 study · 100 participantsLow
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, inconsistency

Subcuticular sutures compared with skin staples for skin closure in non‐obstetric surgery

Population: skin closure in non‐obstetric surgery
7 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Surgical site infection Incidence of wound infection
Subcuticular sutures vs skin staples
RR 0.81 [0.64, 1.01]14 studies · 4163 participantsModerate
Downgraded: imprecision
Wound complications Incidence of wound complications
Subcuticular sutures vs skin staples
RR 0.79 [0.64, 0.98]9 studies · 2973 participantsModerate
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, inconsistency
Wound dehiscence Incidence of wound dehiscence
Subcuticular sutures vs skin staples
RR 0.63 [0.43, 0.94]7 studies · 1984 participantsLow
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, inconsistency
Cosmesis of scar
Subcuticular sutures vs skin staples
SMD 0.123 studies · 291 participantsLow
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, inconsistency
Patient satisfaction (at 30 days)
Subcuticular sutures vs skin staples
MD 0.2 [0.1, 0.3]1 study · 1232 participantsHigh
Wound closure time (minutes)
Subcuticular sutures vs skin staples
no estimate extracted4 studies · 1384 participantsLow
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, inconsistency
Cost
Subcuticular sutures vs skin staples
no estimate extracted4 studies · 342 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, inconsistency

Subcuticular sutures compared with tissue adhesives for skin closure in non‐obstetric surgery

Population: skin closure in non‐obstetric surgery
7 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Surgical site infection Incidence of wound infection
Subcuticular sutures vs tissue adhesives
RR 0.77 [0.41, 1.45]10 studies · 869 participantsModerate
Downgraded: imprecision
Wound complications Incidence of wound complications
Subcuticular sutures vs tissue adhesives
RR 0.62 [0.35, 1.11]11 studies · 1058 participantsLow
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, inconsistency
Wound dehiscence Incidence of wound dehiscence
Subcuticular sutures vs tissue adhesives
RR 0.23 [0.07, 0.74]11 studies · 1155 participantsLow
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, inconsistency
Cosmesis of scar
Subcuticular sutures vs tissue adhesives
no estimate extracted1 study · 99 participantsLow
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, inconsistency
Patient satisfaction (within 30 days)
Subcuticular sutures vs tissue adhesives
no estimate extracted1 study · 131 participantsLow
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, inconsistency
Wound closure time (minutes)
Subcuticular sutures vs tissue adhesives
no estimate extracted11 studies · 895 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, inconsistency
Cost
Subcuticular sutures vs tissue adhesives
no estimate extracted4 studies · 422 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, inconsistency

Subcuticular sutures compared with surgical tapes for skin closure in non‐obstetric surgery

Population: skin closure in non‐obstetric surgery
7 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Surgical site infection Incidence of wound infection
Subcuticular sutures vs surgical tapes
RR 1.31 [0.4, 4.27]6 studies · 354 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision
Wound complications Incidence of wound complications
Subcuticular sutures vs surgical tapes
RR 0.9 [0.61, 1.34]5 studies · 492 participantsLow
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, inconsistency
Wound dehiscence Incidence of wound dehiscence
Subcuticular sutures vs surgical tapes
RR 0.07 [0, 1.47]4 studies · 264 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, inconsistency
Cosmesis of scar
Subcuticular sutures vs surgical tapes
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Patient satisfaction
Subcuticular sutures vs surgical tapes
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Wound closure time (minutes)
Subcuticular sutures vs surgical tapes
no estimate extracted4 studies · 169 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, inconsistency
Cost
Subcuticular sutures vs surgical tapes
no estimate extracted3 studies · 315 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, inconsistency

Subcuticular sutures compared with surgical zippers for skin closure in non‐obstetric surgery

Population: skin closure in non‐obstetric surgery
7 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Surgical site infection Incidence of wound infection
Subcuticular sutures vs surgical zippers
RR 0.8 [0.08, 8.48]3 studies · 424 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision
Wound complications Incidence of wound complications
Subcuticular sutures vs surgical zippers
RR 0.55 [0.15, 2.04]3 studies · 424 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, inconsistency
Wound dehiscence Incidence of wound dehiscence
Subcuticular sutures vs surgical zippers
RR 0.78 [0.19, 3.16]3 studies · 424 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, inconsistency
Cosmesis of scar
Subcuticular sutures vs surgical zippers
no estimate extracted1 study · 90 participantsLow
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, inconsistency
Patient satisfaction
Subcuticular sutures vs surgical zippers
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Wound closure time (minutes)
Subcuticular sutures vs surgical zippers
no estimate extracted3 studies · 424 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, inconsistency
Cost
Subcuticular sutures vs surgical zippers
no estimate extracted1 study · 120 participantsLow
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, inconsistency