Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

Refine by population, intervention, comparison or outcome
More filters
Evidence found and GRADE certainty

128 questions · 133 findings · 20 reviews · Neonatal

No studies found 34 · 25.6%GRADE not reported 5 · 3.8%Very low 36 · 27.1%Low 36 · 27.1%Moderate 22 · 16.5%High 0 · 0%

Intervention not reported

Duration of continuous positive airway pressure therapy (hours or days) · preterm infants less than 30 weeks' gestational age requiring conventional mechanical ventilation for respiratory distress syndrome

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Salbutamol vs placebo/no treatment

Need for continuous positive airway pressure (yes/no) · patients with the management of transient tachypnea of the newborn

It is very uncertain whether salbutamol changes need for continuous positive airway pressure (yes/no) compared with placebo/no treatment (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Inhaled corticosteroids vs no treatment or placebo

Need for nasal continuous positive airway pressure · patients with the management of transient tachypnea of the newborn

It is very uncertain whether inhaled corticosteroids changes need for nasal continuous positive airway pressure compared with no treatment or placebo (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

NIPPV vs NCPAP

Respiratory failure post extubation · preterm neonates after extubation

Nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation (NIPPV) probably leads to lower respiratory failure postextubation compared with nasal continuous positive airway pressure (NCPAP) (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

NIPPV vs NCPAP

Gastrointestinal perforation · preterm neonates after extubation

Nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation (NIPPV) showed no clear difference in gastrointestinal perforation compared with nasal continuous positive airway pressure (NCPAP) (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

NIPPV vs NCPAP

Necrotising enterocolitis · preterm neonates after extubation

Nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation (NIPPV) showed no clear difference in necrotising enterocolitis compared with nasal continuous positive airway pressure (NCPAP) (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

NIPPV vs NCPAP

Chronic lung disease · preterm neonates after extubation

Nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation (NIPPV) showed no clear difference in chronic lung disease (oxygen supplementation at 36 weeks) compared with nasal continuous positive airway pressure (NCPAP) (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

NIPPV vs NCPAP

Mortality before hospital discharge · preterm neonates after extubation

Nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation (NIPPV) showed no clear difference in mortality (defined as death before discharge) compared with nasal continuous positive airway pressure (NCPAP) (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

NIPPV vs NCPAP

Need for endotracheal tube ventilation · )

Nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation (NIPPV) probably leads to lower need for endotracheal tube ventilation compared with nasal continuous positive airway pressure (NCPAP) (by population) (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

NIPPV vs NCPAP

Severe (grade 3 or greater) intraventricular hemorrhage (IVH) on cranial ultrasound ‐ not reported · )

Nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation (NIPPV) showed no clear difference in severe intraventricular hemorrhage (grade III/IV) compared with nasal continuous positive airway pressure (NCPAP) (by population) (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Intermittent phototherapy vs continuous phototherapy

Bilirubin‐induced brain dysfunction (defined as either the pathological finding of deep‐yellow staining of neurons and neuronal necrosis of the basal ganglia and brainstem nuclei or acute or chronic neurological deficit including athetoid cerebral... · neonatal jaundice
1 finding from 1 review