The review found no eligible studies for this question.
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
TLS with conventional morphological assessment of still TLS images showed no clear difference in live birth or ongoing pregnancy compared with conventional incubation and assessment (low certainty).
TLS with conventional morphological assessment of still TLS images showed no clear difference in miscarriage compared with conventional incubation and assessment (low certainty).
TLS with conventional morphological assessment of still TLS images showed no clear difference in stillbirth compared with conventional incubation and assessment (low certainty).
TLS with conventional morphological assessment of still TLS images showed no clear difference in clinical pregnancy compared with conventional incubation and assessment (low certainty).
Structured risk assessment probably leads to lower scientific behaviour: aggression – clinically important change in… compared with standard professional care (moderate certainty).
Structured risk assessment showed no clear difference in use of coercive measure: use of seclusion room (time, days) compared with standard professional care (low certainty).
Structured risk assessment showed no clear difference in use of coercive measure: use of seclusion room (participants) compared with standard professional care (low certainty).
Structured risk assessment showed no clear difference in use of coercive measure: use of seclusion room (incidents) compared with standard professional care (low certainty).
It is very uncertain whether structured risk assessment changes adverse effects (escape) compared with standard professional care (very low certainty).
It is very uncertain whether structured risk assessment changes adverse effects (fall down) compared with standard professional care (very low certainty).
It is very uncertain whether structured risk assessment changes adverse effects (choking) compared with standard professional care (very low certainty).
Biomedical risk assessment showed no clear difference in feedback on smoking exposure Smoking cessation at longest compared with standard care or minimal intervention (moderate certainty).
Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment showed no clear difference in death Median compared with usual care (moderate certainty).
Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment showed no clear difference in nursing home admission Median compared with usual care (high certainty).
Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment may leads to lower unplanned hospital admission Median compared with usual care (low certainty).
It is very uncertain whether comprehensive Geriatric Assessment changes emergency department visits Median compared with usual care (very low certainty).
It is very uncertain whether comprehensive Geriatric Assessment changes serious adverse events (falls) Median compared with usual care (very low certainty).