Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

Refine by population, intervention, comparison or outcome
More filters
Evidence found and GRADE certainty

4,345 questions · 4,525 findings · 483 reviews

No studies found 1,024 · 22.6%GRADE not reported 388 · 8.6%Very low 1,172 · 25.9%Low 1,227 · 27.1%Moderate 576 · 12.7%High 138 · 3%

Intervention not reported

Amputation at 30 days · patients seeking treatment for initial management of acute limb ischaemia

The intervention showed no clear difference in amputation at 30 days (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Intervention not reported

Death at 30 days · patients seeking treatment for initial management of acute limb ischaemia

The intervention showed no clear difference in death at 30 days (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Intervention not reported

Vessel patency at 30 days · patients seeking treatment for initial management of acute limb ischaemia

It is very uncertain whether the intervention changes vessel patency at 30 days (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Intervention not reported

Major haemorrhage at 30 days · patients seeking treatment for initial management of acute limb ischaemia

The intervention may leads to higher major haemorrhage at 30 days (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Intervention not reported

Stroke at 30 days · patients seeking treatment for initial management of acute limb ischaemia

The intervention showed no clear difference in stroke at 30 days (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Intervention not reported

Distal embolisation at 30 days · patients seeking treatment for initial management of acute limb ischaemia

It is very uncertain whether the intervention changes distal embolisation at 30 days (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Absorbable vs non‐absorbable sutures

Postoperative pain: early pain (10 days postoperatively) VAS 0 to 10 Verbal reporting scale No pain‐mild pain‐moderate pain‐severe pain (converted to numerical scale (0 to 3, 3 to 6, 6 to 10)
2 findings from 1 review

Absorbable vs non‐absorbable sutures

Wound Inflammation 6 to 12 weeks

It is very uncertain whether absorbable changes wound Inflammation 6 to 12 weeks compared with non‐absorbable sutures (very low certainty).

2 findings from 1 review

Absorbable vs non‐absorbable sutures

Postoperative scar satisfaction

It is very uncertain whether absorbable changes postoperative scar satisfaction compared with non‐absorbable sutures (very low certainty).

2 findings from 1 review

Absorbable vs non‐absorbable sutures

Adverse outcomes including wound infection, scar breakdown or return to theatre

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

2 findings from 1 review

Absorbable vs non‐absorbable sutures

DASH hand function score at 3 months Major outcome group 1 (hand function) (scores between 0 and 100, where 0 represents no impairment in hand function and 100 represents maximum impairment in hand function)

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review