Gap finder

Search review questions

Each row is one question a systematic review asked: who, what, compared with what, and which outcome, with the effect it found and how certain that is. Words match anywhere in the field.

Limit to evidence status or GRADE (optional)

1,000 questions in 69 reviews · Urology

current versions
No studies 196 · 19.6%Ungraded 33 · 3.3%Very low 198 · 19.8%Low 354 · 35.4%Moderate 206 · 20.6%High 13 · 1.3%

Ungraded means an effect was reported without a GRADE rating; it is not a gap. No studies means the review found nothing to answer the question. The six categories are a display order, not a score.

QuestionEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Desmopressin plus alpha‐blocker vs alpha‐blocker plus anticholinergic
Time to first void ‐ not reported
Desmopressin for treating nocturia in men (2017) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Desmopressin plus alpha‐blocker vs alpha‐blocker plus anticholinergic
Minor adverse events
Desmopressin for treating nocturia in men (2017) · Cochrane
RR 0.22 [0.05, 0.98]1 study · 427 participantsLow
Desmopressin plus alpha‐blocker vs alpha‐blocker plus anticholinergic
Treatment withdrawal due to adverse event
Desmopressin for treating nocturia in men (2017) · Cochrane
RR 0.22 [0.05, 0.98]1 study · 427 participantsLow
Desmopressin vs placebo
Time to first void
Desmopressin for treating nocturia in men (2017) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1 study · 383 participantsLow
Desmopressin vs placebo
Minor adverse event
Desmopressin for treating nocturia in men (2017) · Cochrane
RR 0.87 [0.67, 1.13]3 studies · 594 participantsLow
Desmopressin vs placebo
Treatment withdrawal due to adverse event
Desmopressin for treating nocturia in men (2017) · Cochrane
RR 1.1 [0.56, 2.15]4 studies · 614 participantsLow
Desmopressin vs placebo
Number of nocturnal voids
Desmopressin for treating nocturia in men (2017) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1 study · 115 participantsLow
Desmopressin vs placebo
Quality of life ‐ not reported
Desmopressin for treating nocturia in men (2017) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Alvimopan vs placebo
Time‐to‐tolerance of a solid diet and documented bowel movements
Alvimopan for recovery of bowel function after radical cystectomy (2017) · Cochrane
HR 1.77 [1.41, 2.23]1 study · 277 participantsModerate
Alvimopan vs placebo
Time‐to‐hospital discharge
Alvimopan for recovery of bowel function after radical cystectomy (2017) · Cochrane
HR 1.67 [1.38, 2.01]1 study · 277 participantsModerate
Alvimopan vs placebo
Major adverse events
Alvimopan for recovery of bowel function after radical cystectomy (2017) · Cochrane
RR 0.28 [0.18, 0.44]1 study · 277 participantsModerate
Alvimopan vs placebo
Readmission
Alvimopan for recovery of bowel function after radical cystectomy (2017) · Cochrane
RR 0.89 [0.59, 1.33]1 study · 277 participantsModerate
Alvimopan vs placebo
Any cardiovascular event
Alvimopan for recovery of bowel function after radical cystectomy (2017) · Cochrane
RR 0.54 [0.27, 1.05]1 study · 277 participantsModerate
Intravesically administered BCG combined with IFN‐α vs intravesically administered BCG alone
Recurrence · patients with non‐muscle invasive bladder cancer
Intravesical Bacillus Calmette‐Guérin with interferon‐alpha versus intravesical Bacillus Calmette‐Guérin for… (2017) · Cochrane
RR 0.76 [0.44, 1.32]4 studies · 925 participantsVery low
Intravesically administered BCG alternating with IFN‐α vs intravesically administered BCG alone
Disease‐specific quality of life ‐ not measured · patients with non‐muscle invasive bladder cancer
Intravesical Bacillus Calmette‐Guérin with interferon‐alpha versus intravesical Bacillus Calmette‐Guérin for… (2017) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Intravesically administered BCG combined with IFN‐α vs intravesically administered BCG alone
Progression · patients with non‐muscle invasive bladder cancer
Intravesical Bacillus Calmette‐Guérin with interferon‐alpha versus intravesical Bacillus Calmette‐Guérin for… (2017) · Cochrane
RR 0.26 [0.04, 1.87]2 studies · 219 participantsLow
Intravesically administered BCG combined with IFN‐α vs intravesically administered BCG alone
Discontinuation of therapy due to adverse events ‐ not measured · patients with non‐muscle invasive bladder cancer
Intravesical Bacillus Calmette‐Guérin with interferon‐alpha versus intravesical Bacillus Calmette‐Guérin for… (2017) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Intravesically administered BCG combined with IFN‐α vs intravesically administered BCG alone
Disease‐specific mortality · patients with non‐muscle invasive bladder cancer
Intravesical Bacillus Calmette‐Guérin with interferon‐alpha versus intravesical Bacillus Calmette‐Guérin for… (2017) · Cochrane
RR 0.38 [0.05, 3.05]1 study · 99 participantsVery low
Intravesically administered BCG combined with IFN‐α vs intravesically administered BCG alone
Disease‐specific quality of life ‐ not measured · patients with non‐muscle invasive bladder cancer
Intravesical Bacillus Calmette‐Guérin with interferon‐alpha versus intravesical Bacillus Calmette‐Guérin for… (2017) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Intravesically administered BCG alternating with IFN‐α vs intravesically administered BCG alone
Time‐to‐recurrence · patients with non‐muscle invasive bladder cancer
Intravesical Bacillus Calmette‐Guérin with interferon‐alpha versus intravesical Bacillus Calmette‐Guérin for… (2017) · Cochrane
HR 2.86 [1.98, 4.13]1 study · 205 participantsLow
Intravesically administered BCG alternating with IFN‐α vs intravesically administered BCG alone
Time‐to‐progression · patients with non‐muscle invasive bladder cancer
Intravesical Bacillus Calmette‐Guérin with interferon‐alpha versus intravesical Bacillus Calmette‐Guérin for… (2017) · Cochrane
HR 2.39 [0.92, 6.21]1 study · 205 participantsLow
Intravesically administered BCG alternating with IFN‐α vs intravesically administered BCG alone
Discontinuation of therapy due to adverse events · patients with non‐muscle invasive bladder cancer
Intravesical Bacillus Calmette‐Guérin with interferon‐alpha versus intravesical Bacillus Calmette‐Guérin for… (2017) · Cochrane
RR 2.97 [0.31, 28.09]1 study · 205 participantsLow
Intravesically administered BCG alternating with IFN‐α vs intravesically administered BCG alone
Disease‐specific mortality · patients with non‐muscle invasive bladder cancer
Intravesical Bacillus Calmette‐Guérin with interferon‐alpha versus intravesical Bacillus Calmette‐Guérin for… (2017) · Cochrane
HR 2.74 [0.73, 10.28]1 study · 205 participantsLow
Silodosin vs placebo
Urologic symptom scores
Silodosin for the treatment of lower urinary tract symptoms in men with benign prostatic hyperplasia (2017) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted3 studies · 1743 participantsLow
Silodosin vs tamsulosin
Sexual adverse events
Silodosin for the treatment of lower urinary tract symptoms in men with benign prostatic hyperplasia (2017) · Cochrane
RR 6.05 [3.55, 10.31]10 studies · 1849 participantsModerate
Silodosin vs naftopidil
Urologic symptom scores
Silodosin for the treatment of lower urinary tract symptoms in men with benign prostatic hyperplasia (2017) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted5 studies · 652 participantsLow
Silodosin vs naftopidil
QoL
Silodosin for the treatment of lower urinary tract symptoms in men with benign prostatic hyperplasia (2017) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted5 studies · 652 participantsLow
Silodosin vs naftopidil
Treatment withdrawal due to any reason
Silodosin for the treatment of lower urinary tract symptoms in men with benign prostatic hyperplasia (2017) · Cochrane
RR 1.25 [0.81, 1.93]4 studies · 659 participantsLow
Silodosin vs naftopidil
Cardiovascular adverse events
Silodosin for the treatment of lower urinary tract symptoms in men with benign prostatic hyperplasia (2017) · Cochrane
RR 1.02 [0.41, 2.56]5 studies · 808 participantsLow
Silodosin vs naftopidil
Sexual adverse events
Silodosin for the treatment of lower urinary tract symptoms in men with benign prostatic hyperplasia (2017) · Cochrane
RR 5.93 [2.16, 16.29]4 studies · 405 participantsModerate
Silodosin vs alfuzosin
Urologic symptom scores
Silodosin for the treatment of lower urinary tract symptoms in men with benign prostatic hyperplasia (2017) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1 study · 60 participantsLow
Silodosin vs alfuzosin
QoL
Silodosin for the treatment of lower urinary tract symptoms in men with benign prostatic hyperplasia (2017) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1 study · 60 participantsModerate
Silodosin vs alfuzosin
Treatment withdrawal due to any reason
Silodosin for the treatment of lower urinary tract symptoms in men with benign prostatic hyperplasia (2017) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1 study · 60 participantsLow
Silodosin vs alfuzosin
Cardiovascular adverse events
Silodosin for the treatment of lower urinary tract symptoms in men with benign prostatic hyperplasia (2017) · Cochrane
RR 0.67 [0.36, 1.24]1 study · 60 participantsLow
Silodosin vs placebo
QoL
Silodosin for the treatment of lower urinary tract symptoms in men with benign prostatic hyperplasia (2017) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted2 studies · 820 participantsModerate
Silodosin vs alfuzosin
Sexual adverse events
Silodosin for the treatment of lower urinary tract symptoms in men with benign prostatic hyperplasia (2017) · Cochrane
RR 37.21 [5.32, 260.07]1 study · 95 participantsModerate
Silodosin vs placebo
Treatment withdrawal due to any reason
Silodosin for the treatment of lower urinary tract symptoms in men with benign prostatic hyperplasia (2017) · Cochrane
RR 1.08 [0.7, 1.66]3 studies · 1703 participantsLow
Silodosin vs placebo
Cardiovascular adverse events
Silodosin for the treatment of lower urinary tract symptoms in men with benign prostatic hyperplasia (2017) · Cochrane
RR 1.28 [0.67, 2.45]4 studies · 1967 participantsVery low
Silodosin vs placebo
Sexual adverse events
Silodosin for the treatment of lower urinary tract symptoms in men with benign prostatic hyperplasia (2017) · Cochrane
RR 26.07 [12.36, 54.97]4 studies · 1967 participantsModerate
Silodosin vs tamsulosin
Urologic symptom scores
Silodosin for the treatment of lower urinary tract symptoms in men with benign prostatic hyperplasia (2017) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted10 studies · 1708 participantsLow
Silodosin vs tamsulosin
QoL
Silodosin for the treatment of lower urinary tract symptoms in men with benign prostatic hyperplasia (2017) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted10 studies · 1707 participantsLow
Silodosin vs tamsulosin
Treatment withdrawal due to any reason
Silodosin for the treatment of lower urinary tract symptoms in men with benign prostatic hyperplasia (2017) · Cochrane
RR 1.02 [0.62, 1.69]10 studies · 1573 participantsVery low
Silodosin vs tamsulosin
Cardiovascular adverse events
Silodosin for the treatment of lower urinary tract symptoms in men with benign prostatic hyperplasia (2017) · Cochrane
RR 0.77 [0.53, 1.12]11 studies · 1955 participantsLow
Surgical vs non‐surgical management
Split renal function (SRF; · newborns and infants < 2 years of age with unilateral ureteric‐pelvic junction obstruction
Surgery versus non‐surgical management for unilateral ureteric‐pelvic junction obstruction in newborns and… (2016) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1 study · 17 participantsVery low
Surgical vs non‐surgical management
Drainage pattern ( · newborns and infants < 2 years of age with unilateral ureteric‐pelvic junction obstruction
Surgery versus non‐surgical management for unilateral ureteric‐pelvic junction obstruction in newborns and… (2016) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted2 studies · 57 participantsVery low
Surgical vs non‐surgical management
Upper urinary tract dilatation ( · newborns and infants < 2 years of age with unilateral ureteric‐pelvic junction obstruction
Surgery versus non‐surgical management for unilateral ureteric‐pelvic junction obstruction in newborns and… (2016) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1 study · 15 participantsVery low
Surgical vs non‐surgical management
UPJO‐associated clinical symptoms · newborns and infants < 2 years of age with unilateral ureteric‐pelvic junction obstruction
Surgery versus non‐surgical management for unilateral ureteric‐pelvic junction obstruction in newborns and… (2016) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRVery low
Non‐steroidal antiandrogen monotherapy vs LHRH agonists or surgical castration monotherapy
Overall survival · men with advanced prostate cancer
Non‐steroidal antiandrogen monotherapy compared with luteinising hormone–releasing hormone agonists or… (2014) · Cochrane
HR 1.24 [1.05, 1.48]6 studies · 2712 participantsModerate
Non‐steroidal antiandrogen monotherapy vs LHRH agonists or surgical castration monotherapy
Clinical progression · men with advanced prostate cancer
Non‐steroidal antiandrogen monotherapy compared with luteinising hormone–releasing hormone agonists or… (2014) · Cochrane
RR 1.26 [1.08, 1.45]6 studies · 2373 participantsModerate
Non‐steroidal antiandrogen monotherapy vs LHRH agonists or surgical castration monotherapy
Treatment failure · men with advanced prostate cancer
Non‐steroidal antiandrogen monotherapy compared with luteinising hormone–releasing hormone agonists or… (2014) · Cochrane
RR 1.27 [1.05, 1.52]5 studies · 1845 participantsModerate