Gap finder
Search review questions
Each row is one question a systematic review asked: who, what, compared with what, and which outcome, with the effect it found and how certain that is. Words match anywhere in the field.
1,173 questions in 89 reviews · Neuromuscular
current versionsNo studies 302 · 25.7%Ungraded 119 · 10.1%Very low 267 · 22.8%Low 239 · 20.4%Moderate 177 · 15.1%High 69 · 5.9%
Ungraded means an effect was reported without a GRADE rating; it is not a gap. No studies means the review found nothing to answer the question. The six categories are a display order, not a score.
| Question | Effect | Evidence | Status / GRADE |
|---|---|---|---|
Intensive insulin therapy vs conventional insulin therapy Duration of ICU stay ‐ in total population randomised (in days) · critically ill patients Interventions for preventing critical illness polyneuropathy and critical illness myopathy (2014) · Cochrane | no estimate extracted | 2 studies · 2748 participants | High |
Intensive insulin therapy vs conventional insulin therapy Death ‐ at 30 days after ICU admission, in total population randomised · critically ill patients Interventions for preventing critical illness polyneuropathy and critical illness myopathy (2014) · Cochrane | RR 0.94 [0.8, 1.1] | 2 studies · 2748 participants | High |
Intensive insulin therapy vs conventional insulin therapy Death ‐ at 180 days after ICU admission, in total population randomised · critically ill patients Interventions for preventing critical illness polyneuropathy and critical illness myopathy (2014) · Cochrane | RR 0.87 [0.76, 1] | 2 studies · 2748 participants | Moderate |
Intensive insulin therapy vs conventional insulin therapy Serious adverse events, ‐ in total population randomised ‐ hypoglycaemia · critically ill patients Interventions for preventing critical illness polyneuropathy and critical illness myopathy (2014) · Cochrane | RR 6.27 [4.15, 9.49] | 2 studies · 2748 participants | High |
Corticosteroids vs placebo compared Occurrence of CIP/CIM ‐ in total population randomised · critically ill patients Interventions for preventing critical illness polyneuropathy and critical illness myopathy (2014) · Cochrane | RR 1.27 [0.77, 2.08] | 1 study · 180 participants | Low |
Corticosteroids vs placebo compared Occurrence of CIP/CIM ‐ in screened population · critically ill patients Interventions for preventing critical illness polyneuropathy and critical illness myopathy (2014) · Cochrane | RR 1.09 [0.53, 2.26] | 1 study · 92 participants | Moderate |
Intervention NR Presence of PHN 6 months after the onset of the acute herpetic rash2 Clinical diagnostic criteria for PHN in any intensity · people with acute herpes zoster1 Antiviral treatment for preventing postherpetic neuralgia (2014) · Cochrane | no estimate extracted | 2 studies · 476 participants | High |
Intervention NR Presence of PHN 4 months after the onset of the acute herpetic rash Clinical diagnostic criteria for PHN in any intensity · people with acute herpes zoster1 Antiviral treatment for preventing postherpetic neuralgia (2014) · Cochrane | RR 0.75 [0.51, 1.11] | 3 studies · 609 participants | High |
Intervention NR Adverse events Clinical manifestations · people with acute herpes zoster1 Antiviral treatment for preventing postherpetic neuralgia (2014) · Cochrane | RR 1.01 [0.88, 1.15] | 4 studies · 709 participants | High |
Intranasal neostigmine vs placebo Improved muscle function various methods1 · people with myasthenia gravis Acetylcholinesterase inhibitor treatment for myasthenia gravis (2014) · Cochrane | no estimate extracted | 10 participants | Very low |
Intranasal neostigmine vs placebo Adverse events · people with myasthenia gravis Acetylcholinesterase inhibitor treatment for myasthenia gravis (2014) · Cochrane | no estimate extracted | 1 study · 20 participants | Very low |
Intranasal neostigmine vs placebo Change in impairment 1 to 14 days after the start of treatment ‐ not reported · people with myasthenia gravis Acetylcholinesterase inhibitor treatment for myasthenia gravis (2014) · Cochrane | no estimate extracted | NR | No studies |
Intervention NR Number of patients with ≥ 50% improvement of pain at 12 weeks or less Duloxetine 60 mg daily 11‐point Likert score · patients with painful neuropathy or chronic pain from diabetic peripheral neuropathy Duloxetine for treating painful neuropathy, chronic pain or fibromyalgia (2014) · Cochrane | RR 1.73 [1.44, 2.08] | 4 studies · 908 participants | Moderate |
Intervention NR Adverse events · patients with the chronic pain of fibromyalgia Duloxetine for treating painful neuropathy, chronic pain or fibromyalgia (2014) · Cochrane | no estimate extracted | NR | No studies |
Intervention NR Number with ≥ 50% pain relief at 12 weeks or less · patients with pain in major depressive disorder Duloxetine for treating painful neuropathy, chronic pain or fibromyalgia (2014) · Cochrane | RR 1.37 [1.19, 1.59] | 2 studies · 1023 participants | Moderate |
Intervention NR Number with ≥ 30% pain relief at 12 weeks or less · patients with pain in major depressive disorder Duloxetine for treating painful neuropathy, chronic pain or fibromyalgia (2014) · Cochrane | RR 1.27 [1.15, 1.4] | 3 studies · 1359 participants | Low |
Intervention NR Mean improvement in pain at 12 weeks or less Visual analogue scale. Scale from: 0 to 10. · patients with pain in major depressive disorder Duloxetine for treating painful neuropathy, chronic pain or fibromyalgia (2014) · Cochrane | no estimate extracted | 3 studies · 1359 participants | Low |
Intervention NR Mean improvement in Patient Reported Global Impression of Change at 12 weeks or less · patients with pain in major depressive disorder Duloxetine for treating painful neuropathy, chronic pain or fibromyalgia (2014) · Cochrane | no estimate extracted | NR | No studies |
Intervention NR Adverse events · patients with pain in major depressive disorder Duloxetine for treating painful neuropathy, chronic pain or fibromyalgia (2014) · Cochrane | no estimate extracted | NR | No studies |
Intervention NR Mean improvement in pain at 12 weeks or less Duloxetine 60 mg daily 11‐point Likert score Scale from: 0 to 10 · patients with painful neuropathy or chronic pain from diabetic peripheral neuropathy Duloxetine for treating painful neuropathy, chronic pain or fibromyalgia (2014) · Cochrane | no estimate extracted | 4 studies · 722 participants | Moderate |
Intervention NR Number of patients with ≥ 30% improvement in pain at 12 weeks or less Duloxetine 60 mg daily 11‐point Likert scale · patients with painful neuropathy or chronic pain from diabetic peripheral neuropathy Duloxetine for treating painful neuropathy, chronic pain or fibromyalgia (2014) · Cochrane | RR 1.53 [1.33, 1.75] | 4 studies · 799 participants | Moderate |
Intervention NR Mean improvement in Patient Reported Global Impression of Change at 12 weeks or less Duloxetine 60 mg daily VAS Scale from: 0 to 10 · patients with painful neuropathy or chronic pain from diabetic peripheral neuropathy Duloxetine for treating painful neuropathy, chronic pain or fibromyalgia (2014) · Cochrane | no estimate extracted | 5 studies · 1018 participants | Moderate |
Intervention NR Adverse event leading to cessation All neuropathic pain indications Duloxetine 60 mg daily · patients with painful neuropathy or chronic pain from diabetic peripheral neuropathy Duloxetine for treating painful neuropathy, chronic pain or fibromyalgia (2014) · Cochrane | RR 1.95 [1.6, 2.37] | 14 studies · 4837 participants | Low |
Intervention NR Number with ≥ 50% improvement of pain at 12 weeks or less Duloxetine 60 mg daily 11‐point Likert scale · patients with the chronic pain of fibromyalgia Duloxetine for treating painful neuropathy, chronic pain or fibromyalgia (2014) · Cochrane | RR 1.57 [1.2, 2.06] | 2 studies · 528 participants | Low |
Intervention NR Number with ≥ 30% improvement of pain at 12 weeks or less Duloxetine 60 mg daily · patients with the chronic pain of fibromyalgia Duloxetine for treating painful neuropathy, chronic pain or fibromyalgia (2014) · Cochrane | RR 1.52 [1.24, 1.85] | 2 studies · 528 participants | Low |
Intervention NR Mean improvement in the Patient Reported Global Impression of Change at completion of trial Duloxetine 60 mg daily VAS Scale from: 0 to 10 · patients with the chronic pain of fibromyalgia Duloxetine for treating painful neuropathy, chronic pain or fibromyalgia (2014) · Cochrane | no estimate extracted | 2 studies · 519 participants | Low |
Intervention NR Mean improvement in pain at 12 weeks or less Duloxetine 120 mg daily LikertScale from: 0 to 10 · patients with the chronic pain of fibromyalgia Duloxetine for treating painful neuropathy, chronic pain or fibromyalgia (2014) · Cochrane | no estimate extracted | 1 study · 507 participants | Moderate |
Amantadine vs placebo Reduction in fatigue of at least 1‐point on the Fatigue Severity Scale between 4 to 12 weeks after commencement of intervention Fatigue Severity Scale (FSS) from 1 to 7 (higher score is worse) · people with fatigue in Guillain‐Barré syndrome Interventions for fatigue in peripheral neuropathy (2014) · Cochrane | OR 0.56 [0.22, 1.35] | 74 participants | Low |
Ascorbic acid vs placebo Change in 10 metre timed walk 12 or more weeks after commencement of intervention Time taken to walk 10 metres in seconds · people with fatigue in peripheral neuropathy Interventions for fatigue in peripheral neuropathy (2014) · Cochrane | no estimate extracted | 2 studies · 406 participants | Moderate |
Ascorbic acid vs placebo Change in speed of completion of 9‐hole peg test (in seconds) · people with fatigue in peripheral neuropathy Interventions for fatigue in peripheral neuropathy (2014) · Cochrane | no estimate extracted | 1 study · 224 participants | Moderate |
Ascorbic acid vs placebo Health‐related quality of life 12 or more weeks after commencement of the intervention Change in SF‐36 physical function score SF‐36 Physical Functioning Scale and Physical Component Score · people with fatigue in peripheral neuropathy Interventions for fatigue in peripheral neuropathy (2014) · Cochrane | no estimate extracted | 2 studies · 400 participants | Moderate |
Ascorbic acid vs placebo Change in participation 12 or more weeks after commencement of intervention (not measured) · people with fatigue in peripheral neuropathy Interventions for fatigue in peripheral neuropathy (2014) · Cochrane | no estimate extracted | NR | No studies |
Ascorbic acid vs placebo Health‐related quality of life 12 or more weeks after commencement of the intervention Change in mental function score of SF‐36 SF‐36 Mental Component Score · people with fatigue in peripheral neuropathy Interventions for fatigue in peripheral neuropathy (2014) · Cochrane | no estimate extracted | 1 study · 123 participants | Moderate |
Ascorbic acid vs placebo Serious adverse events · people with fatigue in peripheral neuropathy Interventions for fatigue in peripheral neuropathy (2014) · Cochrane | RR 0.7 [0.39, 1.27] | 2 studies · 450 participants | Moderate |
Amantadine vs placebo Change in fatigue 12 or more weeks after commencement of intervention (not measured) · people with fatigue in Guillain‐Barré syndrome Interventions for fatigue in peripheral neuropathy (2014) · Cochrane | no estimate extracted | NR | No studies |
Amantadine vs placebo Change in activity limitation 12 or more weeks after commencement of intervention (not measured) · people with fatigue in Guillain‐Barré syndrome Interventions for fatigue in peripheral neuropathy (2014) · Cochrane | no estimate extracted | NR | No studies |
Amantadine vs placebo Change in participation 12 or more weeks after commencement of intervention using the Rotterdam Handicap Scale. Scale from: 0 to 36. · people with fatigue in Guillain‐Barré syndrome Interventions for fatigue in peripheral neuropathy (2014) · Cochrane | no estimate extracted | 74 participants | Low |
Amantadine vs placebo Health related quality of life after 12 or more weeks or more after commencement of intervention (not reported) · people with fatigue in Guillain‐Barré syndrome Interventions for fatigue in peripheral neuropathy (2014) · Cochrane | no estimate extracted | NR | No studies |
Amantadine vs placebo Serious adverse events · people with fatigue in Guillain‐Barré syndrome Interventions for fatigue in peripheral neuropathy (2014) · Cochrane | no estimate extracted | 80 participants | Ungraded |
Ascorbic acid vs placebo Reduction in fatigue of at least 1 point on the Fatigue Severity Scale (FSS) between 4 to 12 weeks after commencement of intervention (not measured) · people with fatigue in peripheral neuropathy Interventions for fatigue in peripheral neuropathy (2014) · Cochrane | no estimate extracted | NR | No studies |
Ascorbic acid vs placebo Change in fatigue 12 or more weeks after commencement of intervention Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) of fatigue · people with fatigue in peripheral neuropathy Interventions for fatigue in peripheral neuropathy (2014) · Cochrane | no estimate extracted | 2 studies · 404 participants | Moderate |
Ascorbic acid vs placebo Change in activity limitation (ODSS/ONLS) · people with fatigue in peripheral neuropathy Interventions for fatigue in peripheral neuropathy (2014) · Cochrane | no estimate extracted | 2 studies · 406 participants | Ungraded |
Endoscopic vs open or mini‐open carpal tunnel release Symptom Severity Scale (Levine) at 3 months or less Participants' self assessment questionnaire. Scale from: 1 to 5. · participants with carpal tunnel syndrome Endoscopic release for carpal tunnel syndrome (2014) · Cochrane | no estimate extracted | 5 studies · 551 participants | Low |
Endoscopic vs open or mini‐open carpal tunnel release Minor complications events with minor complications · participants with carpal tunnel syndrome Endoscopic release for carpal tunnel syndrome (2014) · Cochrane | RR 0.55 [0.38, 0.81] | 18 studies · 1786 participants | Low |
Endoscopic vs open or mini‐open carpal tunnel release Functional Status Scale (Levine) at 3 months or less Participants' self assessment questionnaire. Scale from: 1 to 5. · participants with carpal tunnel syndrome Endoscopic release for carpal tunnel syndrome (2014) · Cochrane | no estimate extracted | 5 studies · 551 participants | Low |
Endoscopic vs open or mini‐open carpal tunnel release Grip strength at 3 months or less Dynamometer · participants with carpal tunnel syndrome Endoscopic release for carpal tunnel syndrome (2014) · Cochrane | no estimate extracted | 6 studies · 560 participants | Moderate |
Endoscopic vs open or mini‐open carpal tunnel release Overall improvement at more than 3 months Participants' subjective evaluation · participants with carpal tunnel syndrome Endoscopic release for carpal tunnel syndrome (2014) · Cochrane | RR 1.04 [0.95, 1.14] | 4 studies · 317 participants | Low |
Endoscopic vs open or mini‐open carpal tunnel release Symptom Severity Scale (Levine) at more than 3 months Participants' self assessment questionnaire. Scale from: 1 to 5. · participants with carpal tunnel syndrome Endoscopic release for carpal tunnel syndrome (2014) · Cochrane | no estimate extracted | 2 studies · 273 participants | Low |
Endoscopic vs open or mini‐open carpal tunnel release Function Status Scale (Levine) at more than 3 months Participants' self assessment questionnaire. Scale from: 1 to 5. · participants with carpal tunnel syndrome Endoscopic release for carpal tunnel syndrome (2014) · Cochrane | no estimate extracted | 2 studies · 273 participants | Low |
Endoscopic vs open or mini‐open carpal tunnel release Grip strength at more than 3 months Dynamometer. Scale from: 0 to 50. · participants with carpal tunnel syndrome Endoscopic release for carpal tunnel syndrome (2014) · Cochrane | no estimate extracted | 2 studies · 56 participants | Low |