Gap finder

Search review questions

Each row is one question a systematic review asked: who, what, compared with what, and which outcome, with the effect it found and how certain that is. Words match anywhere in the field.

Limit to evidence status or GRADE (optional)

1,173 questions in 89 reviews · Neuromuscular

current versions
No studies 302 · 25.7%Ungraded 119 · 10.1%Very low 267 · 22.8%Low 239 · 20.4%Moderate 177 · 15.1%High 69 · 5.9%

Ungraded means an effect was reported without a GRADE rating; it is not a gap. No studies means the review found nothing to answer the question. The six categories are a display order, not a score.

QuestionEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Intensive insulin therapy vs conventional insulin therapy
Duration of ICU stay ‐ in total population randomised (in days) · critically ill patients
Interventions for preventing critical illness polyneuropathy and critical illness myopathy (2014) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted2 studies · 2748 participantsHigh
Intensive insulin therapy vs conventional insulin therapy
Death ‐ at 30 days after ICU admission, in total population randomised · critically ill patients
Interventions for preventing critical illness polyneuropathy and critical illness myopathy (2014) · Cochrane
RR 0.94 [0.8, 1.1]2 studies · 2748 participantsHigh
Intensive insulin therapy vs conventional insulin therapy
Death ‐ at 180 days after ICU admission, in total population randomised · critically ill patients
Interventions for preventing critical illness polyneuropathy and critical illness myopathy (2014) · Cochrane
RR 0.87 [0.76, 1]2 studies · 2748 participantsModerate
Intensive insulin therapy vs conventional insulin therapy
Serious adverse events, ‐ in total population randomised ‐ hypoglycaemia · critically ill patients
Interventions for preventing critical illness polyneuropathy and critical illness myopathy (2014) · Cochrane
RR 6.27 [4.15, 9.49]2 studies · 2748 participantsHigh
Corticosteroids vs placebo compared
Occurrence of CIP/CIM ‐ in total population randomised · critically ill patients
Interventions for preventing critical illness polyneuropathy and critical illness myopathy (2014) · Cochrane
RR 1.27 [0.77, 2.08]1 study · 180 participantsLow
Corticosteroids vs placebo compared
Occurrence of CIP/CIM ‐ in screened population · critically ill patients
Interventions for preventing critical illness polyneuropathy and critical illness myopathy (2014) · Cochrane
RR 1.09 [0.53, 2.26]1 study · 92 participantsModerate
Intervention NR
Presence of PHN 6 months after the onset of the acute herpetic rash2 Clinical diagnostic criteria for PHN in any intensity · people with acute herpes zoster1
Antiviral treatment for preventing postherpetic neuralgia (2014) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted2 studies · 476 participantsHigh
Intervention NR
Presence of PHN 4 months after the onset of the acute herpetic rash Clinical diagnostic criteria for PHN in any intensity · people with acute herpes zoster1
Antiviral treatment for preventing postherpetic neuralgia (2014) · Cochrane
RR 0.75 [0.51, 1.11]3 studies · 609 participantsHigh
Intervention NR
Adverse events Clinical manifestations · people with acute herpes zoster1
Antiviral treatment for preventing postherpetic neuralgia (2014) · Cochrane
RR 1.01 [0.88, 1.15]4 studies · 709 participantsHigh
Intranasal neostigmine vs placebo
Improved muscle function various methods1 · people with myasthenia gravis
Acetylcholinesterase inhibitor treatment for myasthenia gravis (2014) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted10 participantsVery low
Intranasal neostigmine vs placebo
Adverse events · people with myasthenia gravis
Acetylcholinesterase inhibitor treatment for myasthenia gravis (2014) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1 study · 20 participantsVery low
Intranasal neostigmine vs placebo
Change in impairment 1 to 14 days after the start of treatment ‐ not reported · people with myasthenia gravis
Acetylcholinesterase inhibitor treatment for myasthenia gravis (2014) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Intervention NR
Number of patients with ≥ 50% improvement of pain at 12 weeks or less Duloxetine 60 mg daily 11‐point Likert score · patients with painful neuropathy or chronic pain from diabetic peripheral neuropathy
Duloxetine for treating painful neuropathy, chronic pain or fibromyalgia (2014) · Cochrane
RR 1.73 [1.44, 2.08]4 studies · 908 participantsModerate
Intervention NR
Adverse events · patients with the chronic pain of fibromyalgia
Duloxetine for treating painful neuropathy, chronic pain or fibromyalgia (2014) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Intervention NR
Number with ≥ 50% pain relief at 12 weeks or less · patients with pain in major depressive disorder
Duloxetine for treating painful neuropathy, chronic pain or fibromyalgia (2014) · Cochrane
RR 1.37 [1.19, 1.59]2 studies · 1023 participantsModerate
Intervention NR
Number with ≥ 30% pain relief at 12 weeks or less · patients with pain in major depressive disorder
Duloxetine for treating painful neuropathy, chronic pain or fibromyalgia (2014) · Cochrane
RR 1.27 [1.15, 1.4]3 studies · 1359 participantsLow
Intervention NR
Mean improvement in pain at 12 weeks or less Visual analogue scale. Scale from: 0 to 10. · patients with pain in major depressive disorder
Duloxetine for treating painful neuropathy, chronic pain or fibromyalgia (2014) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted3 studies · 1359 participantsLow
Intervention NR
Mean improvement in Patient Reported Global Impression of Change at 12 weeks or less · patients with pain in major depressive disorder
Duloxetine for treating painful neuropathy, chronic pain or fibromyalgia (2014) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Intervention NR
Adverse events · patients with pain in major depressive disorder
Duloxetine for treating painful neuropathy, chronic pain or fibromyalgia (2014) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Intervention NR
Mean improvement in pain at 12 weeks or less Duloxetine 60 mg daily 11‐point Likert score Scale from: 0 to 10 · patients with painful neuropathy or chronic pain from diabetic peripheral neuropathy
Duloxetine for treating painful neuropathy, chronic pain or fibromyalgia (2014) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted4 studies · 722 participantsModerate
Intervention NR
Number of patients with ≥ 30% improvement in pain at 12 weeks or less Duloxetine 60 mg daily 11‐point Likert scale · patients with painful neuropathy or chronic pain from diabetic peripheral neuropathy
Duloxetine for treating painful neuropathy, chronic pain or fibromyalgia (2014) · Cochrane
RR 1.53 [1.33, 1.75]4 studies · 799 participantsModerate
Intervention NR
Mean improvement in Patient Reported Global Impression of Change at 12 weeks or less Duloxetine 60 mg daily VAS Scale from: 0 to 10 · patients with painful neuropathy or chronic pain from diabetic peripheral neuropathy
Duloxetine for treating painful neuropathy, chronic pain or fibromyalgia (2014) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted5 studies · 1018 participantsModerate
Intervention NR
Adverse event leading to cessation All neuropathic pain indications Duloxetine 60 mg daily · patients with painful neuropathy or chronic pain from diabetic peripheral neuropathy
Duloxetine for treating painful neuropathy, chronic pain or fibromyalgia (2014) · Cochrane
RR 1.95 [1.6, 2.37]14 studies · 4837 participantsLow
Intervention NR
Number with ≥ 50% improvement of pain at 12 weeks or less Duloxetine 60 mg daily 11‐point Likert scale · patients with the chronic pain of fibromyalgia
Duloxetine for treating painful neuropathy, chronic pain or fibromyalgia (2014) · Cochrane
RR 1.57 [1.2, 2.06]2 studies · 528 participantsLow
Intervention NR
Number with ≥ 30% improvement of pain at 12 weeks or less Duloxetine 60 mg daily · patients with the chronic pain of fibromyalgia
Duloxetine for treating painful neuropathy, chronic pain or fibromyalgia (2014) · Cochrane
RR 1.52 [1.24, 1.85]2 studies · 528 participantsLow
Intervention NR
Mean improvement in the Patient Reported Global Impression of Change at completion of trial Duloxetine 60 mg daily VAS Scale from: 0 to 10 · patients with the chronic pain of fibromyalgia
Duloxetine for treating painful neuropathy, chronic pain or fibromyalgia (2014) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted2 studies · 519 participantsLow
Intervention NR
Mean improvement in pain at 12 weeks or less Duloxetine 120 mg daily LikertScale from: 0 to 10 · patients with the chronic pain of fibromyalgia
Duloxetine for treating painful neuropathy, chronic pain or fibromyalgia (2014) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1 study · 507 participantsModerate
Amantadine vs placebo
Reduction in fatigue of at least 1‐point on the Fatigue Severity Scale between 4 to 12 weeks after commencement of intervention Fatigue Severity Scale (FSS) from 1 to 7 (higher score is worse) · people with fatigue in Guillain‐Barré syndrome
Interventions for fatigue in peripheral neuropathy (2014) · Cochrane
OR 0.56 [0.22, 1.35]74 participantsLow
Ascorbic acid vs placebo
Change in 10 metre timed walk 12 or more weeks after commencement of intervention Time taken to walk 10 metres in seconds · people with fatigue in peripheral neuropathy
Interventions for fatigue in peripheral neuropathy (2014) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted2 studies · 406 participantsModerate
Ascorbic acid vs placebo
Change in speed of completion of 9‐hole peg test (in seconds) · people with fatigue in peripheral neuropathy
Interventions for fatigue in peripheral neuropathy (2014) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1 study · 224 participantsModerate
Ascorbic acid vs placebo
Health‐related quality of life 12 or more weeks after commencement of the intervention Change in SF‐36 physical function score SF‐36 Physical Functioning Scale and Physical Component Score · people with fatigue in peripheral neuropathy
Interventions for fatigue in peripheral neuropathy (2014) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted2 studies · 400 participantsModerate
Ascorbic acid vs placebo
Change in participation 12 or more weeks after commencement of intervention (not measured) · people with fatigue in peripheral neuropathy
Interventions for fatigue in peripheral neuropathy (2014) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Ascorbic acid vs placebo
Health‐related quality of life 12 or more weeks after commencement of the intervention Change in mental function score of SF‐36 SF‐36 Mental Component Score · people with fatigue in peripheral neuropathy
Interventions for fatigue in peripheral neuropathy (2014) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1 study · 123 participantsModerate
Ascorbic acid vs placebo
Serious adverse events · people with fatigue in peripheral neuropathy
Interventions for fatigue in peripheral neuropathy (2014) · Cochrane
RR 0.7 [0.39, 1.27]2 studies · 450 participantsModerate
Amantadine vs placebo
Change in fatigue 12 or more weeks after commencement of intervention (not measured) · people with fatigue in Guillain‐Barré syndrome
Interventions for fatigue in peripheral neuropathy (2014) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Amantadine vs placebo
Change in activity limitation 12 or more weeks after commencement of intervention (not measured) · people with fatigue in Guillain‐Barré syndrome
Interventions for fatigue in peripheral neuropathy (2014) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Amantadine vs placebo
Change in participation 12 or more weeks after commencement of intervention using the Rotterdam Handicap Scale. Scale from: 0 to 36. · people with fatigue in Guillain‐Barré syndrome
Interventions for fatigue in peripheral neuropathy (2014) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted74 participantsLow
Amantadine vs placebo
Health related quality of life after 12 or more weeks or more after commencement of intervention (not reported) · people with fatigue in Guillain‐Barré syndrome
Interventions for fatigue in peripheral neuropathy (2014) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Amantadine vs placebo
Serious adverse events · people with fatigue in Guillain‐Barré syndrome
Interventions for fatigue in peripheral neuropathy (2014) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted80 participantsUngraded
Ascorbic acid vs placebo
Reduction in fatigue of at least 1 point on the Fatigue Severity Scale (FSS) between 4 to 12 weeks after commencement of intervention (not measured) · people with fatigue in peripheral neuropathy
Interventions for fatigue in peripheral neuropathy (2014) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Ascorbic acid vs placebo
Change in fatigue 12 or more weeks after commencement of intervention Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) of fatigue · people with fatigue in peripheral neuropathy
Interventions for fatigue in peripheral neuropathy (2014) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted2 studies · 404 participantsModerate
Ascorbic acid vs placebo
Change in activity limitation (ODSS/ONLS) · people with fatigue in peripheral neuropathy
Interventions for fatigue in peripheral neuropathy (2014) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted2 studies · 406 participantsUngraded
Endoscopic vs open or mini‐open carpal tunnel release
Symptom Severity Scale (Levine) at 3 months or less Participants' self assessment questionnaire. Scale from: 1 to 5. · participants with carpal tunnel syndrome
Endoscopic release for carpal tunnel syndrome (2014) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted5 studies · 551 participantsLow
Endoscopic vs open or mini‐open carpal tunnel release
Minor complications events with minor complications · participants with carpal tunnel syndrome
Endoscopic release for carpal tunnel syndrome (2014) · Cochrane
RR 0.55 [0.38, 0.81]18 studies · 1786 participantsLow
Endoscopic vs open or mini‐open carpal tunnel release
Functional Status Scale (Levine) at 3 months or less Participants' self assessment questionnaire. Scale from: 1 to 5. · participants with carpal tunnel syndrome
Endoscopic release for carpal tunnel syndrome (2014) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted5 studies · 551 participantsLow
Endoscopic vs open or mini‐open carpal tunnel release
Grip strength at 3 months or less Dynamometer · participants with carpal tunnel syndrome
Endoscopic release for carpal tunnel syndrome (2014) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted6 studies · 560 participantsModerate
Endoscopic vs open or mini‐open carpal tunnel release
Overall improvement at more than 3 months Participants' subjective evaluation · participants with carpal tunnel syndrome
Endoscopic release for carpal tunnel syndrome (2014) · Cochrane
RR 1.04 [0.95, 1.14]4 studies · 317 participantsLow
Endoscopic vs open or mini‐open carpal tunnel release
Symptom Severity Scale (Levine) at more than 3 months Participants' self assessment questionnaire. Scale from: 1 to 5. · participants with carpal tunnel syndrome
Endoscopic release for carpal tunnel syndrome (2014) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted2 studies · 273 participantsLow
Endoscopic vs open or mini‐open carpal tunnel release
Function Status Scale (Levine) at more than 3 months Participants' self assessment questionnaire. Scale from: 1 to 5. · participants with carpal tunnel syndrome
Endoscopic release for carpal tunnel syndrome (2014) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted2 studies · 273 participantsLow
Endoscopic vs open or mini‐open carpal tunnel release
Grip strength at more than 3 months Dynamometer. Scale from: 0 to 50. · participants with carpal tunnel syndrome
Endoscopic release for carpal tunnel syndrome (2014) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted2 studies · 56 participantsLow