Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

Refine by population, intervention, comparison or outcome
More filters
Evidence found and GRADE certainty

2,411 questions · 2,571 findings · 265 reviews

No studies found 543 · 21.1%GRADE not reported 169 · 6.6%Very low 676 · 26.3%Low 731 · 28.4%Moderate 399 · 15.5%High 53 · 2.1%

Interventions for involving older patients with multi‐morbidity in decision‐making about their health care vs usual care

Adverse event** Less patient involvement as a result of the intervention Not measured · older patients with multi‐morbidity

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Transmural care vs usual follow‐up

Proportion of participants developing a new pressure ulcer · people with spinal cord injury receiving rehabilitation treatment for the first time

It is very uncertain whether transmural care changes pressure ulcer incidence rate compared with usual follow‐up care (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Transmural care vs usual follow‐up

Adverse events: readmission to clinical rehabilitation · people with spinal cord injury receiving rehabilitation treatment for the first time

It is very uncertain whether transmural care changes adverse events: readmission to clinical rehabilitation compared with usual follow‐up care (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Complex information, support and training interventions vs inactive control (usual care care, attention control, waitlist)

Institutional care ‐ nursing home placement · Informal caregivers of people with dementia

It is very uncertain whether complex information, support and training interventions changes institutional care ‐ nursing home placement compared with usual treatment, waiting list or attention control informations (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Primary health professional‐ and community professional‐led interventions vs enhanced usual care

Service utilisation (1 to 6 months post intervention) ‐ incidence of visits to primary care centres due to alcohol consumption (RR > 1 denotes greater risk) · adult patients with harmful or hazardous alcohol or substance use

It is very uncertain whether primary health professional‐ and community professional‐led… changes service utilisation (1 to 6 months post intervention) ‐ incidence of… compared with enhanced usual care (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Early intervention (mobilization or active exercise) vs usual care

Physical performance · critically ill, mechanically ventilated adults
4 findings from 1 review
Show 1 more finding

LHWs vs usual care

Morbidity ‐ care seeking practice hospital record review · patients with reducing mortality and morbidity in children <5 years

LHWs showed no clear difference in morbidity ‐ care seeking practice hospital record review compared with usual care (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Oral care protocol vs usual care or no treatment

Oral mucositis (moderate to severe) · Patients with cancer receiving radiotherapy, chemotherapy or targeted therapies

Oral care protocol showed no clear difference in oral mucositis (moderate to severe) compared with no treatment/usual care; GRADE not reported.

1 finding from 1 review

Oral care protocol vs usual care or no treatment

Oral mucositis (severe) · Patients with cancer receiving radiotherapy, chemotherapy or targeted therapies

Oral care protocol showed no clear difference in oral mucositis (severe) compared with no treatment/usual care; GRADE not reported.

1 finding from 1 review