Transmural care vs usual follow‐up: Adverse events: readmission to clinical rehabilitation
It is very uncertain whether transmural care changes adverse events: readmission to clinical rehabilitation compared with usual follow‐up care (very low certainty).
What each review found
Include earlier review versions| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Transmural care vs usual follow‐up care Adverse events: readmission to clinical rehabilitation · people with spinal cord injury receiving rehabilitation treatment for the first time It is very uncertain whether transmural care changes adverse events: readmission to clinical rehabilitation compared with usual follow‐up care (very low certainty). Organisation of health services for preventing and treating pressure ulcers (2018) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | RR 2 [0.19, 20.93] | 1 study · 62 participants | Very low |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Organisation of health services for preventing and treating pressure ulcers 2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | Not reported | list not extracted yet | Not assessed |
Studies behind the findings
None of these reviews ties its included studies to this outcome in the data here. Cochrane reviews and reviews with headline outcomes only do not list their studies yet.
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.