Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

Refine by population, intervention, comparison or outcome
More filters
Evidence found and GRADE certainty

1,230 questions · 1,303 findings · 326 reviews · Headline outcomes only

No studies found 73 · 5.6%GRADE not reported 21 · 1.6%Very low 497 · 38.1%Low 403 · 30.9%Moderate 245 · 18.8%High 64 · 4.9%

Autologous myeloablative selective HSCT vs cyclophosphamide

Skin thickness – mRSS Scale 0–51 in which a higher number is worse skin thickening · people with systemic sclerosis

Autologous myeloablative selective HSCT probably leads to higher skin thickness – mRSS Scale 0–51 in which a higher number is worse… compared with cyclophosphamide (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Whole‐facility changes: Home‐like models vs traditional environment

Health‐related quality of life Dementia‐specific quality of life measure (QUALIDEM) (higher scores = better) · older adults living in long‐term residential care including, but not limited to, dementia‐specific care settings
1 finding from 1 review

Total hip arthroplasty vs hemiarthroplasty

Functional status, early (within 4 months): using HHS (range from 0 to 100) and Johansen hip score (range from 0 to 100); higher scores indicate better function · adults with displaced and undisplaced hip fractures
1 finding from 1 review

Cemented vs uncemented hemiarthroplasty

Functional status, early (within 4 months): using HHS (range from 0 to 100) and Johansen hip score (range from 0 to 100); higher scores indicate better function · adults with displaced and undisplaced hip fractures
1 finding from 1 review