Question · asked by 1 review
Family‐centred care vs control: Family health‐enhancing lifestyle or behavioural outcomes Timing: the longest time point available for each study Direction of effect: higher beneficial
What each review found
Include earlier review versions| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Family‐centred care vs any control Family health‐enhancing lifestyle or behavioural outcomes Timing: the longest time point available for each study Direction of effect: higher beneficial · Indigenous children aged < 5 years Family‐centred interventions for Indigenous early childhood well‐being by primary healthcare services (2022) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | no estimate extracted | 9 studies · 1969 participants | Very low |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Family‐centred interventions for Indigenous early childhood well‐being by primary healthcare services 2022 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | Not reported | list not extracted yet | Not assessed |
Studies behind the findings
None of these reviews ties its included studies to this outcome in the data here. Cochrane reviews and reviews with headline outcomes only do not list their studies yet.
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.