Cochrane · systematic review · CD012463
Family‐centred interventions for Indigenous early childhood well‐being by primary healthcare services
Strobel, NA, Chamberlain, C, Campbell, SK, et al. · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · 2022 · Cochrane Library
Consumers and CommunicationAMSTAR 2: not assessed
SoF tableOnly the outcomes this review put in its Summary of Findings table are listed (the Cochrane Handbook caps them at about seven per comparison). Its other analyses are not shown here.
Questions
6
current version
GRADE rated
6
No studies
0
Included studies
NR
No studies 0 · 0%Ungraded 0 · 0%Very low 6 · 100%Low 0 · 0%Moderate 0 · 0%High 0 · 0%
Ungraded means an effect was reported without a GRADE rating; it is not a gap. No studies means the review found nothing to answer the question. The six categories are a display order, not a score.
Questions and results
Family‐centred care compared to any control for Indigenous children aged less than five years
Population: Indigenous children aged < 5 years
| Outcome | Effect | Evidence | Status / GRADE |
|---|---|---|---|
Overall health and well‐being Timing: the longest time point available for each study Direction of effect: higher beneficial Family‐centred care vs any control | no estimate extracted | 11 studies · 2386 participants | Very low Downgraded: risk of bias |
Psychological health and emotional behaviour of children Timing: the longest time point available for each study Direction of effect: higher beneficial Family‐centred care vs any control | no estimate extracted | 2 studies · 384 participants | Very low Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision |
Physical health and developmental health outcomes of children Timing: the longest time point available for each study Direction of effect: higher beneficial Family‐centred care vs any control | no estimate extracted | 8 studies · 1961 participants | Very low Downgraded: risk of bias |
Family health‐enhancing lifestyle or behavioural outcomes Timing: the longest time point available for each study Direction of effect: higher beneficial Family‐centred care vs any control | no estimate extracted | 9 studies · 1969 participants | Very low Downgraded: risk of bias |
Psychological health of parent/carer Timing: the longest time point available for each study Direction of effect: higher beneficial Family‐centred care vs any control | no estimate extracted | 5 studies · 975 participants | Very low Downgraded: risk of bias |
Adverse events or harms Direction of effect: lower beneficial Family‐centred care vs any control | no estimate extracted | 2 studies · 2 participants | Very low Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision |