Dental caries susceptibility · Individuals assessed for dental caries (cases with caries/high caries vs. caries-free or low/very-low-caries controls)
No significant association between G allele vs A allele of ENAM rs1264848 and dental caries susceptibility (G vs A model: OR 0.93, 95% CI 0.65-1.32); certainty not graded.
2 findings from 1 review
Dental caries susceptibility · Individuals assessed for dental caries (cases with caries/high caries vs. caries-free or low/very-low-caries controls)
No significant association between AG genotype vs AA genotype of ENAM rs3796704 and dental caries susceptibility (AG vs AA model: OR 0.35, 95% CI 0.07-1.74) in the Age group: Children subgroup; certainty not graded.
4 findings from 1 review
Show 1 more finding
Intervention not reported
Absence of recurrent caries success rate
1 finding from 1 review
Dental caries susceptibility · Individuals assessed for dental caries (cases with caries/high caries vs. caries-free or low/very-low-caries controls)
The CT + TT genotype (T-allele carriers) of AMELX rs17878486 was associated with increased dental caries risk (CT + TT vs CC model: OR 5.72, 95% CI 2.83-11.59) after excluding the outlier study (Ergoz 2014); certainty not graded.
7 findings from 1 review
Show 4 more findings
Dental caries susceptibility · Individuals assessed for dental caries (cases with caries/high caries vs. caries-free or low/very-low-caries controls)
No significant association between AG genotype vs AA genotype of LTF rs1126478 and dental caries susceptibility (AG vs AA model: OR 1.07, 95% CI 0.80-1.43) in the Ethnicity: Asian subgroup; certainty not graded.
3 findings from 1 review
Dental caries susceptibility · Individuals assessed for dental caries (cases with caries/high caries vs. caries-free or low/very-low-caries controls)
No significant association between CT + TT genotype (T-allele carriers) vs CC genotype of AMELX rs6639060 and dental caries susceptibility (CT + TT vs CC model: OR 1.14, 95% CI 0.56-2.29) in the Ethnicity: Caucasian subgroup; certainty not graded.
3 findings from 1 review
Intervention not reported
Absence of recurrent caries success rate
1 finding from 1 review
Dental caries susceptibility · Ethnicity: Caucasian (n=1) individuals with caries/high caries and controls
The pooled odds ratio was 1.04 (95% CI 0.43 to 2.51).
1 finding from 1 review
OR 1.04 [0.43, 2.51]
1 study
GRADE not reported
Dental caries susceptibility · Individuals assessed for dental caries (cases with caries/high caries vs. caries-free or low/very-low-caries controls)
No significant association between TT genotype vs CC genotype of AMELX rs946252 and dental caries susceptibility (TT vs CC model: OR 1.54, 95% CI 0.61-3.92) in the Age group: Children subgroup; certainty not graded.
4 findings from 1 review
Show 1 more finding
Marginal integrity success rate · Children with primary molars requiring proximal (Class II) restorations
After trim-and-fill adjustment the marginal integrity success rate was 0.881 (95% CI 0.832-0.916; ungraded), a negligible change.
1 finding from 1 review
Intervention not reported
Absence of recurrent caries success rate
1 finding from 1 review
Dental caries susceptibility · Individuals assessed for dental caries (cases with caries/high caries vs. caries-free or low/very-low-caries controls)
No significant association between GG genotype vs AA genotype of ENAM rs3796704 and dental caries susceptibility (GG vs AA model: OR 1.86, 95% CI 0.96-3.62); certainty not graded.
3 findings from 1 review
Incidence of microleakage · Er,Cr:YSGG laser-prepared cavities restored with self-etch adhesive systems (in vitro)
At the dentin margin, prior acid etching with self-etch adhesives significantly reduced microleakage (RR 2.44, 95% CI 1.38-4.34; ungraded).
2 findings from 1 review
RR 2.44 [1.38, 4.34]
2 studies
GRADE not reported
RR 3.00 [1.54, 5.83]
2 studies
GRADE not reported
Dental caries susceptibility · Individuals assessed for dental caries (cases with caries/high caries vs. caries-free or low/very-low-caries controls)
No significant association between AG + GG genotype (G-allele carriers) vs AA genotype of LTF rs1126478 and dental caries susceptibility (AG + GG vs AA model: OR 0.99, 95% CI 0.81-1.23) in the Age group: Children subgroup; certainty not graded.
4 findings from 1 review
Show 1 more finding
Intervention not reported
Anatomic form success rate
1 finding from 1 review
Dental caries susceptibility · Individuals assessed for dental caries (cases with caries/high caries vs. caries-free or low/very-low-caries controls)
No significant association between GG genotype vs AA genotype of ENAM rs1264848 and dental caries susceptibility (GG vs AA model: OR 0.58, 95% CI 0.19-1.82) in the Age group: Children subgroup; certainty not graded.
5 findings from 1 review
Show 2 more findings
Intervention not reported
Marginal integrity success rate
1 finding from 1 review
Dental caries (by severity) · Human subjects stratified by dental caries severity and caries-free controls
rs1126478 was inversely associated with low-level dental caries in a single study (OR 0.65, 95% CI 0.47 to 0.90; ungraded).
5 findings from 1 review
OR 0.65 [0.47, 0.90]
1 study
GRADE not reported
OR 1.20 [0.94, 1.54]
1 study
GRADE not reported
OR 1.04 [0.80, 1.34]
1 study
GRADE not reported
Show 2 more findings
OR 0.78 [0.70, 0.87]
1 study
GRADE not reported
OR 0.72 [0.65, 0.80]
1 study
GRADE not reported
Early childhood caries (ECC) · Children aged 6 years or younger (preschool children)
Adjusted analyses also showed no association between low birth weight and early childhood caries (adjusted OR 1.05, 95% CI 0.71 to 1.57); certainty not graded.
2 findings from 1 review
Incidence of microleakage · Human teeth requiring cavity preparation and restoration (in vitro)
At the dentin margin, microleakage did not differ significantly between bur and Er,Cr:YSGG laser preparation (RR 1.26, 95% CI 0.67-2.38; ungraded).
2 findings from 1 review
RR 1.26 [0.67, 2.38]
6 studies
GRADE not reported
RR 1.27 [0.44, 3.67]
5 studies
GRADE not reported