Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

Refine by population, intervention, comparison or outcome
More filters
Evidence found and GRADE certainty

380 questions · 393 findings · 51 reviews

No studies found 96 · 24.4%GRADE not reported 45 · 11.5%Very low 64 · 16.3%Low 77 · 19.6%Moderate 63 · 16%High 48 · 12.2%

Educational intervention vs no educational intervention

Uncorrected visual acuity deficit due to refractive error · school‐age children and adolescents

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

2 findings from 1 review

Intervention not reported

Chlamydia prevalence (general population) Outcome was chlamydia test positivity after 3 yearly invitations in intervention clusters vs 1 invitation in control areas. Uptake was too low for chlamydia positivity to be considered an unbiased estimate... · healthy adults

The intervention showed no clear difference in chlamydia prevalence (general population) Outcome was chlamydia test… (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Intervention not reported

Chlamydia prevalence (high risk population) Outcome was prevalence of positive chlamydia tests in repeated cross‐sectional surveys of women tested at sex venues after 4 years of intervention. · healthy adults

The intervention may leads to lower chlamydia prevalence (high risk population) Outcome was prevalence… (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Intervention not reported

Incidence of pelvic inflammatory disease (PID) at 12 months (intention‐to‐treat) Outcome was clinically diagnosed PID reported by the participant or extracted from medical records, pharmacy records or hospital discharge coding. Outcome very likely... · healthy adults

The intervention probably leads to lower incidence of pelvic inflammatory disease (PID) at 12 months… (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Intervention not reported

Incidence of epididymitis in men at 12 months (intention‐to‐treat) Outcome was epididymitis diagnosed in hospital and abstracted from hospital discharge coding. · healthy adults

It is very uncertain whether the intervention changes incidence of epididymitis in men at 12 months (intention‐to‐treat)… (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Intervention not reported

Identification of IPV by health professionals (assessed immediately or up to 1 month) · women attending healthcare settings for any health‐related reason
1 finding from 1 review

Intervention not reported

Identification of IPV by type of healthcare setting ‐ Antenatal clinics · women attending healthcare settings for any health‐related reason
1 finding from 1 review

Intervention not reported

Identification of IPV by type of healthcare setting ‐ Maternal health services · women attending healthcare settings for any health‐related reason
1 finding from 1 review

Intervention not reported

Identification of IPV by type of healthcare setting ‐ Emergency departments · women attending healthcare settings for any health‐related reason
1 finding from 1 review

Intervention not reported

Identification of IPV by type of healthcare setting ‐ Hospital‐based primary care · women attending healthcare settings for any health‐related reason
1 finding from 1 review

Intervention not reported

Identification of IPV (non‐clinically based, assessed immediately) · women attending healthcare settings for any health‐related reason
1 finding from 1 review

Intervention not reported

Outcomes1 · adult male patients

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Intervention not reported

All‐cause mortality · adult male patients

The intervention showed no clear difference in all‐cause mortality (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Intervention not reported

Prostate cancer‐specific mortality · adult male patients

The intervention showed no clear difference in prostate cancer‐specific mortality (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Intervention not reported

Prostate cancer diagnosis · adult male patients

The intervention may leads to higher prostate cancer diagnosis (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Intervention not reported

Tumour stage (localised T1‐T2, N0, M0) · adult male patients

The intervention may leads to higher tumour stage (localised T1‐T2, N0, M0) (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review