Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

Refine by population, intervention, comparison or outcome
More filters
Evidence found and GRADE certainty

1,268 questions · 1,343 findings · 197 reviews

No studies found 317 · 23.6%GRADE not reported 189 · 14.1%Very low 356 · 26.5%Low 271 · 20.2%Moderate 173 · 12.9%High 37 · 2.8%

Summary of Findings Table ‐ Enoxaparin vs no enoxaparin

Adverse events: clinically relevant non‐major bleeding / heparin‐induced thrombocytopenia ‐ not reported · adults with acute lymphoblastic leukaemia treated with asparaginase‐based chemotherapy

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Targeted or adjustable individualized fortification vs standard non‐individualized fortification

Presence of osteopenia · promoting growth and development in very low birth weight infants receiving human milk

It is very uncertain whether targeted or adjustable individualized fortification changes osteopenia compared with standard non‐individualized fortification (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Primary (complete) wound closure vs Secondary (partial) wound closure

Maximal mouth opening (interincisal distance) · Adults with mandibular third molars requiring removal

Primary (complete) wound closure showed no clear difference in maximum mouth opening (mean) compared with secondary (partial) wound closure; GRADE not reported.

1 finding from 1 review

Piezoelectric bone removal vs Conventional rotary handpiece

Trismus / maximum mouth opening (mean) · Adults with mandibular third molars requiring removal

Piezoelectric bone removal led to higher trismus / maximum mouth opening (mean) compared with conventional rotary handpiece; GRADE not reported.

1 finding from 1 review