Clinical improvement: aetiological approach · sexually active adults
Macrolides showed no clear difference in clinical improvement: aetiological approach compared with any other antibiotic (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Microbiological cure · sexually active adults
Macrolides showed no clear difference in microbiological cure compared with any other antibiotic (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Minor adverse events · sexually active adults
It is very uncertain whether macrolides changes minor adverse events compared with any other antibiotic (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Clinical cure: syndromic approach · sexually active adults
Macrolide (erythromycin) showed no clear difference in clinical cure: syndromic approach compared with any other macrolide (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Clinical cure: aetiological approach · sexually active adults
Macrolide (erythromycin) showed no clear difference in clinical cure: aetiological approach compared with any other macrolide (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Minor adverse events · sexually active adults
It is very uncertain whether macrolide (erythromycin) changes minor adverse events compared with any other macrolide (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Function · patients with acute, subacute and chronic neck pain
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Chronic neck pain Short‐term · patients with acute, subacute and chronic neck pain
Manipulation (thoracic) showed no clear difference in chronic neck pain Short‐term compared with inactive control (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
QoL · patients with acute, subacute and chronic neck pain
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Pain · patients with acute, subacute and chronic neck pain
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Acute and subacute neck pain Short‐term · patients with acute, subacute and chronic neck pain
Manipulation (thoracic) showed no clear difference in acute and subacute neck pain Short‐term compared with inactive control (moderate certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Chronic neck pain Intermediate‐term · patients with acute, subacute and chronic neck pain
Manipulation (thoracic) showed no clear difference in chronic neck pain Intermediate‐term compared with inactive control (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
CTS symptoms (Boston CTS questionnaire) ‐ short‐term improvement: < 3 monthsScale: 1 to 5, higher is worse · carpal tunnel syndrome
1 finding from 1 review
CTS symptoms (Boston CTS questionnaire) ‐ long‐term improvement: > 3 monthsScale: 1 to 5, higher is worse · carpal tunnel syndrome
1 finding from 1 review
Function (Boston CTS questionnaire) ‐ Long‐term improvement: > 3 monthsScale: 1 to 5, higher is worse · carpal tunnel syndrome
1 finding from 1 review
Overall improvement (improved/not improved or worsened) ‐ short‐term improvement: < 3 months · carpal tunnel syndrome
SPLINT may leads to higher overall improvement (improved/not improved or worsened) ‐ short‐term… compared with NO ACTIVE TREATMENT (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Health‐related quality of life ‐ Long‐term improvement: > 3 months · carpal tunnel syndrome
1 finding from 1 review
Adverse effects · carpal tunnel syndrome
SPLINT showed no clear difference in adverse effects compared with NO ACTIVE TREATMENT (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Referral for surgery · carpal tunnel syndrome
It is very uncertain whether SPLINT changes referral for surgery compared with NO ACTIVE TREATMENT (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Pain intensity (Higher scores indicate higher pain intensity) · chronic pain (excluding headache) in adults
1 finding from 1 review