Diastolic blood pressure · The trials included a total of 33,840 participants with cerebrovascular disease. The mean or median age of participants ranged from 60…
1 finding from 1 review
The event rate of intensive care delirium within 28 days. · critically ill patients 18 years or older demanding mechanical ventilation within the first 72 hours (Page 2013) or anticipated needing…
Haloperidol showed no clear difference in the event rate of intensive care delirium within 28 days. compared with placebo (moderate certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
In‐hospital mortality within 28 days. · critically ill patients 18 years or older demanding mechanical ventilation within the first 72 hours (Page 2013) or anticipated needing…
Haloperidol showed no clear difference in in‐hospital mortality within 28 days. compared with placebo (moderate certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Number of delirium ‐ and coma‐free days (within 28 days) measured by CAM‐ICU or ICDSC · critically ill patients 18 years or older demanding mechanical ventilation within the first 72 hours (Page 2013) or anticipated needing…
1 finding from 1 review
Ventilator‐free days up to day 28 · critically ill patients 18 years or older demanding mechanical ventilation within the first 72 hours (Page 2013) or anticipated needing…
1 finding from 1 review
Duration of ICU stay · critically ill patients 18 years or older demanding mechanical ventilation within the first 72 hours (Page 2013) or anticipated needing…
1 finding from 1 review
Cognitive impairment · critically ill patients 18 years or older demanding mechanical ventilation within the first 72 hours (Page 2013) or anticipated needing…
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Adverse events · critically ill patients 18 years or older demanding mechanical ventilation within the first 72 hours (Page 2013) or anticipated needing…
1 finding from 1 review
Intervention not reported
Tobacco use · children and young people aged 0 to 18 years
The intervention showed no clear difference in tobacco use (moderate certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Intervention not reported
Alcohol use · children and young people aged 0 to 18 years
The intervention showed no clear difference in alcohol use (moderate certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Intervention not reported
Cannabis use · children and young people aged 0 to 18 years
The intervention showed no clear difference in cannabis use (moderate certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Intervention not reported
Illicit drug use · children and young people aged 0 to 18 years
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Intervention not reported
Antisocial behaviour · children and young people aged 0 to 18 years
The intervention showed no clear difference in antisocial behaviour (moderate certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Intervention not reported
Sexual risk behaviour · children and young people aged 0 to 18 years
The intervention showed no clear difference in sexual risk behaviour (moderate certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Intervention not reported
Physical activity · children and young people aged 0 to 18 years
The intervention showed no clear difference in physical activity (moderate certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Intervention not reported
Tobacco use · children and young people aged 0 to 18 years
The intervention showed no clear difference in tobacco use (moderate certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Intervention not reported
Alcohol use · children and young people aged 0 to 18 years
The intervention showed no clear difference in alcohol use (moderate certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Intervention not reported
Cannabis use · children and young people aged 0 to 18 years
The intervention showed no clear difference in cannabis use (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Intervention not reported
Illicit drug use · children and young people aged 0 to 18 years
The intervention showed no clear difference in illicit drug use (moderate certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Intervention not reported
Alcohol use · children and young people aged 0 to 18 years
The intervention showed no clear difference in alcohol use (moderate certainty).
1 finding from 1 review