Gap finder

Search review questions

Each row is one question a systematic review asked: who, what, compared with what, and which outcome, with the effect it found and how certain that is. Words match anywhere in the field.

Limit to evidence status or GRADE (optional)

1,558 questions in 115 reviews · Vascular

current versions
No studies 346 · 22.2%Ungraded 90 · 5.8%Very low 281 · 18%Low 477 · 30.6%Moderate 313 · 20.1%High 51 · 3.3%

Ungraded means an effect was reported without a GRADE rating; it is not a gap. No studies means the review found nothing to answer the question. The six categories are a display order, not a score.

QuestionEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Retrievable vena caval filters with anticoagulation vs anticoagulation
Filter‐related complications (up to 232 days) · participants who sustained multiple traumatic injuriesa
Vena caval filters for the prevention of pulmonary embolism (2020) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1 study · 240 participantsModerate
Atherectomy vs balloon angioplasty
Primary patency ( · people with PAD
Atherectomy for peripheral arterial disease (2020) · Cochrane
RR 1.06 [0.94, 1.2]3 studies · 186 participantsVery low
Atherectomy vs balloon angioplasty with primary stenting
Mortality ( · people with PAD
Atherectomy for peripheral arterial disease (2020) · Cochrane
RR 0.38 [0.04, 3.23]1 study · 155 participantsVery low
Atherectomy vs balloon angioplasty with primary stenting
Fatal and non‐fatal cardiovascular events ( · people with PAD
Atherectomy for peripheral arterial disease (2020) · Cochrane
RR 0.38 [0.04, 3.23]1 study · 155 participantsVery low
Atherectomy vs balloon angioplasty with primary stenting
TVR ( · people with PAD
Atherectomy for peripheral arterial disease (2020) · Cochrane
RR 2.27 [0.95, 5.46]1 study · 155 participantsVery low
Atherectomy vs balloon angioplasty with primary stenting
TVR ( · people with PAD
Atherectomy for peripheral arterial disease (2020) · Cochrane
RR 2.05 [0.96, 4.37]1 study · 155 participantsVery low
Atherectomy vs balloon angioplasty with primary stenting
Complication rates ( · people with PAD
Atherectomy for peripheral arterial disease (2020) · Cochrane
RR 7.04 [0.8, 62.23]1 study · 155 participantsVery low
Atherectomy vs balloon angioplasty
Primary patency ( · people with PAD
Atherectomy for peripheral arterial disease (2020) · Cochrane
RR 1.2 [0.78, 1.84]2 studies · 149 participantsVery low
Atherectomy vs balloon angioplasty
Mortality ( · people with PAD
Atherectomy for peripheral arterial disease (2020) · Cochrane
RR 0.5 [0.1, 2.66]3 studies · 210 participantsVery low
Atherectomy vs balloon angioplasty
Fatal and non‐fatal cardiovascular events ( · people with PAD
Atherectomy for peripheral arterial disease (2020) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted2 studies · 160 participantsVery low
Atherectomy vs balloon angioplasty
TVR ( · people with PAD
Atherectomy for peripheral arterial disease (2020) · Cochrane
RR 0.51 [0.06, 4.42]2 studies · 136 participantsVery low
Atherectomy vs balloon angioplasty
TVR ( · people with PAD
Atherectomy for peripheral arterial disease (2020) · Cochrane
RR 0.59 [0.25, 1.42]3 studies · 176 participantsVery low
Atherectomy vs balloon angioplasty
Complication rates ( · people with PAD
Atherectomy for peripheral arterial disease (2020) · Cochrane
RR 0.69 [0.28, 1.68]6 studies · 387 participantsVery low
Atherectomy vs balloon angioplasty with primary stenting
Primary patency ( · people with PAD
Atherectomy for peripheral arterial disease (2020) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Atherectomy vs balloon angioplasty with primary stenting
Primary patency ( · people with PAD
Atherectomy for peripheral arterial disease (2020) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Angioplasty vs primary stenting
Technical success (immediate) · patients with symptomatic Iliac artery lesions
Angioplasty versus stenting for iliac artery lesions (2020) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted2 studies · 391 participantsLow
Angioplasty vs primary stenting
Incidence of complications (immediate) · patients with symptomatic Iliac artery lesions
Angioplasty versus stenting for iliac artery lesions (2020) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted2 studies · 391 participantsLow
Angioplasty vs primary stenting
Improvement in the stage of PAD according to Rutherford's criteria (one year) · patients with symptomatic Iliac artery lesions
Angioplasty versus stenting for iliac artery lesions (2020) · Cochrane
OR 1.03 [0.47, 2.27]1 study · 157 participantsLow
Angioplasty vs primary stenting
Primary patency (two years) · patients with symptomatic Iliac artery lesions
Angioplasty versus stenting for iliac artery lesions (2020) · Cochrane
OR 1.6 [0.34, 7.44]1 study · 57 participantsLow
Angioplasty vs primary stenting
Reinterventions (six to eight years) · patients with symptomatic Iliac artery lesions
Angioplasty versus stenting for iliac artery lesions (2020) · Cochrane
OR 1.22 [0.67, 2.23]1 study · 279 participantsLow
Angioplasty vs primary stenting
Resolution of symptoms and signs (one year) · patients with symptomatic Iliac artery lesions
Angioplasty versus stenting for iliac artery lesions (2020) · Cochrane
OR 1.14 [0.65, 2]1 study · 219 participantsLow
Angioplasty vs primary stenting
Improvement in walking distance as reported by the patient · patients with symptomatic Iliac artery lesions
Angioplasty versus stenting for iliac artery lesions (2020) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
DOAC vs placebo
Symptomatic VTE · ambulatory cancer patients receiving chemotherapy
Primary prophylaxis for venous thromboembolism in ambulatory cancer patients receiving chemotherapy (2020) · Cochrane
RR 0.43 [0.18, 1.06]3 studies · 1526 participantsLow
Low‐molecular‐weight heparin vs no thromboprophylaxis
Symptomatic PE · ambulatory cancer patients receiving chemotherapy
Primary prophylaxis for venous thromboembolism in ambulatory cancer patients receiving chemotherapy (2020) · Cochrane
RR 0.6 [0.42, 0.88]8 studies · 5324 participantsModerate
Low‐molecular‐weight heparin vs no thromboprophylaxis
Symptomatic DVT · ambulatory cancer patients receiving chemotherapy
Primary prophylaxis for venous thromboembolism in ambulatory cancer patients receiving chemotherapy (2020) · Cochrane
RR 0.48 [0.35, 0.67]9 studies · 5408 participantsHigh
Low‐molecular‐weight heparin vs no thromboprophylaxis
Any VTE · ambulatory cancer patients receiving chemotherapy
Primary prophylaxis for venous thromboembolism in ambulatory cancer patients receiving chemotherapy (2020) · Cochrane
RR 0.57 [0.46, 0.71]10 studies · 5743 participantsHigh
Low‐molecular‐weight heparin vs no thromboprophylaxis
1‐year overall mortality · ambulatory cancer patients receiving chemotherapy
Primary prophylaxis for venous thromboembolism in ambulatory cancer patients receiving chemotherapy (2020) · Cochrane
RR 0.94 [0.83, 1.07]9 studies · 2681 participantsLow
Low‐molecular‐weight heparin vs no thromboprophylaxis
Clinically relevant bleeding · ambulatory cancer patients receiving chemotherapy
Primary prophylaxis for venous thromboembolism in ambulatory cancer patients receiving chemotherapy (2020) · Cochrane
RR 3.4 [1.2, 9.63]4 studies · 3105 participantsModerate
Low‐molecular‐weight heparin vs with active control (1)
Symptomatic VTE · ambulatory cancer patients receiving chemotherapy
Primary prophylaxis for venous thromboembolism in ambulatory cancer patients receiving chemotherapy (2020) · Cochrane
RR 2.89 [0.12, 66.75]1 study · 51 participantsLow
Low‐molecular‐weight heparin vs with active control (1)
Major bleeding · ambulatory cancer patients receiving chemotherapy
Primary prophylaxis for venous thromboembolism in ambulatory cancer patients receiving chemotherapy (2020) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Low‐molecular‐weight heparin vs with active control (1)
Symptomatic PE · ambulatory cancer patients receiving chemotherapy
Primary prophylaxis for venous thromboembolism in ambulatory cancer patients receiving chemotherapy (2020) · Cochrane
RR 2.89 [0.12, 66.75]NRUngraded
Low‐molecular‐weight heparin vs with active control (1)
Symptomatic DVT · ambulatory cancer patients receiving chemotherapy
Primary prophylaxis for venous thromboembolism in ambulatory cancer patients receiving chemotherapy (2020) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Low‐molecular‐weight heparin vs with active control (1)
Any VTE · ambulatory cancer patients receiving chemotherapy
Primary prophylaxis for venous thromboembolism in ambulatory cancer patients receiving chemotherapy (2020) · Cochrane
RR 4.81 [0.24, 95.58]NRUngraded
DOAC vs placebo
Major bleeding · ambulatory cancer patients receiving chemotherapy
Primary prophylaxis for venous thromboembolism in ambulatory cancer patients receiving chemotherapy (2020) · Cochrane
RR 1.74 [0.82, 3.68]3 studies · 1494 participantsModerate
Low‐molecular‐weight heparin vs with active control (1)
1‐year overall mortality · ambulatory cancer patients receiving chemotherapy
Primary prophylaxis for venous thromboembolism in ambulatory cancer patients receiving chemotherapy (2020) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Low‐molecular‐weight heparin vs with active control (1)
Clinically relevant bleeding · ambulatory cancer patients receiving chemotherapy
Primary prophylaxis for venous thromboembolism in ambulatory cancer patients receiving chemotherapy (2020) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Low‐molecular‐weight heparin vs active control (2)
Symptomatic VTE · ambulatory cancer patients receiving chemotherapy
Primary prophylaxis for venous thromboembolism in ambulatory cancer patients receiving chemotherapy (2020) · Cochrane
RR 0.51 [0.22, 1.17]2 studies · 781 participantsModerate
Low‐molecular‐weight heparin vs active control (2)
Major bleeding · ambulatory cancer patients receiving chemotherapy
Primary prophylaxis for venous thromboembolism in ambulatory cancer patients receiving chemotherapy (2020) · Cochrane
RR 0.14 [0.01, 2.76]2 studies · 781 participantsLow
Low‐molecular‐weight heparin vs active control (2)
Symptomatic PE · ambulatory cancer patients receiving chemotherapy
Primary prophylaxis for venous thromboembolism in ambulatory cancer patients receiving chemotherapy (2020) · Cochrane
RR 0.13 [0.02, 1.03]2 studies · 781 participantsModerate
Low‐molecular‐weight heparin vs active control (2)
Symptomatic DVT · ambulatory cancer patients receiving chemotherapy
Primary prophylaxis for venous thromboembolism in ambulatory cancer patients receiving chemotherapy (2020) · Cochrane
RR 0.81 [0.32, 2.04]2 studies · 781 participantsModerate
Low‐molecular‐weight heparin vs active control (2)
Any VTE · ambulatory cancer patients receiving chemotherapy
Primary prophylaxis for venous thromboembolism in ambulatory cancer patients receiving chemotherapy (2020) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Low‐molecular‐weight heparin vs active control (2)
1‐year overall mortality · ambulatory cancer patients receiving chemotherapy
Primary prophylaxis for venous thromboembolism in ambulatory cancer patients receiving chemotherapy (2020) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Low‐molecular‐weight heparin vs active control (2)
Clinically relevant bleeding · ambulatory cancer patients receiving chemotherapy
Primary prophylaxis for venous thromboembolism in ambulatory cancer patients receiving chemotherapy (2020) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Low‐molecular‐weight heparin vs active control (3)
Symptomatic VTE · ambulatory cancer patients receiving chemotherapy
Primary prophylaxis for venous thromboembolism in ambulatory cancer patients receiving chemotherapy (2020) · Cochrane
RR 0.33 [0.14, 0.83]1 study · 439 participantsHigh
DOAC vs placebo
Symptomatic PE · ambulatory cancer patients receiving chemotherapy
Primary prophylaxis for venous thromboembolism in ambulatory cancer patients receiving chemotherapy (2020) · Cochrane
RR 0.38 [0.1, 1.47]3 studies · 1526 participantsLow
Low‐molecular‐weight heparin vs active control (3)
Major bleeding · ambulatory cancer patients receiving chemotherapy
Primary prophylaxis for venous thromboembolism in ambulatory cancer patients receiving chemotherapy (2020) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Low‐molecular‐weight heparin vs active control (3)
Symptomatic PE · ambulatory cancer patients receiving chemotherapy
Primary prophylaxis for venous thromboembolism in ambulatory cancer patients receiving chemotherapy (2020) · Cochrane
RR 0.11 [0.01, 2.06]1 study · 439 participantsLow
Low‐molecular‐weight heparin vs active control (3)
Symptomatic DVT · ambulatory cancer patients receiving chemotherapy
Primary prophylaxis for venous thromboembolism in ambulatory cancer patients receiving chemotherapy (2020) · Cochrane
RR 0.43 [0.17, 1.1]1 study · 439 participantsModerate
Low‐molecular‐weight heparin vs active control (3)
Any VTE · ambulatory cancer patients receiving chemotherapy
Primary prophylaxis for venous thromboembolism in ambulatory cancer patients receiving chemotherapy (2020) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Low‐molecular‐weight heparin vs active control (3)
1‐year overall mortality · ambulatory cancer patients receiving chemotherapy
Primary prophylaxis for venous thromboembolism in ambulatory cancer patients receiving chemotherapy (2020) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies