Cochrane · systematic review · CD007561
Angioplasty versus stenting for iliac artery lesions
Jongsma, H, Bekken, J, Ayez, N, et al. · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · 2020 · Cochrane Library
VascularAMSTAR 2: not assessed
SoF tableOnly the outcomes this review put in its Summary of Findings table are listed (the Cochrane Handbook caps them at about seven per comparison). Its other analyses are not shown here.
Questions
7
current version
GRADE rated
6
No studies
1
Included studies
NR
No studies 1 · 14.3%Ungraded 0 · 0%Very low 0 · 0%Low 6 · 85.7%Moderate 0 · 0%High 0 · 0%
Ungraded means an effect was reported without a GRADE rating; it is not a gap. No studies means the review found nothing to answer the question. The six categories are a display order, not a score.
Questions and results
Angioplasty compared to primary stenting for iliac artery stenotic lesions
Population: patients with symptomatic Iliac artery lesions
| Outcome | Effect | Evidence | Status / GRADE |
|---|---|---|---|
Technical success (immediate) Angioplasty vs primary stenting | no estimate extracted | 2 studies · 391 participants | Low Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, indirectness |
Incidence of complications (immediate) Angioplasty vs primary stenting | no estimate extracted | 2 studies · 391 participants | Low Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, indirectness |
Improvement in the stage of PAD according to Rutherford's criteria (one year) Angioplasty vs primary stenting | OR 1.03 [0.47, 2.27] | 1 study · 157 participants | Low Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, indirectness |
Primary patency (two years) Angioplasty vs primary stenting | OR 1.6 [0.34, 7.44] | 1 study · 57 participants | Low Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, indirectness |
Reinterventions (six to eight years) Angioplasty vs primary stenting | OR 1.22 [0.67, 2.23] | 1 study · 279 participants | Low Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, indirectness |
Resolution of symptoms and signs (one year) Angioplasty vs primary stenting | OR 1.14 [0.65, 2] | 1 study · 219 participants | Low Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, indirectness |
Improvement in walking distance as reported by the patient Angioplasty vs primary stenting | no estimate extracted | NR | No studies |