evidencegaps
Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

Refine by population, intervention, comparison or outcome
More filters
Evidence found and GRADE certainty

4,410 questions · 8,901 findings · 1,091 reviews

Sort:Best matchNewestHighest certaintyDownload CSV
No studies found 1,687 · 19%GRADE not reported 1,469 · 16.5%Very low 1,969 · 22.1%Low 2,060 · 23.1%Moderate 1,302 · 14.6%High 414 · 4.7%

Ranked among the 5,000 newest matching findings; add words or filters to narrow the search.

Longer follow-up vs Shorter follow-up

Annual increment in DMFS (D3) · Children and adolescents with permanent dentition

Not adjusted meta-regression beta was 0.43 per additional follow-up year.

4 findings from 1 review
  • Caries Progression Rates Revisited: A Systematic Review. 2019 All outcomes
    Per additional year of follow-up · Western or comparable populations · Not adjusted
    Meta-regression beta per year of follow-up 0.43 [0.04, 0.83]
    22 studies · 11300 participants
    GRADE not reported
  • Caries Progression Rates Revisited: A Systematic Review. 2019 All outcomes
    Per additional year of follow-up · Western or comparable populations · Adjusted for bitewings and age at baseline
    Meta-regression beta per year of follow-up 0.64 [0.31, 0.96]
    22 studies · 11300 participants
    GRADE not reported
  • Caries Progression Rates Revisited: A Systematic Review. 2019 All outcomes
    Per additional year of follow-up · Western or comparable populations · Adjusted for bitewings age at baseline and baseline caries experience
    Meta-regression beta per year of follow-up 0.37 [0.04, 0.70]
    22 studies · 11300 participants
    GRADE not reported
Show 1 more finding
  • Caries Progression Rates Revisited: A Systematic Review. 2019 All outcomes
    Per additional year of follow-up · Western or comparable populations · Adjusted for groups 1-4 including relevance of evidence and risk of bias
    Meta-regression beta per year of follow-up 0.46 [0.08, 0.83]
    22 studies · 11300 participants
    GRADE not reported

Longer follow-up vs Shorter follow-up

Annual increment in DMFT (D3) · Children and adolescents with permanent dentition

Not adjusted meta-regression beta was 0.18 per additional follow-up year.

3 findings from 1 review
  • Caries Progression Rates Revisited: A Systematic Review. 2019 All outcomes
    Per additional year of follow-up · Western or comparable populations · Not adjusted
    Meta-regression beta per year of follow-up 0.18 [-0.04, 0.40]
    13 studies · 24753 participants
    GRADE not reported
  • Caries Progression Rates Revisited: A Systematic Review. 2019 All outcomes
    Per additional year of follow-up · Western or comparable populations · Adjusted for bitewings and age at baseline
    Meta-regression beta per year of follow-up 0.18 [0.02, 0.35]
    13 studies · 24753 participants
    GRADE not reported
  • Caries Progression Rates Revisited: A Systematic Review. 2019 All outcomes
    Per additional year of follow-up · Western or comparable populations · Adjusted for bitewings age at baseline and baseline caries experience
    Meta-regression beta per year of follow-up 0.23 [0.06, 0.40]
    13 studies · 24753 participants
    GRADE not reported

Longer follow-up vs Shorter follow-up

Caries incidence rate per person-year at risk (D3) · Children and adolescents with permanent dentition

Adjusted for groups 1-4 including relevance of evidence and risk of bias meta-regression beta was -0.02 per additional follow-up year.

5 findings from 1 review
  • Caries Progression Rates Revisited: A Systematic Review. 2019 All outcomes
    Per additional year of follow-up · Western or comparable populations · Adjusted for groups 1-4 including relevance of evidence and risk of bias
    Meta-regression beta per year of follow-up -0.02 [-0.05, 0.01]
    15 studies · 10768 participants
    GRADE not reported
  • Caries Progression Rates Revisited: A Systematic Review. 2019 All outcomes
    Per additional year of follow-up · Western or comparable populations · Adjusted for bitewings age at baseline and baseline caries experience
    Meta-regression beta per year of follow-up 0.00 [-0.00, 0.01]
    15 studies · 10768 participants
    GRADE not reported
  • Caries Progression Rates Revisited: A Systematic Review. 2019 All outcomes
    Per additional year of follow-up · Western or comparable populations · Adjusted for bitewings and age at baseline
    Meta-regression beta per year of follow-up 0.00 [-0.00, 0.01]
    15 studies · 10768 participants
    GRADE not reported
Show 2 more findings
  • Caries Progression Rates Revisited: A Systematic Review. 2019 All outcomes
    Per additional year of follow-up · Western or comparable populations · Adjusted for groups 1-3 including decade and preventive intervention
    Meta-regression beta per year of follow-up -0.00 [-0.02, 0.02]
    15 studies · 10768 participants
    GRADE not reported
  • Caries Progression Rates Revisited: A Systematic Review. 2019 All outcomes
    Per additional year of follow-up · Western or comparable populations · Not adjusted
    Meta-regression beta per year of follow-up -0.00 [-0.01, 0.01]
    15 studies · 10768 participants
    GRADE not reported

Lower unemployment rate vs Higher unemployment rate (low <=5% / medium >5-10% / high >10%)

Caries experience (mean DMFT) · 12-year-old children across European countries (national/regional epidemiological surveys, 2011-2022)

Mean DMFT tended to increase with unemployment rate (low 1.23, medium 2.08, high 2.38; ANOVA p<.05); descriptive country-level means only, not meta-analyzed or GRADE-rated.

3 findings from 1 review

Lower unemployment rate vs Higher unemployment rate (low <=5% / medium >5-10% / high >10%)

Odds of higher caries (DMFT) category · 12-year-old children across European countries (national/regional epidemiological surveys, 2011-2022)

Unemployment rate was not independently associated with DMFT category in the adjusted model (OR 0.99, 95% CI 0.44 to 2.23); not GRADE-rated.

1 finding from 1 review

Laminar air flow with HEPA filter vs Without laminar flow or filter

Reduction in level of contamination in aerosols (CFU per cubic feet/min/patient) using Reyniers slit sampler 30 inches (76 cm) from floor · People undergoing aerosol-generating procedures (AGPs) in a dental setting

It is very uncertain whether laminar air flow with HEPA filter changes reduction in level of contamination in aerosols (CFU per cubic… compared with without laminar flow or filter (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Laminar air flow with HEPA filter vs Without laminar flow or filter

Reduction in level of contamination in aerosols (CFU per cubic feet/min/patient) using Andersen cascade sampler 20-30 cm from mouth · People undergoing aerosol-generating procedures (AGPs) in a dental setting

It is very uncertain whether laminar air flow with HEPA filter changes reduction in level of contamination in aerosols (CFU per cubic… compared with without laminar flow or filter (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Taxane followed by anthracyclines vs anthracyclines followed by taxane

Overall survival ( · neoadjuvant therapy for early breast cancer

Taxane followed by anthracyclines showed no clear difference in overall survival ( compared with anthracyclines followed by taxane (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Taxane followed by anthracyclines vs anthracyclines followed by taxane

Grade 3 to 4 neutropenia · adjuvant therapy for early breast cancer

Taxane followed by anthracyclines leads to lower adverse events: neutropenia (grade 3/4) ( compared with anthracyclines followed by taxane (high certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Taxane followed by anthracyclines vs anthracyclines followed by taxane

Adverse events: neurotoxicity (grade 3/4) ( · adjuvant therapy for early breast cancer

Taxane followed by anthracyclines showed no clear difference in adverse events: neurotoxicity (grade 3/4) ( compared with anthracyclines followed by taxane (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Taxane followed by anthracyclines vs anthracyclines followed by taxane

Treatment adherence (defined as dose delay) ( · adjuvant therapy for early breast cancer

Taxane followed by anthracyclines showed no clear difference in treatment adherence (defined as dose delay) ( compared with anthracyclines followed by taxane (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Taxane followed by anthracyclines vs anthracyclines followed by taxane

Disease-free survival · neoadjuvant therapy for early breast cancer

Taxane followed by anthracyclines showed no clear difference in disease‐free survival ( compared with anthracyclines followed by taxane (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Taxane followed by anthracyclines vs anthracyclines followed by taxane

Pathological complete response · neoadjuvant therapy for early breast cancer

Taxane followed by anthracyclines showed no clear difference in pathological complete response (no invasive cancer in breast or… compared with anthracyclines followed by taxane (high certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Taxane followed by anthracyclines vs anthracyclines followed by taxane

Grade 3 to 4 neutropenia · neoadjuvant therapy for early breast cancer

Taxane followed by anthracyclines showed no clear difference in adverse events: neutropenia (grade 3/4) ( compared with anthracyclines followed by taxane (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review