Longer follow-up vs Shorter follow-up: Annual increment in DMFT (D3)
Not adjusted meta-regression beta was 0.18 per additional follow-up year.
What each review found
Include earlier review versions| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Longer follow-up vs Shorter follow-up Annual increment in DMFT (D3) · Children and adolescents with permanent dentition · Per additional year of follow-up, Western or comparable populations, Not adjusted Not adjusted meta-regression beta was 0.18 per additional follow-up year. Caries Progression Rates Revisited: A Systematic Review. (2019) All outcomes | Meta-regression beta per year of follow-up 0.18 [-0.04, 0.40] | 13 studies · 24753 participants | GRADE not reported |
Longer follow-up vs Shorter follow-up Annual increment in DMFT (D3) · Children and adolescents with permanent dentition · Per additional year of follow-up, Western or comparable populations, Adjusted for bitewings and age at baseline Adjusted for bitewings and age at baseline meta-regression beta was 0.18 per additional follow-up year. Caries Progression Rates Revisited: A Systematic Review. (2019) All outcomes | Meta-regression beta per year of follow-up 0.18 [0.02, 0.35] | 13 studies · 24753 participants | GRADE not reported |
Longer follow-up vs Shorter follow-up Annual increment in DMFT (D3) · Children and adolescents with permanent dentition · Per additional year of follow-up, Western or comparable populations, Adjusted for bitewings age at baseline and baseline caries experience Adjusted for bitewings age at baseline and baseline caries experience meta-regression beta was 0.23 per additional follow-up year. Caries Progression Rates Revisited: A Systematic Review. (2019) All outcomes | Meta-regression beta per year of follow-up 0.23 [0.06, 0.40] | 13 studies · 24753 participants | GRADE not reported |
Longer follow-up vs Shorter follow-up Annual increment in DMFT (D3) · Children and adolescents with permanent dentition · Per additional year of follow-up, Western or comparable populations, Adjusted for groups 1-4 including relevance of evidence and risk of bias Adjusted for groups 1-4 including relevance of evidence and risk of bias meta-regression beta was -0.04 per additional follow-up year. Caries Progression Rates Revisited: A Systematic Review. (2019) All outcomes | Meta-regression beta per year of follow-up -0.04 [-0.34, 0.26] | 13 studies · 24753 participants | GRADE not reported |
Longer follow-up vs Shorter follow-up Annual increment in DMFT (D3) · Children and adolescents with permanent dentition · Per additional year of follow-up, Western or comparable populations, Adjusted for groups 1-3 including decade and preventive intervention Adjusted for groups 1-3 including decade and preventive intervention meta-regression beta was 0.07 per additional follow-up year. Caries Progression Rates Revisited: A Systematic Review. (2019) All outcomes | Meta-regression beta per year of follow-up 0.07 [-0.24, 0.39] | 13 studies · 24753 participants | GRADE not reported |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Caries Progression Rates Revisited: A Systematic Review. 2019 All outcomes | 16 April 2018 | 43 | Not applicable |
Studies behind the findings
None of these reviews ties its included studies to this outcome in the data here. Cochrane reviews and reviews with headline outcomes only do not list their studies yet.
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.