Function (all scores/instruments): intermediate term IKDC 2000 (version) score. Scale from: 0 to 100; higher scores = better function. · Adults with isolated cartilage defects (defect areas 1.0 cm2 to 6.0 cm2) of the knee
It is very uncertain whether mosaicplasty changes function (all scores/instruments): intermediate term IKDC 2000… compared with microfracture (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Function (all scores/instruments): long term Scale from: 0 to 100; higher scores = better function. · Adults with isolated cartilage defects (defect areas 1.0 cm2 to 6.0 cm2) of the knee
It is very uncertain whether mosaicplasty changes function (all scores/instruments): long term Scale from: 0 to 100;… compared with microfracture (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
QoL · Adults with isolated cartilage defects (defect areas 1.0 cm2 to 6.0 cm2) of the knee
It is very uncertain whether mosaicplasty changes quality of life: long‐term KOOS QOL score. Scale 0 to 100; higher… compared with microfracture (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Failure of treatment and adverse effects: long‐term Participants with surgery and symptom recurrence · Adults with isolated cartilage defects (defect areas 1.0 cm2 to 6.0 cm2) of the knee
It is very uncertain whether mosaicplasty changes failure of treatment and adverse effects: long‐term Participants… compared with microfracture (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Pain North Americal Spine Society pain scores. Scale from: 0 to 100 (higher scores indicate less pain). · Adults with isolated cartilage defects (defect areas 1.0 cm2 to 6.0 cm2) of the knee
It is very uncertain whether mosaicplasty changes pain: long‐term KOOS Pain score. Scale 0 to 100; higher scores =… compared with microfracture (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Activity · Adults with isolated cartilage defects (defect areas 1.0 cm2 to 6.0 cm2) of the knee
It is very uncertain whether mosaicplasty changes activity: intermediate term (1 to 5 years compared with microfracture (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Activity: long term (5 or more years · Adults with isolated cartilage defects (defect areas 1.0 cm2 to 6.0 cm2) of the knee
It is very uncertain whether mosaicplasty changes activity: long term (5 or more years compared with microfracture (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Modified Activities Scale for Kids‐performance (ASKp) score (0 to 100%: best outcome) at 4 weeks · children with acute 'low risk' (undisplaced) ankle fractures
1 finding from 1 review
Unacceptable anatomy: leg‐length discrepancy, limp, abnormal gait · children with acute 'low risk' (undisplaced) ankle fractures
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Number of children experiencing adverse outcomes at 4 weeks · children with acute 'low risk' (undisplaced) ankle fractures
It is very uncertain whether ankle brace changes number of children experiencing adverse outcomes at 4 weeks compared with rigid cast (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Return to activity · children with acute 'low risk' (undisplaced) ankle fractures
2 findings from 1 review
Patient satisfaction: would have preferred the other device · children with acute 'low risk' (undisplaced) ankle fractures
Ankle brace may leads to lower patient satisfaction: would have preferred the other device compared with rigid cast (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Faces Pain Scale score at 4 weeks' post ‐injury (0 to 10: greatest pain) · children with acute 'low risk' (undisplaced) ankle fractures
1 finding from 1 review
Intervention not reported
Subjective knee score ‐ KOOS‐4 score (mean score of 4 components) at 2 years: score from 0 (extreme symptoms) to 100 (no symptoms) · Adults with acute anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries (young, active individuals)
1 finding from 1 review
Intervention not reported
Serious adverse events (such as donor site morbidity, failure of graft including re‐rupture) at 2 years · Adults with acute anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries (young, active individuals)
1 finding from 1 review
Intervention not reported
Treatment failure (graft rupture or ACL reconstruction) at 2 years5 · Adults with acute anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries (young, active individuals)
The intervention may leads to lower treatment failure (graft rupture or ACL reconstruction) at 2 years5 (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Intervention not reported
Treatment failure (meniscal surgery) at 5 years5,7 · Adults with acute anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries (young, active individuals)
The intervention showed no clear difference in treatment failure (meniscal surgery) at 5 years5,7 (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Intervention not reported
General health‐related quality of life: SF‐36 physical component score (range 0 to 100; higher score = better health state) at 2 years · Adults with acute anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries (young, active individuals)
1 finding from 1 review
Intervention not reported
Return to activity or level of sport at 2 years · Adults with acute anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries (young, active individuals)
The intervention showed no clear difference in return to activity or level of sport at 2 years (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Intervention not reported
Osteoarthritis at 5 years · Adults with acute anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries (young, active individuals)
It is very uncertain whether the intervention changes osteoarthritis at 5 years (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review