Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

4,771 questions · 10,185 findings · 893 reviews

Sort:Best matchNewest Highest certainty Download CSV

No studies found 2,109 · 20.7%GRADE not reported 1,125 · 11%Very low 2,279 · 22.4%Low 2,514 · 24.7%Moderate 1,709 · 16.8%High 449 · 4.4%

Ranked among the 5,000 newest matching findings; add words or filters to narrow the search.

NPWT combined with internet‐plus home care vs usual care

Outcomes Â · adults with pressure ulcers

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Negative pressure wound therapy for treating pressure ulcers 2023 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

NPWT combined with internet‐plus home care vs usual care

The proportion of pressure ulcers healed · adults with pressure ulcers

1 finding from 1 review

Negative pressure wound therapy for treating pressure ulcers 2023 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 60 participants
GRADE not reported

NPWT combined with internet‐plus home care vs usual care

Time to complete healing · adults with pressure ulcers

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Negative pressure wound therapy for treating pressure ulcers 2023 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

NPWT combined with internet‐plus home care vs usual care

Adverse events Â · adults with pressure ulcers

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Negative pressure wound therapy for treating pressure ulcers 2023 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

NPWT vs moist wound healing

The proportion of pressure ulcers healed · adults with pressure ulcers

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Negative pressure wound therapy for treating pressure ulcers 2023 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

NPWT vs moist wound healing

Time to complete healing · adults with pressure ulcers

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Negative pressure wound therapy for treating pressure ulcers 2023 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

NPWT vs moist wound healing

Adverse events Â · adults with pressure ulcers

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Negative pressure wound therapy for treating pressure ulcers 2023 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

NPWT vs the Healthpoint system

Outcomes Â · adults with pressure ulcers

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Negative pressure wound therapy for treating pressure ulcers 2023 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

NPWT vs the Healthpoint system

The proportion of pressure ulcers healed · adults with pressure ulcers

1 finding from 1 review

Negative pressure wound therapy for treating pressure ulcers 2023 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 28 participants
GRADE not reported

NPWT vs the Healthpoint system

Time to complete healing · adults with pressure ulcers

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Negative pressure wound therapy for treating pressure ulcers 2023 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Deferasirox vs deferiprone (DFO)

Sustained adherence

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Interventions for improving adherence to iron chelation therapy in people with sickle cell disease or thalassaemia 2023 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Deferasirox vs deferiprone (DFO)

QoL

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Interventions for improving adherence to iron chelation therapy in people with sickle cell disease or thalassaemia 2023 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Summary of findings: Comparison 3 ‐ deferiprone (DFP) vs deferasirox (DFX)

Adherence to iron chelation therapy (%, SD)

1 finding from 1 review

Interventions for improving adherence to iron chelation therapy in people with sickle cell disease or thalassaemia 2023 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 390 participants
Low

Summary of findings: Comparison 3 ‐ deferiprone (DFP) vs deferasirox (DFX)

SAE (chelation‐related) (n/N)

1 finding from 1 review

Interventions for improving adherence to iron chelation therapy in people with sickle cell disease or thalassaemia 2023 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
1.54 [0.44, 5.39]
1 study · 390 participants
Very low

Summary of findings: Comparison 3 ‐ deferiprone (DFP) vs deferasirox (DFX)

SAEs

It is very uncertain whether summary of findings: Comparison 3 ‐ deferiprone (DFP) changes total SAEs compared with deferasirox (DFX) (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Interventions for improving adherence to iron chelation therapy in people with sickle cell disease or thalassaemia 2023 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 0.95 [0.46, 1.96]
1 study · 390 participants
Very low

Summary of findings: Comparison 3 ‐ deferiprone (DFP) vs deferasirox (DFX)

All‐cause mortality (n/N)

Summary of findings: Comparison 3 ‐ deferiprone (DFP) showed no clear difference in all‐cause mortality (n/N) compared with deferasirox (DFX) (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Interventions for improving adherence to iron chelation therapy in people with sickle cell disease or thalassaemia 2023 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RD 0
1 study · 390 participants
Low

Summary of findings: Comparison 3 ‐ deferiprone (DFP) vs deferasirox (DFX)

Sustained adherence

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Interventions for improving adherence to iron chelation therapy in people with sickle cell disease or thalassaemia 2023 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Summary of findings: Comparison 3 ‐ deferiprone (DFP) vs deferasirox (DFX)

QoL

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Interventions for improving adherence to iron chelation therapy in people with sickle cell disease or thalassaemia 2023 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

DFX film‐coated tablet vs DFX dispersible tablet

SAEs

It is very uncertain whether summary of findings: Comparison 4 ‐ deferasirox (DFX) film‐coated… changes incidence of SAEs compared with DFX dispersible tablets (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Interventions for improving adherence to iron chelation therapy in people with sickle cell disease or thalassaemia 2023 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 1.22 [0.62, 2.37]
1 study · 173 participants
Very low

DFX film‐coated tablet vs DFX dispersible tablet

All‐cause mortality

1 finding from 1 review

Interventions for improving adherence to iron chelation therapy in people with sickle cell disease or thalassaemia 2023 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
7.3 [0.14, 368.15]
1 study · 173 participants
Very low