Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

Refine by population, intervention, comparison or outcome
More filters
Evidence found and GRADE certainty

4,721 questions · 19,640 findings · 2,039 reviews · Headline outcomes only

No studies found 3,754 · 19.1%GRADE not reported 1,273 · 6.5%Very low 4,859 · 24.7%Low 5,568 · 28.4%Moderate 3,240 · 16.5%High 946 · 4.8%

Ranked among the 5,000 newest matching findings; add words or filters to narrow the search.

Facilitated tucking / four‐handed care / gentle human touch vs usual care

Pain (PIPP) · neonates with mechanical ventilation

Facilitated tucking / four‐handed care / gentle human touch showed no clear difference in PIPP during endotracheal suctioning Range of scale 0 to 21. Lower… compared with standard care (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Facilitated tucking / four‐handed care / gentle human touch vs usual care

Heart rate · neonates with mechanical ventilation

Facilitated tucking / four‐handed care / gentle human touch showed no clear difference in heart rate compared with standard care (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Facilitated tucking / four‐handed care / gentle human touch vs usual care

SaO 2 during endotracheal suctioning · neonates with mechanical ventilation

Facilitated tucking / four‐handed care / gentle human touch showed no clear difference in saO 2 during endotracheal suctioning compared with standard care (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Facilitated tucking / four‐handed care / gentle human touch vs usual care

SDB during endotracheal suctioning · neonates with mechanical ventilation

Facilitated tucking / four‐handed care / gentle human touch showed no clear difference in SDB during endotracheal suctioning compared with standard care (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Facilitated tucking / four‐handed care / gentle human touch vs usual care

SRB during endotracheal suctioning · neonates with mechanical ventilation

Facilitated tucking / four‐handed care / gentle human touch may leads to higher SRB during endotracheal suctioning compared with standard care (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Mindfulness‐based interventions (MBIs) vs non‐active comparators

Clinical CVD events (CVD mortality and non‐fatal MI) · people at high risk of or withcardiovascular disease

It is very uncertain whether mindfulness‐based interventions (MBIs) changes clinical CVD events (CVD mortality and non‐fatal MI) compared with non‐active comparators (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Transcendental meditation (TM) vs active comparators

Clinical CVD events (CVD mortality, non‐fatal MI and stroke, revascularisations) · people at high risk of or withcardiovascular disease

Transcendental meditation (TM) showed no clear difference in clinical CVD events (CVD mortality, non‐fatal MI and stroke,… compared with active comparators (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review