Question · asked by 1 review

Mindfulness‐based interventions (MBIs) vs non‐active comparators: Adverse events

Population
people at high risk of or withcardiovascular disease
Intervention
Mindfulness‐based interventions (MBIs)
Comparison
non‐active comparators
Outcome
Adverse events

Mindfulness‐based interventions (MBIs) showed no clear difference in adverse events compared with non‐active comparators (low certainty).

What each review found

Include earlier review versions
FindingEffectStudiesGRADE certainty
Mindfulness‐based interventions (MBIs) vs non‐active comparators
Adverse events · people at high risk of or withcardiovascular disease
Mindfulness‐based interventions (MBIs) showed no clear difference in adverse events compared with non‐active comparators (low certainty).
Meditation for the primary and secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease (2024) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 5 [0.27, 91.52]1 study · 18 participantsLow

Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.

The reviews

ReviewSearched up toIncluded studiesAMSTAR 2
Meditation for the primary and secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease
2024 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
Not reportedNot extractedNot assessed

The same intervention and outcome, asked in another population or against another comparator.

How reviews are matched to this question

Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.