SaO 2 · neonates with mechanical ventilation
White noise showed no clear difference in saO 2 compared with standard care (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Behavioural indicators · neonates with mechanical ventilation
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
— · neonates with mechanical ventilation
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Physiological indicators · neonates with mechanical ventilation
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Heart rate · neonates with mechanical ventilation
Facilitated tucking / four‐handed care / gentle human touch showed no clear difference in heart rate compared with standard care (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
SaO 2 during endotracheal suctioning · neonates with mechanical ventilation
Facilitated tucking / four‐handed care / gentle human touch showed no clear difference in saO 2 during endotracheal suctioning compared with standard care (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Behavioural indicators · neonates with mechanical ventilation
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
SDB during endotracheal suctioning · neonates with mechanical ventilation
Facilitated tucking / four‐handed care / gentle human touch showed no clear difference in SDB during endotracheal suctioning compared with standard care (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
SRB during endotracheal suctioning · neonates with mechanical ventilation
Facilitated tucking / four‐handed care / gentle human touch may leads to higher SRB during endotracheal suctioning compared with standard care (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
— · neonates with mechanical ventilation
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Cardiovascular events · people at high risk of or withcardiovascular disease
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Clinical CVD events (CVD mortality and non‐fatal MI) · people at high risk of or withcardiovascular disease
It is very uncertain whether mindfulness‐based interventions (MBIs) changes clinical CVD events (CVD mortality and non‐fatal MI) compared with non‐active comparators (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Anxiety · people at high risk of or withcardiovascular disease
1 finding from 1 review
Perceived stress, change from baseline · people at high risk of or withcardiovascular disease
1 finding from 1 review
General well‐being · people at high risk of or withcardiovascular disease
1 finding from 1 review
Adverse events · people at high risk of or withcardiovascular disease
Mindfulness‐based interventions (MBIs) showed no clear difference in adverse events compared with non‐active comparators (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Smoking cessation · people at high risk of or withcardiovascular disease
Mindfulness‐based interventions (MBIs) showed no clear difference in smoking cessation compared with non‐active comparators (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Clinical CVD events (CVD mortality, non‐fatal MI and stroke, revascularisations) · people at high risk of or withcardiovascular disease
Transcendental meditation (TM) showed no clear difference in clinical CVD events (CVD mortality, non‐fatal MI and stroke,… compared with active comparators (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Anxiety · people at high risk of or withcardiovascular disease
1 finding from 1 review
Perceived stress, change from baseline · people at high risk of or withcardiovascular disease
1 finding from 1 review