Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

327 questions · 337 findings · 47 reviews · Headline outcomes only

Sort:Best matchNewest Highest certainty Download CSV

No studies found 69 · 20.5%GRADE not reported 35 · 10.4%Very low 49 · 14.5%Low 73 · 21.7%Moderate 63 · 18.7%High 48 · 14.2%

Intervention not reported

Identification of IPV by type of healthcare setting ‐ Antenatal clinics · women attending healthcare settings for any health‐related reason

1 finding from 1 review

Screening women for intimate partner violence in healthcare settings 2015 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
2 studies · 663 participants
Moderate

Intervention not reported

Identification of IPV by type of healthcare setting ‐ Maternal health services · women attending healthcare settings for any health‐related reason

1 finding from 1 review

Screening women for intimate partner violence in healthcare settings 2015 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 829 participants
Moderate

Intervention not reported

Identification of IPV by type of healthcare setting ‐ Emergency departments · women attending healthcare settings for any health‐related reason

1 finding from 1 review

Screening women for intimate partner violence in healthcare settings 2015 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
3 studies · 2608 participants
Moderate

Intervention not reported

Identification of IPV by type of healthcare setting ‐ Hospital‐based primary care · women attending healthcare settings for any health‐related reason

1 finding from 1 review

Screening women for intimate partner violence in healthcare settings 2015 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 293 participants
Moderate

Intervention not reported

Referrals (assessed immediately) · women attending healthcare settings for any health‐related reason

1 finding from 1 review

Screening women for intimate partner violence in healthcare settings 2015 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
2 studies · 1298 participants
Low

Intervention not reported

Identification of IPV (non‐clinically based, assessed immediately) · women attending healthcare settings for any health‐related reason

1 finding from 1 review

Screening women for intimate partner violence in healthcare settings 2015 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
4 studies · 2765 participants
Moderate

Intervention not reported

Outcomes1 · adult male patients

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Screening for prostate cancer 2013 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Intervention not reported

All‐cause mortality · adult male patients

The intervention showed no clear difference in all‐cause mortality (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Screening for prostate cancer 2013 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 1 [0.96, 1.03]
4 studies · 294856 participants
Moderate

Intervention not reported

Prostate cancer‐specific mortality · adult male patients

The intervention showed no clear difference in prostate cancer‐specific mortality (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Screening for prostate cancer 2013 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 1 [0.86, 1.17]
5 studies · 341342 participants
Moderate

Intervention not reported

Prostate cancer diagnosis · adult male patients

The intervention may leads to higher prostate cancer diagnosis (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Screening for prostate cancer 2013 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 1.3 [1.02, 1.65]
4 studies · 294856 participants
Low

Intervention not reported

Tumour stage (localised T1‐T2, N0, M0) · adult male patients

The intervention may leads to higher tumour stage (localised T1‐T2, N0, M0) (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Screening for prostate cancer 2013 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 1.79 [1.19, 2.7]
3 studies · 247954 participants
Low

Intervention not reported

Tumour stage (advanced T3‐4, N1, M1) · adult male patients

The intervention probably leads to lower tumour stage (advanced T3‐4, N1, M1) (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Screening for prostate cancer 2013 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 0.8 [0.73, 0.87]
3 studies · 247954 participants
Moderate

Intervention not reported

CRC Mortality ‐ Flexible sigmoidoscopy · Asymptomatic individuals

The intervention leads to lower CRC Mortality ‐ Flexible sigmoidoscopy (high certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Flexible sigmoidoscopy versus faecal occult blood testing for colorectal cancer screening in asymptomatic individuals 2013 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 0 [0.65, 0.79]
5 studies · 414744 participants
High

Intervention not reported

CRC Mortality ‐ Faecal occult blood testing · Asymptomatic individuals

The intervention leads to lower CRC Mortality ‐ Faecal occult blood testing (high certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Flexible sigmoidoscopy versus faecal occult blood testing for colorectal cancer screening in asymptomatic individuals 2013 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 0 [0.8, 0.92]
4 studies · 329642 participants
High

Intervention not reported

CRC incidence ‐ Flexible sigmoidoscopy · Asymptomatic individuals

The intervention probably leads to lower CRC incidence ‐ Flexible sigmoidoscopy (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Flexible sigmoidoscopy versus faecal occult blood testing for colorectal cancer screening in asymptomatic individuals 2013 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 0 [0.73, 0.9]
5 studies · 414744 participants
Moderate

Intervention not reported

CRC incidence ‐ Faecal occult blood testing · Asymptomatic individuals

The intervention leads to lower CRC incidence ‐ Faecal occult blood testing (high certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Flexible sigmoidoscopy versus faecal occult blood testing for colorectal cancer screening in asymptomatic individuals 2013 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 0
4 studies · 329536 participants
High

Intervention not reported

All‐cause Mortality ‐ Flexible sigmoidoscopy · Asymptomatic individuals

The intervention showed no clear difference in all‐cause Mortality ‐ Flexible sigmoidoscopy (high certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Flexible sigmoidoscopy versus faecal occult blood testing for colorectal cancer screening in asymptomatic individuals 2013 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 0 [0.95, 1.01]
4 studies · 364827 participants
High

Intervention not reported

All‐cause Mortality ‐ Faecal occult blood testing · Asymptomatic individuals

The intervention leads to higher all‐cause Mortality ‐ Faecal occult blood testing (high certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Flexible sigmoidoscopy versus faecal occult blood testing for colorectal cancer screening in asymptomatic individuals 2013 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 1
4 studies · 329642 participants
High

Intervention not reported

Oesophageal cancer‐specific mortality ‐ not measured · patients with oesophageal cancer

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Screening for oesophageal cancer 2012 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Intervention not reported

Secondary outcomes ‐ not measured · patients with oesophageal cancer

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Screening for oesophageal cancer 2012 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found