Gap finder

Search review questions

Each row is one question a systematic review asked: who, what, compared with what, and which outcome, with the effect it found and how certain that is. Words match anywhere in the field.

Limit to evidence status or GRADE (optional)

75,239 questions in 5,342 reviews

current versions
No studies 15,213 · 20.2%Ungraded 10,323 · 13.7%Very low 17,528 · 23.3%Low 17,951 · 23.9%Moderate 11,190 · 14.9%High 3,034 · 4%

Ungraded means an effect was reported without a GRADE rating; it is not a gap. No studies means the review found nothing to answer the question. The six categories are a display order, not a score.

QuestionEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Stabilisation splint (SS) vs Minimal/no treatment
Pain (severity/palpation; PSS, PPI, VAS) · Patients with pain dysfunction syndrome (PDS) of all degrees of severity · 3 months or less
Stabilisation splint therapy for temporomandibular pain dysfunction syndrome (2004) · Cochrane
MD -3.20 [-4.81, -1.59]4 studiesUngraded
Fluoride toothpaste vs Fluoride mouthrinse
Unacceptability of treatment (drop-outs) · Children or adolescents aged 16 or less at the start of the study
One topical fluoride (toothpastes, or mouthrinses, or gels, or varnishes) versus another for preventing… (2004) · Cochrane
RR 0.89 [0.78, 1.00]5 studiesUngraded
Fluoride toothpaste vs Fluoride mouthrinse
Proportion of children developing new caries (permanent) · Children or adolescents aged 16 or less at the start of the study
One topical fluoride (toothpastes, or mouthrinses, or gels, or varnishes) versus another for preventing… (2004) · Cochrane
RR 0.90 [0.60, 1.37]1 studyUngraded
Fluoride mouthrinse combined with fluoride toothpaste vs Fluoride mouthrinse alone
Caries increment in permanent teeth: D(M)FS (prevented fraction) · Children or adolescents aged 16 years or less · Nearest to 3 years
Combinations of topical fluoride (toothpastes, mouthrinses, gels, varnishes) versus single topical fluoride… (2004) · Cochrane
PF 0.05 [-0.05, 0.15]4 studies · 1678 participantsUngraded
Stabilisation splint (SS) vs Jaw exercises
TMJ clicking · Patients with pain dysfunction syndrome (PDS) of all degrees of severity · up to 6 months
Stabilisation splint therapy for temporomandibular pain dysfunction syndrome (2004) · Cochrane
SS vs jaw exercises (Magnusson 1999): TMJ clicking at 3 months and greater than 3 months; no statistically significant between-group difference. Forest-plot data presented, totals not pooled.1 studyUngraded
Stabilisation splint (SS) vs Visual feedback
Movement (lateral mandibular movement) · Patients with pain dysfunction syndrome (PDS) of all degrees of severity · 3 months or less
Stabilisation splint therapy for temporomandibular pain dysfunction syndrome (2004) · Cochrane
SS vs visual feedback (Monteiro 1988): both SS and visual feedback groups showed a significant decrease in lateral mandibular movement scores (P<0.01); data were unavailable for analysis.1 studyUngraded
Fluoride mouthrinse combined with fluoride toothpaste vs Fluoride mouthrinse alone
Unacceptability of treatment (drop-outs / leaving study early) · Children or adolescents aged 16 years or less
Combinations of topical fluoride (toothpastes, mouthrinses, gels, varnishes) versus single topical fluoride… (2004) · Cochrane
RR 0.88 [0.67, 1.17]3 studies · 1697 participantsUngraded
Fluoride gel combined with fluoride mouthrinse vs Fluoride gel alone
Unacceptability of treatment (drop-outs / leaving study early) · Children or adolescents aged 16 years or less
Combinations of topical fluoride (toothpastes, mouthrinses, gels, varnishes) versus single topical fluoride… (2004) · Cochrane
RR 1.00 [0.72, 1.40]1 study · 344 participantsUngraded
Fluoride mouthrinse, gel or varnish combined with fluoride toothpaste (any combined regimen) vs Fluoride toothpaste alone
Adverse effects (tooth staining and other side effects) · Children or adolescents aged 16 years or less
Combinations of topical fluoride (toothpastes, mouthrinses, gels, varnishes) versus single topical fluoride… (2004) · Cochrane
Adverse-effect data scarcely reported: a stain score in one trial and 'any side effects' in one trial without complete or useable data (stated 'no side effects observed in both groups'). No useful information on tooth…NRUngraded
Direct resin composite veneer vs Indirect resin composite veneer
Adverse reactions · Patients with permanent anterior teeth with intrinsic staining suitable for laminate veneer restorations
Direct versus indirect veneer restorations for intrinsic dental stains (2004) · Cochrane
Planned outcome; no adverse-reaction data were reported by the included trial.0 studiesNo studies
Stabilisation splint (SS) vs Bite plates
Helkimo dysfunction score · Patients with pain dysfunction syndrome (PDS) of all degrees of severity · 3 months or less
Stabilisation splint therapy for temporomandibular pain dysfunction syndrome (2004) · Cochrane
RR 0.68 [0.20, 2.23]1 studyUngraded
Fluoride varnish combined with fluoride toothpaste vs Fluoride varnish alone
Unacceptability of treatment (drop-outs / leaving study early) · Children or adolescents aged 16 years or less
Combinations of topical fluoride (toothpastes, mouthrinses, gels, varnishes) versus single topical fluoride… (2004) · Cochrane
RR 0.75 [0.22, 2.59]1 study · 196 participantsUngraded
Fluoride gel combined with fluoride mouthrinse vs Fluoride gel alone
Caries increment in permanent teeth: D(M)FS (prevented fraction) · Children or adolescents aged 16 years or less · Nearest to 3 years
Combinations of topical fluoride (toothpastes, mouthrinses, gels, varnishes) versus single topical fluoride… (2004) · Cochrane
PF 0.23 [0.04, 0.43]2 studies · 497 participantsUngraded
Fluoride varnish combined with fluoride toothpaste vs Fluoride toothpaste alone
Unacceptability of treatment (drop-outs / leaving study early) · Children or adolescents aged 16 years or less
Combinations of topical fluoride (toothpastes, mouthrinses, gels, varnishes) versus single topical fluoride… (2004) · Cochrane
RR 1.29 [0.61, 2.71]2 studies · 294 participantsUngraded
Stabilisation splint (SS) vs Acupuncture
Movement (deviation and range of mouth opening) · Patients with pain dysfunction syndrome (PDS) of all degrees of severity · 3 months or less
Stabilisation splint therapy for temporomandibular pain dysfunction syndrome (2004) · Cochrane
RR 0.55 [0.35, 0.84]1 studyUngraded
Fluoride mouthrinse, gel or varnish combined with fluoride toothpaste (any combined regimen) vs Fluoride toothpaste alone
Enamel fluorosis (adverse effect) · Children or adolescents aged 16 years or less
Combinations of topical fluoride (toothpastes, mouthrinses, gels, varnishes) versus single topical fluoride… (2004) · Cochrane
Fluorosis data have not been reported in any of the trials.0 studiesNo studies
Direct resin composite veneer vs Indirect resin composite veneer
Pain following treatment · Patients with permanent anterior teeth with intrinsic staining suitable for laminate veneer restorations
Direct versus indirect veneer restorations for intrinsic dental stains (2004) · Cochrane
Planned outcome; pain following treatment was not reported by the included trial (earlier trial publications reported treatment times, not pain).0 studiesNo studies
Ozone applied to the carious lesion (10 or 40 seconds), with a fluoride reductant and oral hygiene/preventive advice vs No ozone, with a fluoride reductant and oral hygiene/preventive advice (as in the intervention group)
Adverse events · People of any age with caries (including demineralisation in non-cavitated carious lesions); the caries may affect any… · To 6 months
Ozone therapy for the treatment of dental caries (2004) · Cochrane
Baysan 2003 stated that no adverse events were reported to 6 months; no information was provided by Abu-Naba'a 2003 or Abu-Naba'a 2003pilot.1 studyUngraded
Direct resin composite veneer vs Indirect resin composite veneer
Restoration failure (longevity) · Patients with permanent anterior teeth with intrinsic staining suitable for laminate veneer restorations · 2 years
Direct versus indirect veneer restorations for intrinsic dental stains (2004) · Cochrane
Meijering 1998 (data by restoration, not pooled; no statistical analysis possible). Failures over 2-year follow-up: direct resin composite (n=69) 4 absolute and 14 relative failures; indirect resin composite (n=54) 7…1 study · 123 participantsUngraded
Fluoride toothpaste vs Fluoride gel
Caries increment (D(M)FS), permanent teeth · Children or adolescents aged 16 or less at the start of the study · 1 to 3 years (final follow-up)
One topical fluoride (toothpastes, or mouthrinses, or gels, or varnishes) versus another for preventing… (2004) · Cochrane
PF 0.00 [-0.21, 0.21]3 studies · 1256 participantsUngraded
Indirect veneer with no incisal edge reduction vs Indirect veneer with incisal edge reduction (1.5 mm plus short palatal bevel)
Restoration survival (longevity) · Patients receiving indirect laminate veneer restorations on permanent anterior teeth · 2 years
Direct versus indirect veneer restorations for intrinsic dental stains (2004) · Cochrane
Meijering 1998 (Table 3): survival percentages by preparation type at 2 years (original/functional/overall) - no incisal edge reduction 98/97/95; incisal reduction 95/90/87. No statistical comparison performed.1 studyUngraded
Stabilisation splint (SS) vs Minimal/no treatment
Depression (CES-D, POMS) · Patients with pain dysfunction syndrome (PDS) of all degrees of severity · 3 months or less
Stabilisation splint therapy for temporomandibular pain dysfunction syndrome (2004) · Cochrane
MD -3.90 [-6.29, -1.52]1 studyUngraded
Stabilisation splint (SS) vs Acupuncture
Helkimo clinical dysfunction score · Patients with pain dysfunction syndrome (PDS) of all degrees of severity · 3 months or less
Stabilisation splint therapy for temporomandibular pain dysfunction syndrome (2004) · Cochrane
SS vs acupuncture (Johansson 1991): Helkimo clinical dysfunction score decreased significantly in both groups (P<0.01) with no significant between-group difference; data not available for a pooled estimate.1 studyUngraded
Direct resin composite veneer vs Indirect resin composite veneer
Cost of treatment · Patients with permanent anterior teeth with intrinsic staining suitable for laminate veneer restorations
Direct versus indirect veneer restorations for intrinsic dental stains (2004) · Cochrane
Planned outcome; cost of treatment was not reported by the included trial.0 studiesNo studies
Ozone applied to the carious lesion (10 or 40 seconds), with a fluoride reductant and oral hygiene/preventive advice vs No ozone, with a fluoride reductant and oral hygiene/preventive advice (as in the intervention group)
Patient satisfaction · People of any age with caries (including demineralisation in non-cavitated carious lesions); the caries may affect any…
Ozone therapy for the treatment of dental caries (2004) · Cochrane
Abu-Naba'a 2003 reported participants' state of anxiety, comparing ozone treatment with traditional dental interventions (injection, drilling, filling); because no participant was randomised between ozone and drilling…1 studyUngraded
Fluoride varnish vs Fluoride toothpaste
Unacceptability of treatment (drop-outs) · Children or adolescents aged 16 or less at the start of the study
One topical fluoride (toothpastes, or mouthrinses, or gels, or varnishes) versus another for preventing… (2004) · Cochrane
RR 1.28 [0.37, 4.41]1 studyUngraded
Stabilisation splint (SS) vs Acupuncture
TMJ clicking · Patients with pain dysfunction syndrome (PDS) of all degrees of severity · 3 months or less
Stabilisation splint therapy for temporomandibular pain dysfunction syndrome (2004) · Cochrane
RR 1.00 [0.56, 1.78]1 studyUngraded
Direct resin composite veneer vs Indirect resin composite veneer
Patient satisfaction · Patients with permanent anterior teeth with intrinsic staining suitable for laminate veneer restorations · 2 years
Direct versus indirect veneer restorations for intrinsic dental stains (2004) · Cochrane
Meijering 1998 (Table 4): patients satisfied at 2 years - direct resin composite 67%, indirect resin composite 82%. No statistical comparison performed.1 studyUngraded
Direct resin composite veneer vs Porcelain (indirect) veneer
Patient satisfaction · Patients with permanent anterior teeth with intrinsic staining suitable for laminate veneer restorations · 2 years
Direct versus indirect veneer restorations for intrinsic dental stains (2004) · Cochrane
Meijering 1998 (Table 4): patients satisfied at 2 years - direct resin composite 67%, porcelain 93%. No statistical comparison performed.1 studyUngraded
Fluoride varnish combined with fluoride toothpaste vs Fluoride varnish alone
Caries increment in deciduous teeth: d(e)fs (prevented fraction) · Children or adolescents aged 16 years or less · Nearest to 3 years
Combinations of topical fluoride (toothpastes, mouthrinses, gels, varnishes) versus single topical fluoride… (2004) · Cochrane
PF 0.191 study · 186 participantsUngraded
Fluoride mouthrinse combined with fluoride gel vs Fluoride mouthrinse alone
Caries increment in permanent teeth: D(M)FS (prevented fraction) · Children or adolescents aged 16 years or less · Nearest to 3 years
Combinations of topical fluoride (toothpastes, mouthrinses, gels, varnishes) versus single topical fluoride… (2004) · Cochrane
PF 0.02 [-0.20, 0.24]1 study · 252 participantsUngraded
Fluoride varnish combined with fluoride toothpaste vs Fluoride toothpaste alone
Caries increment in permanent teeth: D(M)FS (prevented fraction) · Children or adolescents aged 16 years or less · Nearest to 3 years
Combinations of topical fluoride (toothpastes, mouthrinses, gels, varnishes) versus single topical fluoride… (2004) · Cochrane
PF 0.48 [0.12, 0.84]1 study · 71 participantsUngraded
Fluoride varnish vs Fluoride toothpaste
Proportion of children developing new caries (deciduous) · Children or adolescents aged 16 or less at the start of the study
One topical fluoride (toothpastes, or mouthrinses, or gels, or varnishes) versus another for preventing… (2004) · Cochrane
Petersson 1985 reported the proportion of children developing one or more new carious deciduous surfaces; exactly the same proportions were reported in both groups (no evidence of a difference).1 studyUngraded
Fluoride toothpaste vs Fluoride mouthrinse
Caries increment (D(M)FS), permanent teeth · Children or adolescents aged 16 or less at the start of the study · 1 to 3 years (final follow-up)
One topical fluoride (toothpastes, or mouthrinses, or gels, or varnishes) versus another for preventing… (2004) · Cochrane
PF 0.00 [-0.18, 0.19]6 studies · 2545 participantsUngraded
Direct resin composite veneer vs Porcelain (indirect) veneer
Restoration failure (longevity) · Patients with permanent anterior teeth with intrinsic staining suitable for laminate veneer restorations · 2 years
Direct versus indirect veneer restorations for intrinsic dental stains (2004) · Cochrane
Meijering 1998 (data by restoration, not pooled; no statistical analysis possible). Failures over 2-year follow-up: direct resin composite (n=69) 4 absolute and 14 relative failures; porcelain (n=56) 0 absolute and 3…1 study · 125 participantsUngraded
Fluoride gel vs Fluoride mouthrinse
Caries increment (D(M)FS), permanent teeth · Children or adolescents aged 16 or less at the start of the study · 1 to 3 years (final follow-up)
One topical fluoride (toothpastes, or mouthrinses, or gels, or varnishes) versus another for preventing… (2004) · Cochrane
PF -0.14 [-0.40, 0.12]1 study · 257 participantsUngraded
Fluoride varnish vs Fluoride gel
Caries increment (D(M)FS), permanent teeth · Children or adolescents aged 16 or less at the start of the study · 1 to 3 years (final follow-up)
One topical fluoride (toothpastes, or mouthrinses, or gels, or varnishes) versus another for preventing… (2004) · Cochrane
PF 0.14 [-0.12, 0.40]1 study · 254 participantsUngraded
Fluoride gel combined with fluoride toothpaste vs Fluoride gel alone
Caries increment in permanent teeth: D(M)FS (prevented fraction) · Children or adolescents aged 16 years or less · Nearest to 3 years
Combinations of topical fluoride (toothpastes, mouthrinses, gels, varnishes) versus single topical fluoride… (2004) · Cochrane
PF 0.10 [-0.01, 0.21]3 studies · 759 participantsUngraded
Fluoride mouthrinse, gel or varnish combined with fluoride toothpaste (any combined regimen) vs Fluoride toothpaste alone
Unacceptability of treatment (drop-outs / leaving study early) · Children or adolescents aged 16 years or less
Combinations of topical fluoride (toothpastes, mouthrinses, gels, varnishes) versus single topical fluoride… (2004) · Cochrane
RR 1.06 [0.93, 1.22]5 studies · 1998 participantsUngraded
Ozone applied to the carious lesion (10 or 40 seconds), with a fluoride reductant and oral hygiene/preventive advice vs No ozone, with a fluoride reductant and oral hygiene/preventive advice (as in the intervention group)
Further conventional dental treatment (filling and drilling) (binary yes/no) · People of any age with caries (including demineralisation in non-cavitated carious lesions); the caries may affect any…
Ozone therapy for the treatment of dental caries (2004) · Cochrane
Data were not provided by any study on the number of lesions requiring restorations to 6 months or later; no data on any further conventional treatment or other dental interventions.NRNo studies
Ozone applied to the carious lesion (10 or 40 seconds), with a fluoride reductant and oral hygiene/preventive advice vs No ozone, with a fluoride reductant and oral hygiene/preventive advice (as in the intervention group)
Cost · People of any age with caries (including demineralisation in non-cavitated carious lesions); the caries may affect any…
Ozone therapy for the treatment of dental caries (2004) · Cochrane
No data were provided in any of the included trials on costs.NRNo studies
Intra‐abdominal drainage vs no drainage
Anastomotic dehiscence · unselected population undergoing elective colorectal anastomosis
Intra‐abdominal drains for the prophylaxis of anastomotic leak in elective colorectal surgery (2004) · Cochrane
RR 1.4 [0.45, 4.4]2 studies · 809 participantsLow
Intra‐abdominal drainage vs no drainage
Mortality · unselected population undergoing elective colorectal anastomosis
Intra‐abdominal drains for the prophylaxis of anastomotic leak in elective colorectal surgery (2004) · Cochrane
RR 0.77 [0.41, 1.45]3 studies · 908 participantsLow
Strengthening exercise vs no exercise
Change in time taken for 6m comfortable walk (seconds) · patients with people with peripheral neuropathy
Exercise for people with peripheral neuropathy (2004) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1 study · 26 participantsModerate
Strengthening exercise vs no exercise
Change in isokinetic knee extension torque (Nm) · patients with people with peripheral neuropathy
Exercise for people with peripheral neuropathy (2004) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1 study · 26 participantsModerate
Strengthening exercise vs no exercise
Change in endurance at 80% MVC (seconds) · patients with people with peripheral neuropathy
Exercise for people with peripheral neuropathy (2004) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1 study · 23 participantsModerate
Strengthening exercise vs no exercise
Change in isokinetic knee flexion torque (Nm) · patients with people with peripheral neuropathy
Exercise for people with peripheral neuropathy (2004) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1 study · 26 participantsModerate
Strengthening exercise vs no exercise
Change in maximal isometric voluntary contraction force (Nm) · patients with people with peripheral neuropathy
Exercise for people with peripheral neuropathy (2004) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1 study · 26 participantsModerate
Lower limb strengthening and balance exercise vs upper limb strengthening exercise
% Change in activities specific balance confidence scale scores ABC scale. Scale from: 0 to 100. · patients with people with peripheral neuropathy
Exercise for people with peripheral neuropathy (2004) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1 study · 16 participantsModerate
Home exercise vs no exercise
Change in average muscle scores AMS. Scale from: 0 to 10. · patients with people with peripheral neuropathy
Exercise for people with peripheral neuropathy (2004) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1 study · 28 participantsModerate