Relapse · people with serious mental illness
ANY FORM OF BRIEF PSYCHOEDUCATION probably leads to lower relapse: 1. Relapse for any reason ‐ medium term compared with for ROUTINE CARE/INFORMATION (moderate certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Global state Global Assessment Scale (GAS) · people with serious mental illness
1 finding from 1 review
Mental state: psychopathology Total endpoint data, BPRS (higher score = worse, scale from: 0‐126) · people with serious mental illness
1 finding from 1 review
Social functioning · people with serious mental illness
1 finding from 1 review
QoL · people with serious mental illness
1 finding from 1 review
Adverse effects: 1. Death ‐ medium term · people with serious mental illness
ANY FORM OF BRIEF PSYCHOEDUCATION showed no clear difference in adverse event: Death ‐ medium term compared with for ROUTINE CARE/INFORMATION (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Compliance with medication · people with severe mental disorders
1 finding from 1 review
Clinical response: mental state ‐ relapse ‐ medium term Relapse rate · people with severe mental disorders
It is very uncertain whether ANY FORM OF BRIEF PSYCHOEDUCATION changes relapse: Relapse for any reason (medium term) compared with CBT (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Disease activity · people with inflammatory bowel disease
1 finding from 1 review
Flare‐ups or relapse (continuous) · people with inflammatory bowel disease
1 finding from 1 review
Flare‐ups or relapse (4‐12 months) (dichotomous outcome) · people with inflammatory bowel disease
It is very uncertain whether patient education and standard care changes flare‐ups or relapse (4‐12 months) (dichotomous outcome) compared with standard care (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Quality of life (2 weeks‐12 months) · people with inflammatory bowel disease
1 finding from 1 review
Leaving the study early · schizophrenia
It is very uncertain whether technology‐mediated psychoeducation changes compliance/satisfaction: leaving the study early ‐ any reason compared with standard care intervention (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Clinical response: no clinically significant response in mental state · schizophrenia
Technology‐mediated psychoeducation showed no clear difference in mental state: not improved ‐ short‐term BPRS compared with standard care intervention (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Global state: not improved ‐ short‐term GAF · schizophrenia
Technology‐mediated psychoeducation showed no clear difference in global state: not improved ‐ short‐term GAF compared with standard care intervention (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Knowledge/insight · schizophrenia
1 finding from 1 review
Quality of life · schizophrenia
1 finding from 1 review
Needs · schizophrenia
1 finding from 1 review
Social support Social Network Interview · schizophrenia
Technology‐mediated psychoeducation led to lower social support Social Network Interview compared with standard care intervention; GRADE not reported.
1 finding from 1 review
Change in DMF increment on occlusal surfaces of first permanent molars · Children and adolescents (general population, aged under 20 years)
Resin-modified glass ionomer fissure sealant plus oral health… showed no clear difference in change in DMF increment on occlusal surfaces of first permanent molars compared with fluoride varnish plus oral health education; GRADE not reported.
2 findings from 1 review
MD 0.07 [-0.03, 0.17]
1 study
GRADE not reported
MD 0.23 [0.02, 0.44]
1 study
GRADE not reported