Gap finder

Search review questions

Each row is one question a systematic review asked: who, what, compared with what, and which outcome, with the effect it found and how certain that is. Words match anywhere in the field.

Limit to evidence status or GRADE (optional)

75,239 questions in 5,342 reviews

current versions
No studies 15,213 · 20.2%Ungraded 10,323 · 13.7%Very low 17,528 · 23.3%Low 17,951 · 23.9%Moderate 11,190 · 14.9%High 3,034 · 4%

Ungraded means an effect was reported without a GRADE rating; it is not a gap. No studies means the review found nothing to answer the question. The six categories are a display order, not a score.

QuestionEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Occlusal splint vs Palatal splint
Preference (device preferred by participants) · People with sleep bruxism (tooth grinding or clenching); children (greater than 1 year old) and adults; diagnosis…
Occlusal splints for treating sleep bruxism (tooth grinding) (2007) · Cochrane
Occlusal splint versus palatal splint, preference (Dube 2004): all participants preferred the palatal splint rather than the occlusal splint; 71% felt the occlusal splint offered greater protection for their teeth. At…1 studyUngraded
Third generation cephalosporins vs conventional therapy
Death · patients treated for acute bacterial meningitis
Third generation cephalosporins versus conventional antibiotics for treating acute bacterial meningitis (2007) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted19 studies · 1496 participantsUngraded
Third generation cephalosporins vs conventional therapy
Death · patients treated for meningococcal meningitis
Third generation cephalosporins versus conventional antibiotics for treating acute bacterial meningitis (2007) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted13 studies · 477 participantsUngraded
Third generation cephalosporins vs conventional antibiotics (high and low/middle‐income countries)
Death · patients treated for acute bacterial meningitis
Third generation cephalosporins versus conventional antibiotics for treating acute bacterial meningitis (2007) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted19 studies · 1301 participantsUngraded
Third generation cephalosporins vs conventional antibiotics (high and low/middle‐income countries)
Death: high‐income countries · patients treated for acute bacterial meningitis
Third generation cephalosporins versus conventional antibiotics for treating acute bacterial meningitis (2007) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted9 studies · 510 participantsUngraded
Third generation cephalosporins vs conventional antibiotics (high and low/middle‐income countries)
Death: Low/middle‐income countries · patients treated for acute bacterial meningitis
Third generation cephalosporins versus conventional antibiotics for treating acute bacterial meningitis (2007) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted10 studies · 791 participantsUngraded
Third generation cephalosporins vs conventional antibiotics (high and low/middle‐income countries)
Deafness · patients treated for acute bacterial meningitis
Third generation cephalosporins versus conventional antibiotics for treating acute bacterial meningitis (2007) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted10 studies · 501 participantsUngraded
Third generation cephalosporins vs conventional antibiotics (high and low/middle‐income countries)
Deafness: high‐income countries · patients treated for acute bacterial meningitis
Third generation cephalosporins versus conventional antibiotics for treating acute bacterial meningitis (2007) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted6 studies · 380 participantsUngraded
Third generation cephalosporins vs conventional antibiotics (high and low/middle‐income countries)
Deafness: low‐income countries · patients treated for acute bacterial meningitis
Third generation cephalosporins versus conventional antibiotics for treating acute bacterial meningitis (2007) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted4 studies · 121 participantsUngraded
Third generation cephalosporins vs conventional therapy
Deafness · patients treated for acute bacterial meningitis
Third generation cephalosporins versus conventional antibiotics for treating acute bacterial meningitis (2007) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted10 studies · 501 participantsUngraded
Third generation cephalosporins vs conventional therapy
Culture positivity 10 to 48 hours start of treatment · patients treated for acute bacterial meningitis
Third generation cephalosporins versus conventional antibiotics for treating acute bacterial meningitis (2007) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted12 studies · 442 participantsUngraded
Third generation cephalosporins vs conventional therapy
Diarrhoea · patients treated for acute bacterial meningitis
Third generation cephalosporins versus conventional antibiotics for treating acute bacterial meningitis (2007) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted12 studies · 750 participantsUngraded
Third generation cephalosporins vs conventional therapy
Neutropenia · patients treated for acute bacterial meningitis
Third generation cephalosporins versus conventional antibiotics for treating acute bacterial meningitis (2007) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted10 studies · 472 participantsUngraded
Third generation cephalosporins vs conventional therapy
Skin rash · patients treated for acute bacterial meningitis
Third generation cephalosporins versus conventional antibiotics for treating acute bacterial meningitis (2007) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted8 studies · 533 participantsUngraded
Third generation cephalosporins vs conventional therapy
Treatment failure (either death or deafness) · patients treated for acute bacterial meningitis
Third generation cephalosporins versus conventional antibiotics for treating acute bacterial meningitis (2007) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted19 studies · 1496 participantsUngraded
Cephalosporins vs conventional therapy
Death · patients treated for H. influenzae meningitis
Third generation cephalosporins versus conventional antibiotics for treating acute bacterial meningitis (2007) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted10 studies · 318 participantsUngraded
Third generation cephalosporins vs conventional antibiotics
Death · patients treated for S. pneumoniae meningitis
Third generation cephalosporins versus conventional antibiotics for treating acute bacterial meningitis (2007) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted11 studies · 129 participantsUngraded
Photodynamic therapy with verteporfin vs photodynamic therapy with 5% dextrose
Loss of 3 or more lines (15 or more letters) visual acuity ETDRS chart · patients with neovascular age‐related macular degeneration
Photodynamic therapy for neovascular age‐related macular degeneration (2007) · Cochrane
RR 0.8 [0.73, 0.88]4 studies · 1381 participantsHigh
Photodynamic therapy with verteporfin vs photodynamic therapy with 5% dextrose
Loss of 6 or more lines (30 or more letters) visual acuity ETDRS chart · patients with neovascular age‐related macular degeneration
Photodynamic therapy for neovascular age‐related macular degeneration (2007) · Cochrane
RR 0.66 [0.53, 0.83]4 studies · 1381 participantsHigh
Photodynamic therapy with verteporfin vs photodynamic therapy with 5% dextrose
Gain of 3 or more lines (15 or more letters) · patients with neovascular age‐related macular degeneration
Photodynamic therapy for neovascular age‐related macular degeneration (2007) · Cochrane
RR 2.23 [1.19, 4.19]3 studies · 941 participantsHigh
Photodynamic therapy with verteporfin vs photodynamic therapy with 5% dextrose
Adverse effects: acute severe visual acuity decrease · patients with neovascular age‐related macular degeneration
Photodynamic therapy for neovascular age‐related macular degeneration (2007) · Cochrane
RR 3.75 [0.87, 16.12]3 studies · 1075 participantsModerate
Photodynamic therapy with verteporfin vs photodynamic therapy with 5% dextrose
Adverse effects: infusion‐related back pain · patients with neovascular age‐related macular degeneration
Photodynamic therapy for neovascular age‐related macular degeneration (2007) · Cochrane
RR 9.93 [2.82, 35.02]4 studies · 1439 participantsHigh
Cryopreservation vs fresh embryos transfer
Moderate and or severe OHSS · patients with risk of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome
Embryo freezing for preventing ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (2007) · Cochrane
OR 0.12 [0.01, 2.29]1 study · 125 participantsLow
Cryopreservation vs fresh embryos transfer
Clinical pregnancies · patients with risk of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome
Embryo freezing for preventing ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (2007) · Cochrane
OR 1.08 [0.54, 2.19]1 study · 125 participantsLow
Cryopreservation vs fresh embryos transfer
Number of livebirths (livebirth rate) · patients with risk of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome
Embryo freezing for preventing ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (2007) · Cochrane
OR 1.03 [0.5, 2.12]1 study · 125 participantsLow
Cryopreservation vs intra‐venous albumin
Moderate and or severe OHSS · patients with risk of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome
Embryo freezing for preventing ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (2007) · Cochrane
OR 5.33 [0.51, 56.24]1 study · 26 participantsVery low
Cryopreservation vs intra‐venous albumin
Nil and or mild OHSS · patients with risk of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome
Embryo freezing for preventing ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (2007) · Cochrane
OR 0.38 [0.08, 1.9]1 study · 26 participantsLow
Cryopreservation vs intra‐venous albumin
Clinical pregnancies · patients with risk of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome
Embryo freezing for preventing ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (2007) · Cochrane
OR 0.06 [0, 1.17]1 study · 26 participantsLow
Intervention NR
Hospital admission/re‐admission · Adults who attend the emergency room for acute asthma
Education interventions for adults who attend the emergency room for acute asthma (2007) · Cochrane
RR 0.5 [0.27, 0.91]5 studies · 572 participantsHigh
Intervention NR
Presentation at emergency department · Adults who attend the emergency room for acute asthma
Education interventions for adults who attend the emergency room for acute asthma (2007) · Cochrane
RR 0.72 [0.47, 1.11]8 studies · 946 participantsLow
Intervention NR
Quality of life (SGRQ) ‐ Total scores SGRQ units. Scale from: 0 to 100. · Adults who attend the emergency room for acute asthma
Education interventions for adults who attend the emergency room for acute asthma (2007) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted2 studies · 356 participantsLow
Intervention NR
Mental state: 1a. Overall no clinically important improvement (BPRS) ‐ short term 25‐30% change BPRS1,2 ( · people with schizophrenia
Morita therapy for schizophrenia (2007) · Cochrane
RR 0.36 [0.13, 1.03]1 study · 66 participantsLow
Intervention NR
Mental state: 1a. Overall no clinically important improvement (BPRS) ‐ medium term 25‐30% change BPRS1,2 ( · people with schizophrenia
Morita therapy for schizophrenia (2007) · Cochrane
RR 0.36 [0.14, 0.89]1 study · 76 participantsLow
Itraconazole vs Fluconazole
Death associated with fungal infection · Patients with cancer receiving chemotherapy or radiotherapy or both
Interventions for preventing oral candidiasis for patients with cancer receiving treatment (2007) · Cochrane
RR 0.14 [0.01, 2.73]1 study · 202 participantsUngraded
Psychological intervention based on a specified psychological model/theory (to increase adherence to oral hygiene instructions) vs Attention control (attention/contact without an active psychological intervention)
Self-reported flossing · Adults (aged 18 or over) diagnosed with periodontal disease (gingivitis or periodontitis) · 5 weeks (2 weeks post-intervention)
Psychological interventions to improve adherence to oral hygiene instructions in adults with periodontal… (2007) · Cochrane
Stewart 1991: there were no differences between the attention control group and the cognitive behavioural (psychological) intervention group for self reported flossing; it cannot be concluded that the cognitive…1 study · 50 participantsUngraded
Itraconazole vs Fluconazole
Good compliance · Patients with cancer receiving chemotherapy or radiotherapy or both
Interventions for preventing oral candidiasis for patients with cancer receiving treatment (2007) · Cochrane
RR 0.95 [0.85, 1.05]1 study · 202 participantsUngraded
Psychological intervention based on a specified psychological model/theory (to increase adherence to oral hygiene instructions) vs No (active) intervention (usual/standard dental care or no-treatment control)
Observed tooth brushing skill · Adults (aged 18 or over) diagnosed with periodontal disease (gingivitis or periodontitis) · 4 months
Psychological interventions to improve adherence to oral hygiene instructions in adults with periodontal… (2007) · Cochrane
Little 1997 observed and rated participants on brushing skill; Analysis of Covariance found a significant difference favouring the intervention group (one of four measures on which significant differences were found…1 study · 107 participantsUngraded
Psychological intervention based on a specified psychological model/theory (to increase adherence to oral hygiene instructions) vs No (active) intervention (usual/standard dental care or no-treatment control)
Dental knowledge · Adults (aged 18 or over) diagnosed with periodontal disease (gingivitis or periodontitis)
Psychological interventions to improve adherence to oral hygiene instructions in adults with periodontal… (2007) · Cochrane
Stewart 1996: for dental knowledge the control group showed no change pre- and post-intervention, whereas the psychological intervention group improved dental knowledge significantly (both intervention groups improved…1 study · 117 participantsUngraded
Psychological intervention based on a specified psychological model/theory (to increase adherence to oral hygiene instructions) vs Educational intervention (oral hygiene education/instruction)
Self-reported tooth brushing · Adults (aged 18 or over) diagnosed with periodontal disease (gingivitis or periodontitis) · 5 weeks (2 weeks post-intervention)
Psychological interventions to improve adherence to oral hygiene instructions in adults with periodontal… (2007) · Cochrane
Stewart 1991: for self reported brushing only the comparison of the control group with the cognitive behavioural intervention was significant; the cognitive behavioural (psychological) intervention showed no…1 study · 50 participantsUngraded
Antifungal drugs partially absorbed from GI tract (miconazole, clotrimazole) vs Placebo or no treatment
Empirical antifungal treatment · Patients with cancer receiving chemotherapy or radiotherapy or both
Interventions for preventing oral candidiasis for patients with cancer receiving treatment (2007) · Cochrane
RR 3.38 [0.15, 77.12]1 study · 32 participantsUngraded
Paracetamol (single oral dose, any dose or formulation; subgroups up to 1000 mg and 1000 mg or more) vs Placebo
Patients with one or more adverse events · Patients requiring surgical removal of a lower wisdom tooth or teeth, with baseline moderate to severe pain (surgery… · up to 7 days
Paracetamol for pain relief after surgical removal of lower wisdom teeth (2007) · Cochrane
RR 1.19 [0.90, 1.57]17 studies · 1645 participantsUngraded
Post and core restoration with a ferrule vs Post and core restoration without a ferrule
Outcome NR · Participants with permanent endodontically-treated (root-filled) teeth for which a post is indicated to retain the… · Minimum 6 months (planned)
Root canal posts for the restoration of root filled teeth (2007) · Cochrane
No included trial evaluated the presence of a ferrule (a planned secondary comparison); no eligible study identified.0 studiesNo studies
Non-metal carbon-fibre post and core (Category III; Composipost) vs Metal custom-cast post and core (Category I; gold alloy)
Clinical/technical failure (root fracture) · Participants with permanent endodontically-treated (root-filled) teeth for which a post is indicated to retain the… · 48 months (4 years)
Root canal posts for the restoration of root filled teeth (2007) · Cochrane
RR 0.05 [0.00, 0.90]1 study · 195 participantsUngraded
Antifungal drugs absorbed from GI tract vs Antifungal drugs not absorbed from GI tract
Death associated with fungal infection · Patients with cancer receiving chemotherapy or radiotherapy or both
Interventions for preventing oral candidiasis for patients with cancer receiving treatment (2007) · Cochrane
RR 1.25 [0.38, 4.13]3 studies · 981 participantsUngraded
Occlusal splint vs Palatal splint
Number of bruxism episodes per hour of sleep (Epi/h) · People with sleep bruxism (tooth grinding or clenching); children (greater than 1 year old) and adults; diagnosis…
Occlusal splints for treating sleep bruxism (tooth grinding) (2007) · Cochrane
MD 0.54 [-10.95, 12.93]1 studyUngraded
Paracetamol (single oral dose, any dose or formulation; subgroups up to 1000 mg and 1000 mg or more) vs Placebo
Achieving at least 50% pain relief at 6 hours (using pain relief measurements / TOTPAR) · Patients requiring surgical removal of a lower wisdom tooth or teeth, with baseline moderate to severe pain (surgery… · 6 hours
Paracetamol for pain relief after surgical removal of lower wisdom teeth (2007) · Cochrane
RR 3.32 [1.88, 5.87]13 studies · 1155 participantsUngraded
Paracetamol (single oral dose, any dose or formulation; subgroups up to 1000 mg and 1000 mg or more) vs Placebo
Achieving at least 50% pain relief at 4 hours (using pain relief measurements / TOTPAR) · Patients requiring surgical removal of a lower wisdom tooth or teeth, with baseline moderate to severe pain (surgery… · 4 hours
Paracetamol for pain relief after surgical removal of lower wisdom teeth (2007) · Cochrane
RR 2.85 [1.89, 4.29]16 studies · 1498 participantsUngraded
Psychological intervention based on a specified psychological model/theory (to increase adherence to oral hygiene instructions) vs No (active) intervention (usual/standard dental care or no-treatment control)
Self-efficacy beliefs (tooth brushing) · Adults (aged 18 or over) diagnosed with periodontal disease (gingivitis or periodontitis)
Psychological interventions to improve adherence to oral hygiene instructions in adults with periodontal… (2007) · Cochrane
Stewart 1996: the psychological intervention had no discernible effect on self efficacy beliefs concerning tooth brushing; the data on perceived self efficacy for tooth brushing were not analysed due to ceiling effects…1 study · 117 participantsUngraded
Potassium nitrate/polycarboxylate cement (KNO3/PCa) vs Polycarboxylate cement (PCa) alone
Clinical success (absence of periapical pathology, tenderness to pressure and fistula formation) at 24 months · Adults with asymptomatic vital pulpal exposures from caries · 24 months
Pulp management for caries in adults: maintaining pulp vitality (2007) · Cochrane
Hodosh 2003 (Analysis 3.1): 9/17 in the KNO3/PCa group and 10/12 in the PCa group developed clinical symptoms requiring endodontic therapy or extraction. No significance test reported for this specific contrast; no…1 study · 29 participantsUngraded
Life (calcium hydroxide pulp-capping material) vs Dycal (calcium hydroxide pulp-capping material)
Clinical symptoms at 12 months · Adults (aged 20 to 60 years, mean 27) with deep carious lesions in permanent teeth (indirect or direct pulp capping,… · 12 months, Indirect pulp capping
Pulp management for caries in adults: maintaining pulp vitality (2007) · Cochrane
Analysis 2.1 (clinical symptoms at 12 months following indirect pulp capping, Life vs Dycal). Fitzgerald 1991: 151 teeth in 55 patients (analysis at tooth level, not patient level); substantial attrition (11 teeth lost…1 study · 151 participantsUngraded