Gap finder

Search review questions

Each row is one question a systematic review asked: who, what, compared with what, and which outcome, with the effect it found and how certain that is. Words match anywhere in the field.

Limit to evidence status or GRADE (optional)

3,601 questions in 252 reviews · Pregnancy and Childbirth

current versions
No studies 726 · 20.2%Ungraded 421 · 11.7%Very low 828 · 23%Low 993 · 27.6%Moderate 486 · 13.5%High 147 · 4.1%

Ungraded means an effect was reported without a GRADE rating; it is not a gap. No studies means the review found nothing to answer the question. The six categories are a display order, not a score.

QuestionEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Second trimester routine vs selective ultrasound
Birth before 34 weeks' gestation · Fetal ultrasound assessment before 24 weeks' gestation
Routine ultrasound for fetal assessment before 24 weeks' gestation (2021) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted0 studies · 0 participantsUngraded
First trimester routine vs selective ultrasound
Perinatal loss · Fetal ultrasound assessment before 24 weeks' gestation
Routine ultrasound for fetal assessment before 24 weeks' gestation (2021) · Cochrane
RR 0.97 [0.55, 1.73]1 study · 648 participantsLow
First trimester routine vs selective ultrasound
Induction of labour for post‐maturity · Fetal ultrasound assessment before 24 weeks' gestation
Routine ultrasound for fetal assessment before 24 weeks' gestation (2021) · Cochrane
RR 0.83 [0.5, 1.37]3 studies · 1474 participantsLow
First trimester routine vs selective ultrasound
Termination for major abnormality · Fetal ultrasound assessment before 24 weeks' gestation
Routine ultrasound for fetal assessment before 24 weeks' gestation (2021) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted0 studies · 0 participantsUngraded
First trimester routine vs selective ultrasound
Birth before 34 weeks' gestation · Fetal ultrasound assessment before 24 weeks' gestation
Routine ultrasound for fetal assessment before 24 weeks' gestation (2021) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted0 studies · 0 participantsUngraded
Second trimester routine vs selective ultrasound
Perinatal loss · Fetal ultrasound assessment before 24 weeks' gestation
Routine ultrasound for fetal assessment before 24 weeks' gestation (2021) · Cochrane
RR 0.98 [0.81, 1.2]3 studies · 17918 participantsModerate
Second trimester routine vs selective ultrasound
Induction of labour for post‐maturity · Fetal ultrasound assessment before 24 weeks' gestation
Routine ultrasound for fetal assessment before 24 weeks' gestation (2021) · Cochrane
RR 0.48 [0.31, 0.73]6 studies · 24174 participantsModerate
Second trimester routine vs selective ultrasound
Termination of pregnancy for fetal abnormality · Fetal ultrasound assessment before 24 weeks' gestation
Routine ultrasound for fetal assessment before 24 weeks' gestation (2021) · Cochrane
RR 2.36 [1.13, 4.93]4 studies · 26893 participantsModerate
Second trimester routine vs selective ultrasound
Maternal anxiety · Fetal ultrasound assessment before 24 weeks' gestation
Routine ultrasound for fetal assessment before 24 weeks' gestation (2021) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted0 studies · 0 participantsUngraded
Amniotic membranes sweeping vs no treatment/sham
Spontaneous onset of labour · pregnant women carrying a live fetus at or near term (≥ 36 weeks' gestation).
Membrane sweeping for induction of labour (2020) · Cochrane
RR 1.21 [1.08, 1.34]17 studies · 3170 participantsLow
Amniotic membranes sweeping vs vaginal/intracervical prostaglandins
Caesarean section · pregnant women carrying a live fetus at or near term (≥ 36 weeks' gestation).
Membrane sweeping for induction of labour (2020) · Cochrane
RR 0.69 [0.44, 1.09]3 studies · 339 participantsLow
Amniotic membranes sweeping vs vaginal/intracervical prostaglandins
Spontaneous vaginal birth · pregnant women carrying a live fetus at or near term (≥ 36 weeks' gestation).
Membrane sweeping for induction of labour (2020) · Cochrane
RR 1.12 [0.95, 1.32]2 studies · 252 participantsLow
Amniotic membranes sweeping vs vaginal/intracervical prostaglandins
Uterine hyperstimulation with/without fetal heart rate (FHR) changes ‐ not reported · pregnant women carrying a live fetus at or near term (≥ 36 weeks' gestation).
Membrane sweeping for induction of labour (2020) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Amniotic membranes sweeping vs vaginal/intracervical prostaglandins
Maternal death or serious maternal morbidity · pregnant women carrying a live fetus at or near term (≥ 36 weeks' gestation).
Membrane sweeping for induction of labour (2020) · Cochrane
RR 0.93 [0.27, 3.21]1 study · 87 participantsLow
Amniotic membranes sweeping vs vaginal/intracervical prostaglandins
Neonatal death or serious neonatal perinatal morbidity · pregnant women carrying a live fetus at or near term (≥ 36 weeks' gestation).
Membrane sweeping for induction of labour (2020) · Cochrane
RR 0.4 [0.12, 1.33]2 studies · 269 participantsLow
Amniotic membranes sweeping vs intravenous oxytocin/amniotomy
Spontaneous onset of labour · pregnant women carrying a live fetus at or near term (≥ 36 weeks' gestation).
Membrane sweeping for induction of labour (2020) · Cochrane
RR 1.32 [0.88, 1.96]1 study · 69 participantsLow
Amniotic membranes sweeping vs intravenous oxytocin/amniotomy
Induction of labour · pregnant women carrying a live fetus at or near term (≥ 36 weeks' gestation).
Membrane sweeping for induction of labour (2020) · Cochrane
RR 0.51 [0.05, 5.42]1 study · 69 participantsLow
Amniotic membranes sweeping vs intravenous oxytocin/amniotomy
Caesarean section · pregnant women carrying a live fetus at or near term (≥ 36 weeks' gestation).
Membrane sweeping for induction of labour (2020) · Cochrane
RR 0.69 [0.12, 3.85]1 study · 69 participantsLow
Amniotic membranes sweeping vs intravenous oxytocin/amniotomy
Spontaneous vaginal birth ‐ not reported · pregnant women carrying a live fetus at or near term (≥ 36 weeks' gestation).
Membrane sweeping for induction of labour (2020) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Amniotic membranes sweeping vs intravenous oxytocin/amniotomy
Uterine hyperstimulation with/without fetal heart (FHR) rate changes ‐ not reported · pregnant women carrying a live fetus at or near term (≥ 36 weeks' gestation).
Membrane sweeping for induction of labour (2020) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Amniotic membranes sweeping vs no treatment/sham
Induction of labour · pregnant women carrying a live fetus at or near term (≥ 36 weeks' gestation).
Membrane sweeping for induction of labour (2020) · Cochrane
RR 0.73 [0.56, 0.94]16 studies · 3224 participantsLow
Amniotic membranes sweeping vs intravenous oxytocin/amniotomy
Maternal death or serious maternal morbidity · pregnant women carrying a live fetus at or near term (≥ 36 weeks' gestation).
Membrane sweeping for induction of labour (2020) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1 study · 69 participantsLow
Amniotic membranes sweeping vs intravenous oxytocin/amniotomy
Neonatal death or serious neonatal perinatal morbidity · pregnant women carrying a live fetus at or near term (≥ 36 weeks' gestation).
Membrane sweeping for induction of labour (2020) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Amniotic membranes sweeping vs vaginal/oral misoprostol
Spontaneous onset of labour ‐ not reported · pregnant women carrying a live fetus at or near term (≥ 36 weeks' gestation).
Membrane sweeping for induction of labour (2020) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Amniotic membranes sweeping vs vaginal/oral misoprostol
Induction of labour ‐ not reported · pregnant women carrying a live fetus at or near term (≥ 36 weeks' gestation).
Membrane sweeping for induction of labour (2020) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Amniotic membranes sweeping vs vaginal/oral misoprostol
Caesarean section · pregnant women carrying a live fetus at or near term (≥ 36 weeks' gestation).
Membrane sweeping for induction of labour (2020) · Cochrane
RR 0.82 [0.31, 2.17]1 study · 96 participantsLow
Amniotic membranes sweeping vs vaginal/oral misoprostol
Spontaneous vaginal birth ‐ not reported · pregnant women carrying a live fetus at or near term (≥ 36 weeks' gestation).
Membrane sweeping for induction of labour (2020) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Amniotic membranes sweeping vs vaginal/oral misoprostol
Uterine hyperstimulation with/without fetal heart rate (FHR) changes ‐ not reported · pregnant women carrying a live fetus at or near term (≥ 36 weeks' gestation).
Membrane sweeping for induction of labour (2020) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Amniotic membranes sweeping vs vaginal/oral misoprostol
Maternal death or serious maternal morbidity · pregnant women carrying a live fetus at or near term (≥ 36 weeks' gestation).
Membrane sweeping for induction of labour (2020) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Amniotic membranes sweeping vs vaginal/oral misoprostol
Neonatal death or serious neonatal perinatal morbidity ‐ not reported · pregnant women carrying a live fetus at or near term (≥ 36 weeks' gestation).
Membrane sweeping for induction of labour (2020) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
One frequency of amniotic membranes sweeping vs another frequency of amniotic membrane sweeping
Spontaneous onset of labour ‐ not reported · pregnant women carrying a live fetus at or near term (≥ 36 weeks' gestation).
Membrane sweeping for induction of labour (2020) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Amniotic membranes sweeping vs no treatment/sham
Caesarean section · pregnant women carrying a live fetus at or near term (≥ 36 weeks' gestation).
Membrane sweeping for induction of labour (2020) · Cochrane
RR 0.94 [0.85, 1.04]32 studies · 5499 participantsModerate
One frequency of amniotic membranes sweeping vs another frequency of amniotic membrane sweeping
Induction of labour · pregnant women carrying a live fetus at or near term (≥ 36 weeks' gestation).
Membrane sweeping for induction of labour (2020) · Cochrane
RR 1.19 [0.76, 1.85]1 study · 234 participantsLow
One frequency of amniotic membranes sweeping vs another frequency of amniotic membrane sweeping
Caesarean section · pregnant women carrying a live fetus at or near term (≥ 36 weeks' gestation).
Membrane sweeping for induction of labour (2020) · Cochrane
RR 0.93 [0.6, 1.46]1 study · 234 participantsLow
One frequency of amniotic membranes sweeping vs another frequency of amniotic membrane sweeping
Spontaneous vaginal birth · pregnant women carrying a live fetus at or near term (≥ 36 weeks' gestation).
Membrane sweeping for induction of labour (2020) · Cochrane
RR 1 [0.86, 1.17]1 study · 234 participantsModerate
One frequency of amniotic membranes sweeping vs another frequency of amniotic membrane sweeping
Uterine hyperstimulation with/without fetal heart rate (FHR) changes ‐ not reported · pregnant women carrying a live fetus at or near term (≥ 36 weeks' gestation).
Membrane sweeping for induction of labour (2020) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
One frequency of amniotic membranes sweeping vs another frequency of amniotic membrane sweeping
Maternal death or serious maternal morbidity · pregnant women carrying a live fetus at or near term (≥ 36 weeks' gestation).
Membrane sweeping for induction of labour (2020) · Cochrane
RR 0.78 [0.3, 2.02]1 study · 234 participantsLow
One frequency of amniotic membranes sweeping vs another frequency of amniotic membrane sweeping
Neonatal death or serious neonatal perinatal morbidity · pregnant women carrying a live fetus at or near term (≥ 36 weeks' gestation).
Membrane sweeping for induction of labour (2020) · Cochrane
RR 2 [0.18, 21.76]1 study · 234 participantsLow
Amniotic membranes sweeping vs no treatment/sham
Spontaneous vaginal birth · pregnant women carrying a live fetus at or near term (≥ 36 weeks' gestation).
Membrane sweeping for induction of labour (2020) · Cochrane
RR 1.03 [0.99, 1.07]26 studies · 4538 participantsModerate
Amniotic membranes sweeping vs no treatment/sham
Uterine hyperstimulation with/without fetal heart rate (FHR) changes ‐ not reported · pregnant women carrying a live fetus at or near term (≥ 36 weeks' gestation).
Membrane sweeping for induction of labour (2020) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Amniotic membranes sweeping vs no treatment/sham
Maternal death or serious maternal morbidity · pregnant women carrying a live fetus at or near term (≥ 36 weeks' gestation).
Membrane sweeping for induction of labour (2020) · Cochrane
RR 0.83 [0.57, 1.2]17 studies · 2749 participantsLow
Amniotic membranes sweeping vs no treatment/sham
Neonatal death or serious neonatal perinatal morbidity · pregnant women carrying a live fetus at or near term (≥ 36 weeks' gestation).
Membrane sweeping for induction of labour (2020) · Cochrane
RR 0.83 [0.59, 1.17]18 studies · 3696 participantsLow
Amniotic membranes sweeping vs vaginal/intracervical prostaglandins
Spontaneous onset of labour · pregnant women carrying a live fetus at or near term (≥ 36 weeks' gestation).
Membrane sweeping for induction of labour (2020) · Cochrane
RR 1.24 [0.98, 1.57]3 studies · 339 participantsLow
Amniotic membranes sweeping vs vaginal/intracervical prostaglandins
Induction of labour · pregnant women carrying a live fetus at or near term (≥ 36 weeks' gestation).
Membrane sweeping for induction of labour (2020) · Cochrane
RR 0.9 [0.56, 1.45]2 studies · 157 participantsLow
Ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) vs placebo
Pruritus score* (points out of 100 mm visual analogue scale) · pregnant women with intrahepatic cholestasis
Pharmacological interventions for treating intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy (2020) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted2 studies · 715 participantsModerate
Ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) vs placebo
Stillbirth · pregnant women with intrahepatic cholestasis
Pharmacological interventions for treating intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy (2020) · Cochrane
RR 0.33 [0.08, 1.37]6 studies · 955 participantsVery low
Ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) vs placebo
Fetal distress/asphyxial events · pregnant women with intrahepatic cholestasis
Pharmacological interventions for treating intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy (2020) · Cochrane
RR 0.7 [0.35, 1.4]6 studies · 944 participantsVery low
Intervention NR
Crystalloid vs control · women having spinal anaesthesia for caesarean section
Techniques for preventing hypotension during spinal anaesthesia for caesarean section (2020) · Cochrane
RR 0.84 [0.72, 0.98]5 studies · 370 participantsLow
Crystalloid vs control
Maternal nausea and/or vomiting · women having spinal anaesthesia for caesarean section
Techniques for preventing hypotension during spinal anaesthesia for caesarean section (2020) · Cochrane
RR 0.19 [0.01, 3.91]1 study · 69 participantsVery low
Crystalloid vs control
Neonatal acidosis as defined by cord or neonatal blood with a pH < 7.2 · women having spinal anaesthesia for caesarean section
Techniques for preventing hypotension during spinal anaesthesia for caesarean section (2020) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies