What do systematic reviews say?

Intervention not reported

• Push versus gravity for intermittent bolus gavage tube feeding of preterm and low birth weight infants 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  0 participants
  GRADE not reported

Intervention not reported

• Push versus gravity for intermittent bolus gavage tube feeding of preterm and low birth weight infants 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  1 study · 31 participants
  Very low

Intervention not reported

• Push versus gravity for intermittent bolus gavage tube feeding of preterm and low birth weight infants 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  1 study · 31 participants
  Very low

Intervention not reported

• Push versus gravity for intermittent bolus gavage tube feeding of preterm and low birth weight infants 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  1 study · 31 participants
  Very low

Intervention not reported

• Push versus gravity for intermittent bolus gavage tube feeding of preterm and low birth weight infants 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  1 study · 31 participants
  Very low

High vs standard volume of fortified human milk or preterm formula

• High versus standard volume enteral feeds to promote growth in preterm or low birth weight infants 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  2 studies · 271 participants
  Moderate

High vs standard volume of unfortified human milk or term formula

It is very uncertain whether high changes necrotising enterocolitis compared with standard volume of unfortified human milk or term formula (very low certainty).

• High versus standard volume enteral feeds to promote growth in preterm or low birth weight infants 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  RR 1.03 [0.07, 15.78]
  1 study · 61 participants
  Very low

High vs standard volume of fortified human milk or preterm formula

• High versus standard volume enteral feeds to promote growth in preterm or low birth weight infants 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  2 studies · 271 participants
  Low

High vs standard volume of fortified human milk or preterm formula

• High versus standard volume enteral feeds to promote growth in preterm or low birth weight infants 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  2 studies · 271 participants
  Low

High vs standard volume of fortified human milk or preterm formula

High showed no clear difference in extrauterine growth restriction at discharge compared with standard volume of fortified human milk or preterm formula (low certainty).

• High versus standard volume enteral feeds to promote growth in preterm or low birth weight infants 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  RR 0.71 [0.5, 1.02]
  2 studies · 271 participants
  Low

High vs standard volume of fortified human milk or preterm formula

It is very uncertain whether high changes necrotising enterocolitis compared with standard volume of fortified human milk or preterm formula (very low certainty).

• High versus standard volume enteral feeds to promote growth in preterm or low birth weight infants 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  RR 0.74 [0.12, 4.51]
  2 studies · 283 participants
  Very low

High vs standard volume of unfortified human milk or term formula

• High versus standard volume enteral feeds to promote growth in preterm or low birth weight infants 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  1 study · 61 participants
  Moderate

High vs standard volume of unfortified human milk or term formula

• High versus standard volume enteral feeds to promote growth in preterm or low birth weight infants 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  0 studies · 0 participants
  GRADE not reported

High vs standard volume of unfortified human milk or term formula

• High versus standard volume enteral feeds to promote growth in preterm or low birth weight infants 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  0 studies · 0 participants
  GRADE not reported

High vs standard volume of unfortified human milk or term formula

• High versus standard volume enteral feeds to promote growth in preterm or low birth weight infants 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  0 studies · 0 participants
  GRADE not reported

Very high protein vs high protein intake (restricted to studies meeting all a priori inclusion criteria)

• Higher versus lower protein intake in formula‐fed low birth weight infants 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  1 study · 77 participants
  Moderate

Very high protein vs high protein intake (restricted to studies meeting all a priori inclusion criteria)

• Higher versus lower protein intake in formula‐fed low birth weight infants 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  1 study · 77 participants
  Moderate

Very high protein vs high protein intake (restricted to studies meeting all a priori inclusion criteria)

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

• Higher versus lower protein intake in formula‐fed low birth weight infants 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  Studies not reported
  No studies found

Very high protein vs high protein intake (restricted to studies meeting all a priori inclusion criteria)

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

• Higher versus lower protein intake in formula‐fed low birth weight infants 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  Studies not reported
  No studies found

Very high protein vs high protein intake (restricted to studies meeting all a priori inclusion criteria)

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

• Higher versus lower protein intake in formula‐fed low birth weight infants 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  Studies not reported
  No studies found