Cochrane · systematic review · CD005249
Push versus gravity for intermittent bolus gavage tube feeding of preterm and low birth weight infants
Dawson, JA, Summan, R, Badawi, N, et al. · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · 2021 · Cochrane Library
NeonatalAMSTAR 2: not assessed
SoF tableOnly the outcomes this review put in its Summary of Findings table are listed (the Cochrane Handbook caps them at about seven per comparison). Its other analyses are not shown here.
Questions
6
current version
GRADE rated
4
No studies
0
Included studies
NR
No studies 0 · 0%Ungraded 2 · 33.3%Very low 4 · 66.7%Low 0 · 0%Moderate 0 · 0%High 0 · 0%
Ungraded means an effect was reported without a GRADE rating; it is not a gap. No studies means the review found nothing to answer the question. The six categories are a display order, not a score.
Questions and results
Summary of findings
Population: intermittent bolus gavage tube feeding of preterm and low birth weight infants
| Outcome | Effect | Evidence | Status / GRADE |
|---|---|---|---|
Time taken to establish full gavage feeding (days) | no estimate extracted | 0 participants | Ungraded |
Feeding intolerance (number of episodes per day) | no estimate extracted | 0 participants | Ungraded |
Respiratory rate (breaths per minute) at completion of feed | no estimate extracted | 1 study · 31 participants | Very low Downgraded: imprecision |
Respiratory rate (breaths per minute) | no estimate extracted | 1 study · 31 participants | Very low Downgraded: imprecision |
Heart rate (beats per minute) at completion of feed | no estimate extracted | 1 study · 31 participants | Very low Downgraded: imprecision |
Heart rate (beats per minute) | no estimate extracted | 1 study · 31 participants | Very low Downgraded: imprecision |