Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

Refine by population, intervention, comparison or outcome
More filters
Evidence found and GRADE certainty

1,773 questions · 1,817 findings · 212 reviews · Headline outcomes only

No studies found 383 · 21.1%GRADE not reported 192 · 10.6%Very low 472 · 26%Low 444 · 24.4%Moderate 228 · 12.5%High 98 · 5.4%

Summary of findings table ‐ Adhesiolysis vs no surgery or diagnostic laparoscopy

Effectiveness of treatment · health problem or population
3 findings from 1 review

Standard polyurethane plus tissue adhesive vs standard polyurethane

Arterial catheter failure assessed during catheter dwell · people with arterial catheter dressing and securement

It is very uncertain whether standard polyurethane plus tissue adhesive changes arterial catheter failure assessed during catheter dwell compared with standard polyurethane (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Standard polyurethane plus tissue adhesive vs standard polyurethane

Dislodgement assessed during catheter dwell · people with arterial catheter dressing and securement

It is very uncertain whether standard polyurethane plus tissue adhesive changes dislodgement assessed during catheter dwell compared with standard polyurethane (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Standard polyurethane plus tissue adhesive vs standard polyurethane

Occlusion assessed during catheter dwell · people with arterial catheter dressing and securement

It is very uncertain whether standard polyurethane plus tissue adhesive changes occlusion assessed during catheter dwell compared with standard polyurethane (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Standard polyurethane plus tissue adhesive vs standard polyurethane

Adverse events assessed during catheter dwell and on product removal · people with arterial catheter dressing and securement

It is very uncertain whether standard polyurethane plus tissue adhesive changes adverse events assessed during catheter dwell and on product removal compared with standard polyurethane (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Anaesthesia depth monitors (BIS and M‐entropy) vs standard monitoring

Awareness Postoperative interview · patients with prevention of recall of events during surgery

Anaesthesia depth monitors (BIS and M‐entropy) showed no clear difference in awareness Postoperative interview compared with standard clinical and electronic monitoring (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Anaesthesia depth monitors (BIS and M‐entropy) vs standard monitoring

Adverse effects of intraoperative wakefulness and/or postoperative awareness (i.e. post‐traumatic stress syndrome, myocardial infarction, cardiac arrest, etc.) · patients with prevention of recall of events during surgery

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Summary of findings table ‐ Service system approaches vs inactive control (usual care care, attention control, waitlist)

Trauma‐related symptoms ‐ post‐intervention ‐ not reported · for parents who are experiencing CPTSD symptoms or have experienced maltreatment in their childhood

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Summary of findings table ‐ Service system approaches vs inactive control (usual care care, attention control, waitlist)

Psychological well‐being (secondary outcome) Not addressed · for parents who are experiencing CPTSD symptoms or have experienced maltreatment in their childhood
1 finding from 1 review

Summary of findings table ‐ Service system approaches vs inactive control (usual care care, attention control, waitlist)

Substance use ‐ post‐intervention ‐ not reported · for parents who are experiencing CPTSD symptoms or have experienced maltreatment in their childhood

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Summary of findings table ‐ Service system approaches vs inactive control (usual care care, attention control, waitlist)

Parent relationship quality ‐ not reported · for parents who are experiencing CPTSD symptoms or have experienced maltreatment in their childhood

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review