What do systematic reviews say?

SDAC + hospital intervention vs hospital intervention

• First aid interventions by laypeople for acute oral poisoning 2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  1 study · 68 participants
  Very low

SDAC + hospital intervention vs hospital intervention

It is very uncertain whether SDAC + hospital intervention changes incidence of hospitalization compared with hospital intervention alone (very low certainty).

• First aid interventions by laypeople for acute oral poisoning 2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  RR 1.57 [1.22, 2.02]
  1 study · 1479 participants
  Very low

SDAC + hospital intervention vs hospital intervention

It is very uncertain whether SDAC + hospital intervention changes incidence of ICU admission compared with hospital intervention alone (very low certainty).

• First aid interventions by laypeople for acute oral poisoning 2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  RR 2.33 [1.42, 3.82]
  1 study · 1479 participants
  Very low

SDAC + hospital intervention vs hospital intervention

SDAC + hospital intervention showed no clear difference in incidence of mortality compared with hospital intervention alone (low certainty).

• First aid interventions by laypeople for acute oral poisoning 2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  Peto OR 1.04 [0.79, 1.37]
  2 studies · 3425 participants
  Low

SDAC + hospital intervention vs hospital intervention

• First aid interventions by laypeople for acute oral poisoning 2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  3 studies · 4904 participants
  Very low

Telephone support vs non‐telephone support intervention

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

• Telephone interventions, delivered by healthcare professionals, for providing education and psychosocial support for… 2019 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  Studies not reported
  No studies found

Telephone support vs non‐telephone support intervention

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

• Telephone interventions, delivered by healthcare professionals, for providing education and psychosocial support for… 2019 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  Studies not reported
  No studies found

Any intervention to manage relapse: fixed options (labial braces, lingual braces, fixed lingual wire) or removable options (Hawley's retainer with spring elastomeric module, Bloore removable aligner, other Hawley's retainer modifications, Invisalign, Clearstep) vs no intervention or another intervention

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

• Interventions for managing relapse of the lower front teeth after orthodontic treatment 2013 · Cochrane All outcomes
  No RCTs met the inclusion criteria for this review. After deduplication, the electronic searching identified 527 publications; after reviewing the titles and abstracts, none focused on interventions to correct the…
  0 studies
  No studies found

Combination of lidocaine intraperitoneal instillation plus intramuscular morphine vs lidocaine intraperitoneal instillation alone

• Interventions for intra‐operative pain relief during postpartum mini‐laparotomy tubal ligation 2019 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  Studies not reported
  Low

Combination of lidocaine intraperitoneal instillation plus intramuscular morphine vs IM morphine

• Interventions for intra‐operative pain relief during postpartum mini‐laparotomy tubal ligation 2019 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  Studies not reported
  Low

Ozone applied to the carious lesion (10 or 40 seconds), with a fluoride reductant and oral hygiene/preventive advice vs No ozone, with a fluoride reductant and oral hygiene/preventive advice (as in the intervention group)

• Ozone therapy for the treatment of dental caries 2004 · Cochrane All outcomes

  To 6 months
  Baysan 2003 stated that no adverse events were reported to 6 months; no information was provided by Abu-Naba'a 2003 or Abu-Naba'a 2003pilot.
  1 study
  GRADE not reported

Ozone applied to the carious lesion (10 or 40 seconds), with a fluoride reductant and oral hygiene/preventive advice vs No ozone, with a fluoride reductant and oral hygiene/preventive advice (as in the intervention group)

• Ozone therapy for the treatment of dental caries 2004 · Cochrane All outcomes
  Abu-Naba'a 2003 reported participants' state of anxiety, comparing ozone treatment with traditional dental interventions (injection, drilling, filling); because no participant was randomised between ozone and drilling…
  1 study
  GRADE not reported

Ozone applied to the carious lesion (10 or 40 seconds), with a fluoride reductant and oral hygiene/preventive advice vs No ozone, with a fluoride reductant and oral hygiene/preventive advice (as in the intervention group)

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

• Ozone therapy for the treatment of dental caries 2004 · Cochrane All outcomes
  Data were not provided by any study on the number of lesions requiring restorations to 6 months or later; no data on any further conventional treatment or other dental interventions.
  Studies not reported
  No studies found

Ozone applied to the carious lesion (10 or 40 seconds), with a fluoride reductant and oral hygiene/preventive advice vs No ozone, with a fluoride reductant and oral hygiene/preventive advice (as in the intervention group)

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

• Ozone therapy for the treatment of dental caries 2004 · Cochrane All outcomes
  No data were provided in any of the included trials on costs.
  Studies not reported
  No studies found

Ozone applied to the carious lesion (10 or 40 seconds), with a fluoride reductant and oral hygiene/preventive advice vs No ozone, with a fluoride reductant and oral hygiene/preventive advice (as in the intervention group)

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

• Ozone therapy for the treatment of dental caries 2004 · Cochrane All outcomes
  No data were provided in any of the included trials on pain.
  Studies not reported
  No studies found

Ozone applied to the carious lesion (10 or 40 seconds), with a fluoride reductant and oral hygiene/preventive advice vs No ozone, with a fluoride reductant and oral hygiene/preventive advice (as in the intervention group)

• Ozone therapy for the treatment of dental caries 2004 · Cochrane All outcomes

  6 and 12 months
  No consistent trend of benefit or harm following ozone was seen across the outcome measures in any of the three studies; analyses were conducted at the lesion level (not independent of the person), so data were not…
  3 studies · 137 participants
  GRADE not reported

Digital adherence interventions vs usual care

Digital adherence interventions may leads to lower asthma exacerbations ‐ Number of people with one or more exacerbations compared with usual care (low certainty).

• Digital interventions to improve adherence to maintenance medication in asthma 2022 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  RR 0.53 [0.32, 0.91]
  6 studies · 678 participants
  Low

Videoconferencing interventions vs usual care

• Video calls for reducing social isolation and loneliness in older people: a rapid review 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  3 studies · 201 participants
  Very low

Single‐component hydration intervention vs control

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

• Interventions for preventing delirium in older people in institutional long‐term care 2019 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  Studies not reported
  No studies found

Multicomponent educational intervention vs control

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

• Interventions for preventing delirium in older people in institutional long‐term care 2019 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  Studies not reported
  No studies found