What do systematic reviews say?

Interventions for involving patients in decision‐making about their health care vs usual care

• Shared decision‐making interventions for people with mental health conditions 2022 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  4 studies · 898 participants
  Low

Interventions for involving patients in decision‐making about their health care vs usual care

It is very uncertain whether shared decision‐making interventions changes readmission (6 months or more) Rehospitalisation at 8 months after… compared with usual care (very low certainty).

• Shared decision‐making interventions for people with mental health conditions 2022 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  RR 1.06 [0.77, 1.46]
  2 studies · 249 participants
  Very low

Interventions for involving patients in decision‐making about their health care vs usual care

• Shared decision‐making interventions for people with mental health conditions 2022 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  2 studies · 133 participants
  Very low

Interventions for involving patients in decision‐making about their health care vs usual care

• Shared decision‐making interventions for people with mental health conditions 2022 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  3 studies · 534 participants
  Low

Interventions for involving patients in decision‐making about their health care vs usual care

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

• Shared decision‐making interventions for people with mental health conditions 2022 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  Studies not reported
  No studies found

Summary of findings table ‐ Structured exercise interventions vs usual care with or without sham interventions

• Exercise for acutely hospitalised older medical patients 2022 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  5 studies · 648 participants
  Low

Summary of findings table ‐ Structured exercise interventions vs usual care with or without sham interventions

• Exercise for acutely hospitalised older medical patients 2022 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  2 studies · 416 participants
  Very low

Summary of findings table ‐ Structured exercise interventions vs usual care with or without sham interventions

• Exercise for acutely hospitalised older medical patients 2022 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  1 study · 100 participants
  GRADE not reported

Summary of findings table ‐ Structured exercise interventions vs usual care with or without sham interventions

• Exercise for acutely hospitalised older medical patients 2022 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  1 study · 76 participants
  GRADE not reported

Summary of findings table ‐ Structured exercise interventions vs usual care with or without sham interventions

Summary of findings table ‐ Structured exercise interventions showed no clear difference in falls during hospitalisation compared with usual care with or without sham interventions (low certainty).

• Exercise for acutely hospitalised older medical patients 2022 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  RR 0.76 [0.23, 2.53]
  3 studies · 542 participants
  Low

Summary of findings table ‐ Structured exercise interventions vs usual care with or without sham interventions

It is very uncertain whether summary of findings table ‐ Structured exercise interventions changes medical deterioration during hospitalisation compared with usual care with or without sham interventions (very low certainty).

• Exercise for acutely hospitalised older medical patients 2022 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  RR 2.56 [0.48, 13.54]
  2 studies · 200 participants
  Very low

Summary of findings table ‐ Structured exercise interventions vs usual care with or without sham interventions

• Exercise for acutely hospitalised older medical patients 2022 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  0 studies · 0 participants
  GRADE not reported

Endovascular thrombectomy interventions vs usual care

Endovascular thrombectomy interventions leads to higher favourable functional outcome at the end of compared with standard therapy (high certainty).

• Endovascular thrombectomy and intra‐arterial interventions for acute ischaemic stroke 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  RR 1.5 [1.37, 1.63]
  18 studies · 3715 participants
  High

Endovascular thrombectomy interventions vs usual care

Endovascular thrombectomy interventions leads to lower death from all causes at the end of compared with standard therapy (high certainty).

• Endovascular thrombectomy and intra‐arterial interventions for acute ischaemic stroke 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  RR 0.85 [0.75, 0.97]
  19 studies · 3793 participants
  High

Endovascular thrombectomy interventions vs usual care

Endovascular thrombectomy interventions showed no clear difference in symptomatic intracranial haemorrhage at the end of compared with standard therapy (high certainty).

• Endovascular thrombectomy and intra‐arterial interventions for acute ischaemic stroke 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  RR 1.05 [0.72, 1.52]
  10 studies · 1752 participants
  High

Endovascular thrombectomy interventions vs usual care

Endovascular thrombectomy interventions probably leads to higher neurological status at the end of compared with standard therapy (moderate certainty).

• Endovascular thrombectomy and intra‐arterial interventions for acute ischaemic stroke 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  RR 2.03 [1.21, 3.4]
  3 studies · 334 participants
  Moderate

Endovascular thrombectomy interventions vs usual care

Endovascular thrombectomy interventions probably leads to higher degree of recanalisation (TIMI grade) compared with standard therapy (moderate certainty).

• Endovascular thrombectomy and intra‐arterial interventions for acute ischaemic stroke 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  RR 8.25 [1.63, 41.9]
  2 studies · 198 participants
  Moderate

Community professional‐led interventions vs no care

It is very uncertain whether community professional‐led interventions changes recovery from probable PTSD in children (< 1 month post… compared with no care (very low certainty).

• Primary‐level worker interventions for the care of people living with mental disorders and distress in low‐ and… 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  RR 3.93 [1.31, 11.8]
  1 study · 78 participants
  Very low

Community professional‐led interventions vs no care

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

• Primary‐level worker interventions for the care of people living with mental disorders and distress in low‐ and… 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  Studies not reported
  No studies found

Community professional‐led interventions vs no care

• Primary‐level worker interventions for the care of people living with mental disorders and distress in low‐ and… 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  3 studies · 679 participants
  Very low