Question · asked by 1 review

Interventions for involving patients in decision‐making about their health care vs usual care: Patient readmissions

It is very uncertain whether shared decision‐making interventions changes readmission (6 months or more) Rehospitalisation at 8 months after… compared with usual care (very low certainty).

What each review found

Include earlier review versions
FindingEffectStudiesGRADE certainty
Shared decision‐making interventions vs usual care
Readmission (6 months or more) Rehospitalisation at 8 months after discharge (Hamann 2006) or 12 months after discharge (Hamann 2017). · people with mental health conditions
It is very uncertain whether shared decision‐making interventions changes readmission (6 months or more) Rehospitalisation at 8 months after… compared with usual care (very low certainty).
Shared decision‐making interventions for people with mental health conditions (2022) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 1.06 [0.77, 1.46]2 studies · 249 participantsVery low

Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.

The reviews

ReviewSearched up toIncluded studiesAMSTAR 2
Shared decision‐making interventions for people with mental health conditions
2022 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
Not reportedlist not extracted yetNot assessed

Studies behind the findings

None of these reviews ties its included studies to this outcome in the data here. Cochrane reviews and reviews with headline outcomes only do not list their studies yet.

How reviews are matched to this question

Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.