Summary of findings table ‐ Structured exercise interventions vs usual care with or without sham interventions: Falls during hospitalisation
Summary of findings table ‐ Structured exercise interventions showed no clear difference in falls during hospitalisation compared with usual care with or without sham interventions (low certainty).
What each review found
Include earlier review versions| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Summary of findings table ‐ Structured exercise interventions vs usual care with or without sham interventions Falls during hospitalisation · acutely hospitalised older medical patients Summary of findings table ‐ Structured exercise interventions showed no clear difference in falls during hospitalisation compared with usual care with or without sham interventions (low certainty). Exercise for acutely hospitalised older medical patients (2022) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | RR 0.76 [0.23, 2.53] | 3 studies · 542 participants | Low |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Exercise for acutely hospitalised older medical patients 2022 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | Not reported | list not extracted yet | Not assessed |
Studies behind the findings
None of these reviews ties its included studies to this outcome in the data here. Cochrane reviews and reviews with headline outcomes only do not list their studies yet.
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.