Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

Refine by population, intervention, comparison or outcome
More filters
Evidence found and GRADE certainty

4,771 questions · 10,185 findings · 893 reviews

No studies found 2,109 · 20.7%GRADE not reported 1,125 · 11%Very low 2,279 · 22.4%Low 2,514 · 24.7%Moderate 1,709 · 16.8%High 449 · 4.4%

Ranked among the 5,000 newest matching findings; add words or filters to narrow the search.

Longer vs shorter duration of combination nicotine replacement therapy

Smoking cessation ‐ 16 weeks versus 8 weeks · people who smoke

It is very uncertain whether longer changes smoking cessation ‐ 16 weeks versus 8 weeks compared with shorter duration of combination nicotine replacement therapy (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Longer vs shorter duration of combination nicotine replacement therapy

SAEs · people who smoke

It is very uncertain whether longer changes overall SAEs ‐ 26 weeks versus 8 weeks compared with shorter duration of combination nicotine replacement therapy (very low certainty).

3 findings from 1 review

Platinum doublet vs non‐platinum therapy

Overall survival · people with advanced non‐small cell lung cancer, performance status 2 without a targetable mutation or with an unknown mutation status

Platinum doublet probably leads to lower overall survival compared with non‐platinum therapy (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Platinum doublet vs non‐platinum therapy

12‐month survival rates · people with advanced non‐small cell lung cancer, performance status 2 without a targetable mutation or with an unknown mutation status

Platinum doublet probably leads to lower 12‐month survival rates compared with non‐platinum therapy (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Platinum doublet vs non‐platinum therapy

Progression‐free survival · people with advanced non‐small cell lung cancer, performance status 2 without a targetable mutation or with an unknown mutation status

Platinum doublet probably leads to lower progression‐free survival compared with non‐platinum therapy (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Platinum doublet vs non‐platinum therapy

Tumor response rate · people with advanced non‐small cell lung cancer, performance status 2 without a targetable mutation or with an unknown mutation status

Platinum doublet probably leads to higher tumor response rate compared with non‐platinum therapy (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Platinum doublet vs non‐platinum therapy

Toxicity – anemia grade 3–5 · people with advanced non‐small cell lung cancer, performance status 2 without a targetable mutation or with an unknown mutation status

Platinum doublet showed no clear difference in toxicity – anemia grade 3–5 compared with non‐platinum therapy (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Platinum doublet vs non‐platinum therapy

Toxicity – neutropenia grade 3–5 · people with advanced non‐small cell lung cancer, performance status 2 without a targetable mutation or with an unknown mutation status

Platinum doublet may leads to higher toxicity – neutropenia grade 3–5 compared with non‐platinum therapy (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Platinum doublet vs non‐platinum therapy

Toxicity – thrombocytopenia grade 3–5 · people with advanced non‐small cell lung cancer, performance status 2 without a targetable mutation or with an unknown mutation status

Platinum doublet may leads to higher toxicity – thrombocytopenia grade 3–5 compared with non‐platinum therapy (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Immune checkpoint inhibitors vs any first‐line chemotherapy

Time to death from any cause Range of · participants with advanced or metastatic muscle invasive bladder cancer

Immune checkpoint inhibitors showed no clear difference in time to death from any cause Range of compared with any first‐line chemotherapy (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review