Intervention not reported
LDL‐cholesterol fluvastatin 20 mg/day · participants with normal or abnormal lipid profiles
1 finding from 1 review
- no estimate extracted55 studies · 9010 participantsHigh
Findings
What do systematic reviews say?
3,703 questions · 3,824 findings · 858 reviews
No studies found 573 · 15%GRADE not reported 383 · 10%Very low 993 · 26%Low 1,062 · 27.8%Moderate 614 · 16.1%High 199 · 5.2%
Intervention not reported
LDL‐cholesterol fluvastatin 40 mg/day · participants with normal or abnormal lipid profiles
1 finding from 1 review
- no estimate extracted57 studies · 3658 participantsHigh
Intervention not reported
LDL‐cholesterol fluvastatin 80 mg/day · participants with normal or abnormal lipid profiles
1 finding from 1 review
- no estimate extracted32 studies · 4928 participantsHigh
Intervention not reported
Total cholesterol fluvastatin 10 mg/day · participants with normal or abnormal lipid profiles
1 finding from 1 review
- no estimate extracted4 studies · 287 participantsHigh
Intervention not reported
Total cholesterol fluvastatin 20 mg/day · participants with normal or abnormal lipid profiles
1 finding from 1 review
- no estimate extracted50 studies · 6309 participantsHigh
Intervention not reported
Total cholesterol fluvastatin 40 mg/day · participants with normal or abnormal lipid profiles
1 finding from 1 review
- no estimate extracted55 studies · 2966 participantsHigh
Systemic corticosteroids vs placebo
Day 5 · children with acute otitis media
1 finding from 1 review
- no estimate extracted0 studies · 0 participantsGRADE not reported
Systemic corticosteroids vs placebo
Day 14 · children with acute otitis media
1 finding from 1 review
- no estimate extracted0 studies · 0 participantsGRADE not reported
Summary of findings TIVA vs inhalational maintenance of anaesthesia
Postoperative delirium (One study used DRS, three studies used CAM and in one study diagnostic tool was not reported) Time points were up to 4 days postoperatively
It is very uncertain whether summary of findings TIVA changes postoperative delirium (One study used DRS, three studies used CAM… compared with inhalational maintenance of anaesthesia (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
- Intravenous versus inhalational maintenance of anaesthesia for postoperative cognitive outcomes in elderly people… 2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes onlyOR 0.59 [0.15, 2.26]5 studies · 321 participantsVery low
Summary of findings TIVA vs inhalational maintenance of anaesthesia
Mortality at 30 days
It is very uncertain whether summary of findings TIVA changes mortality At 30 days compared with inhalational maintenance of anaesthesia (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
- Intravenous versus inhalational maintenance of anaesthesia for postoperative cognitive outcomes in elderly people… 2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes onlyOR 1.21 [0.33, 4.45]3 studies · 271 participantsVery low
Summary of findings TIVA vs inhalational maintenance of anaesthesia
Length of hospital stay
1 finding from 1 review
- Intravenous versus inhalational maintenance of anaesthesia for postoperative cognitive outcomes in elderly people… 2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes onlyno estimate extracted4 studies · 175 participantsVery low
Short‐stay unit hospitalisation vs usual care
Mortality at time point closest to 90 days · participants with internal medicine diseases and conditions
It is very uncertain whether short‐stay unit hospitalisation changes mortality at time point closest to 90 days compared with usual care (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
- Hospitalisation in short‐stay units for adults with internal medicine diseases and conditions 2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes onlyRR 0.73 [0.47, 1.15]1294 participantsVery low
Short‐stay unit hospitalisation vs usual care
Serious adverse events at time point closest to 90 days · participants with internal medicine diseases and conditions
It is very uncertain whether short‐stay unit hospitalisation changes serious adverse events at time point closest to 90 days compared with usual care (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
- Hospitalisation in short‐stay units for adults with internal medicine diseases and conditions 2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes onlyRR 0.95 [0.59, 1.54]1907 participantsVery low
Short‐stay unit hospitalisation vs usual care
Quality of life at time point closest to 90 days · participants with internal medicine diseases and conditions
1 finding from 1 review
- Hospitalisation in short‐stay units for adults with internal medicine diseases and conditions 2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes onlyno estimate extracted1029 participantsVery low
Short‐stay unit hospitalisation vs usual care
Activities of daily living · participants with internal medicine diseases and conditions
1 finding from 1 review
- Hospitalisation in short‐stay units for adults with internal medicine diseases and conditions 2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes onlyno estimate extracted569 participantsVery low
Short‐stay unit hospitalisation vs usual care
Patient readmissions · participants with internal medicine diseases and conditions
It is very uncertain whether short‐stay unit hospitalisation changes hospital readmission at time point closest to 90 days compared with usual care (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
- Hospitalisation in short‐stay units for adults with internal medicine diseases and conditions 2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes onlyRR 0.8 [0.54, 1.19]1753 participantsVery low
Short‐stay unit hospitalisation vs usual care
Non‐serious adverse events at time point closest to 90 days · participants with internal medicine diseases and conditions
1 finding from 1 review
- Hospitalisation in short‐stay units for adults with internal medicine diseases and conditions 2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes onlyno estimate extracted533 participantsVery low
Short‐stay unit hospitalisation vs usual care
Costs · participants with internal medicine diseases and conditions
1 finding from 1 review
- Hospitalisation in short‐stay units for adults with internal medicine diseases and conditions 2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes onlyno estimate extracted1433 participantsVery low
Automated monitoring systems vs usual care
30‐day mortality* · people admitted to intensive care units
It is very uncertain whether automated monitoring systems changes 30‐day mortality* compared with standard care (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
- Automated monitoring compared to standard care for the early detection of sepsis in critically ill patients 2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes onlyno estimate extractedStudies not reportedVery low
Automated monitoring systems vs usual care
Duration of ICU stay · people admitted to intensive care units
1 finding from 1 review
- Automated monitoring compared to standard care for the early detection of sepsis in critically ill patients 2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes onlyno estimate extracted1 study · 442 participantsVery low