Question · asked by 1 review
Short‐stay unit hospitalisation vs usual care: Non‐serious adverse events at time point closest to 90 days
What each review found
Include earlier review versions| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Short‐stay unit hospitalisation vs usual care Non‐serious adverse events at time point closest to 90 days · participants with internal medicine diseases and conditions Hospitalisation in short‐stay units for adults with internal medicine diseases and conditions (2018) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | no estimate extracted | 533 participants | Very low |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hospitalisation in short‐stay units for adults with internal medicine diseases and conditions 2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | Not reported | list not extracted yet | Not assessed |
Studies behind the findings
None of these reviews ties its included studies to this outcome in the data here. Cochrane reviews and reviews with headline outcomes only do not list their studies yet.
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.