Gap finder

Search review questions

Each row is one question a systematic review asked: who, what, compared with what, and which outcome, with the effect it found and how certain that is. Words match anywhere in the field.

Limit to evidence status or GRADE (optional)

5,762 questions in 263 reviews · Dental caries

current versions
No studies 321 · 5.6%Ungraded 4,450 · 77.2%Very low 455 · 7.9%Low 297 · 5.2%Moderate 200 · 3.5%High 39 · 0.7%

Ungraded means an effect was reported without a GRADE rating; it is not a gap. No studies means the review found nothing to answer the question. The six categories are a display order, not a score.

QuestionEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Selective (incomplete) or stepwise carious tissue removal (SE/SW) vs Non-selective (complete) carious tissue removal
Proportion of dentists utilizing SE/SW for deep carious lesions · Dentists managing deep carious lesions in permanent vital teeth
Understanding dentists' management of deep carious lesions in permanent teeth: a systematic review and… (2016)
Proportion (%) 53 [44, 62]9 studies · 4199 participantsUngraded
Intervention NR
Dental caries prevalence in primary teeth (cavitated lesions) · Children aged 5-6 years in Latin America and the Caribbean · Studies with data collected after 2000 (21st century), Brazil
Does the Decline in Caries Prevalence of Latin American and Caribbean Children Continue in the New Century?… (2016)
Prevalence 0.52 [0.49, 0.54]34 studies · 17874 participantsUngraded
Sodium fluoride (NaF) gel vs Not specified
Remineralisation of early enamel caries · Children with early (incipient) enamel caries
Caries remineralisation and arresting effect in children by professionally applied fluoride treatment - a… (2016)
One study using sodium fluoride gel showed a significant remineralising effect on early enamel caries.1 studyUngraded
Laser (Er:YAG, Er,Cr:YSGG, or Nd:YAG) vs Conventional mechanical caries removal (standard drill; handpiece with a bur)
Pulpal inflammation or necrosis · Children, adolescents and adults with caries in deciduous and permanent teeth (age 3.5 to 84 years) · overall (1 week to 6 months)
Lasers for caries removal in deciduous and permanent teeth (2016) · Cochrane
RR 1.29 [0.32, 5.14]4 studiesUngraded
Intervention NR
Dental caries prevalence in primary teeth (cavitated lesions) · Children aged 5-6 years in Latin America and the Caribbean · Studies with data collected after 2000 (21st century)
Does the Decline in Caries Prevalence of Latin American and Caribbean Children Continue in the New Century?… (2016)
Prevalence 0.56 [0.52, 0.59]42 studies · 26467 participantsUngraded
Laser (Er:YAG, Er,Cr:YSGG, or Nd:YAG) vs Conventional mechanical caries removal (standard drill; handpiece with a bur)
Durability of restoration · Children, adolescents and adults with caries in deciduous and permanent teeth (age 3.5 to 84 years) · 6 months follow-up
Lasers for caries removal in deciduous and permanent teeth (2016) · Cochrane
RR 2.40 [0.65, 8.77]4 studies · 236 participantsVery low
Selective or stepwise carious tissue removal vs Non-selective or complete carious tissue removal
Proportion of dentists selecting selective or stepwise removal · Dentists surveyed about deep carious lesions in permanent teeth · Schwendicke 2016 (Norway)
Understanding dentists' management of deep carious lesions in permanent teeth: a systematic review and… (2016)
Proportion (%) 99 [95, 100]1 study · 199 participantsUngraded
Intervention NR
Development of carious lesions on sealed occlusal pits and fissures · 60 months
Caries-Preventive Effect of High-Viscosity Glass Ionomer and Resin-Based Fissure Sealants on Permanent… (2016)
RD -0.07 [-0.14, -0.01]2 studiesUngraded
Dementia vs Older people without dementia
Decayed teeth · Older people with dementia
Oral health and orofacial pain in older people with dementia: a systematic review with focus on dental hard… (2016)
MEAN Without dementia 0.0 to 2.9; with dementia 0.3 to 6.0 (mean number of decayed teeth)11 studiesUngraded
30% silver diamine fluoride (SDF) vs Not specified
Arrest of dentine caries · Children with active dentine caries in primary teeth
Caries remineralisation and arresting effect in children by professionally applied fluoride treatment - a… (2016)
30% SDF was reported as an effective intervention to arrest dentine caries on primary teeth.1 studyUngraded
Laser (Er:YAG, Er,Cr:YSGG, or Nd:YAG) vs Conventional mechanical caries removal (standard drill; handpiece with a bur)
Durability of restoration · Children, adolescents and adults with caries in deciduous and permanent teeth (age 3.5 to 84 years) · 2 years follow-up
Lasers for caries removal in deciduous and permanent teeth (2016) · Cochrane
RR 0.50 [0.02, 14.60]1 studyUngraded
Laser (Er:YAG, Er,Cr:YSGG, or Nd:YAG) vs Conventional mechanical caries removal (standard drill; handpiece with a bur)
Operator preference/fatigue in operator · Children, adolescents and adults with caries in deciduous and permanent teeth (age 3.5 to 84 years)
Lasers for caries removal in deciduous and permanent teeth (2016) · Cochrane
One study (Evans 2000): 11 dental practitioners expressed a preference in 73 of 77 'dentist/patient encounters', significantly in favour of conventional drill rather than laser (P < 0.001); main difficulty with laser…1 studyUngraded
Laser (Er:YAG, Er,Cr:YSGG, or Nd:YAG) vs Conventional mechanical caries removal (standard drill; handpiece with a bur)
Caries removal (clinical) · Children, adolescents and adults with caries in deciduous and permanent teeth (age 3.5 to 84 years) · during treatment
Lasers for caries removal in deciduous and permanent teeth (2016) · Cochrane
RR 1.00 [0.99, 1.01]2 studies · 190 participantsLow
Intervention NR
Dental caries prevalence in permanent teeth (cavitated lesions) · Children aged 11-13 years in Latin America and the Caribbean · Studies with data collected after 2000 (21st century), Brazil
Does the Decline in Caries Prevalence of Latin American and Caribbean Children Continue in the New Century?… (2016)
Prevalence 0.56 [0.53, 0.60]51 studies · 87961 participantsUngraded
12% silver diamine fluoride (SDF), single (one-off) application vs Not specified
Arrest of dentine caries · Children with active dentine caries
Caries remineralisation and arresting effect in children by professionally applied fluoride treatment - a… (2016)
A one-off application of 12% SDF was found ineffective to arrest caries (Yee 2009).1 studyUngraded
Laser (Er:YAG, Er,Cr:YSGG, or Nd:YAG) vs Conventional mechanical caries removal (standard drill; handpiece with a bur)
Duration of treatment · Children, adolescents and adults with caries in deciduous and permanent teeth (age 3.5 to 84 years)
Lasers for caries removal in deciduous and permanent teeth (2016) · Cochrane
MD 0.90 [0.59, 1.21]4 studiesUngraded
Selective or stepwise carious tissue removal vs Non-selective or complete carious tissue removal
Proportion of dentists selecting selective or stepwise removal · Dentists surveyed about deep carious lesions in permanent teeth · Seale and Glickman 2007 (all 376 conference dentists; source mislabels as 'endodontists', but only 102 were endodontists)
Understanding dentists' management of deep carious lesions in permanent teeth: a systematic review and… (2016)
Proportion (%) 59 [54, 64]1 study · 376 participantsUngraded
Laser (Er:YAG, Er,Cr:YSGG, or Nd:YAG) vs Other caries removal systems (chemo-mechanical, sono-abrasion, or air-abrasion)
Outcome NR · Children, adolescents and adults with caries in deciduous and permanent teeth (age 3.5 to 84 years)
Lasers for caries removal in deciduous and permanent teeth (2016) · Cochrane
'Types of interventions' allowed comparison of laser with other caries-removal systems (chemo-mechanical, sono-abrasion, air-abrasion); no included study used such a comparator (all nine included trials compared laser…NRNo studies
Laser (Er:YAG, Er,Cr:YSGG, or Nd:YAG) vs Conventional mechanical caries removal (standard drill; handpiece with a bur)
Marginal integrity of restorations · Children, adolescents and adults with caries in deciduous and permanent teeth (age 3.5 to 84 years) · 6 months follow-up
Lasers for caries removal in deciduous and permanent teeth (2016) · Cochrane
RR 1.00 [0.21, 4.78]3 studies · 146 participantsVery low
Selective or stepwise carious tissue removal vs Non-selective or complete carious tissue removal
Proportion of dentists selecting selective or stepwise removal · Dentists surveyed about deep carious lesions in permanent teeth · Stangvaltaite 2013
Understanding dentists' management of deep carious lesions in permanent teeth: a systematic review and… (2016)
Proportion (%) 51 [44, 58]1 study · 212 participantsUngraded
Selective or stepwise carious tissue removal vs Non-selective or complete carious tissue removal
Proportion of dentists selecting selective or stepwise removal · Dentists surveyed about deep carious lesions in permanent teeth · Schwendicke 2016 (Germany)
Understanding dentists' management of deep carious lesions in permanent teeth: a systematic review and… (2016)
Proportion (%) 68 [64, 71]1 study · 622 participantsUngraded
Selective or stepwise carious tissue removal vs Non-selective or complete carious tissue removal
Proportion of dentists selecting selective or stepwise removal · Dentists surveyed about deep carious lesions in permanent teeth · Schwendicke 2013
Understanding dentists' management of deep carious lesions in permanent teeth: a systematic review and… (2016)
Proportion (%) 50 [47, 53]1 study · 799 participantsUngraded
Intervention NR
Arrest of dentine caries · 38% SDF twice-yearly vs annual application (higher arrest with twice-yearly)
Caries remineralisation and arresting effect in children by professionally applied fluoride treatment - a… (2016)
no estimate extracted1 studyUngraded
Selective or stepwise carious tissue removal vs Non-selective or complete carious tissue removal
Proportion of dentists selecting selective or stepwise removal · Dentists surveyed about deep carious lesions in permanent teeth · McBride 2010
Understanding dentists' management of deep carious lesions in permanent teeth: a systematic review and… (2016)
Proportion (%) 35 [32, 38]1 study · 812 participantsUngraded
Fluoride mouthrinse (any fluoride agent, concentration, volume, frequency or technique; swished and expectorated, not swallowed) vs Placebo or no treatment
Caries increment in deciduous (primary) teeth/surfaces (d(e/m)fs; dmf index) · Children or adolescents aged 16 years or younger at the start of the study · At least 1 year/school year
Fluoride mouthrinses for preventing dental caries in children and adolescents (2016) · Cochrane
We could not present estimates of the effect of fluoride mouthrinse on caries increment in deciduous teeth/tooth surfaces (dmf index) as no study contributed data. None of the included trials reported on caries…0 studiesNo studies
Laser (Er:YAG, Er,Cr:YSGG, or Nd:YAG) vs Conventional mechanical caries removal (standard drill; handpiece with a bur)
Recurrent (secondary) caries · Children, adolescents and adults with caries in deciduous and permanent teeth (age 3.5 to 84 years) · 6 months to 2 years follow-up
Lasers for caries removal in deciduous and permanent teeth (2016) · Cochrane
Two trials reported data on prevalence of secondary caries (Hadley 2000 at 6 months; Yazici 2010 at 2 years). No occurrence of caries was reported in either study (no events; no estimable effect).2 studiesUngraded
Laser (Er:YAG, Er,Cr:YSGG, or Nd:YAG) vs Conventional mechanical caries removal (standard drill; handpiece with a bur)
Durability of restoration · Children, adolescents and adults with caries in deciduous and permanent teeth (age 3.5 to 84 years) · 1 year follow-up
Lasers for caries removal in deciduous and permanent teeth (2016) · Cochrane
RR 1.40 [0.29, 6.78]2 studiesUngraded
Fluoride mouthrinse (any fluoride agent, concentration, volume, frequency or technique; swished and expectorated, not swallowed) vs Placebo or no treatment
Proportion of children developing one or more new caries · Children or adolescents aged 16 years or younger at the start of the study · At least 1 year/school year
Fluoride mouthrinses for preventing dental caries in children and adolescents (2016) · Cochrane
RR 0.77 [0.46, 1.29]3 studies · 1805 participantsUngraded
Fluoride mouthrinse (any fluoride agent, concentration, volume, frequency or technique; swished and expectorated, not swallowed) vs Placebo or no treatment
Mucosal irritation / oral soft tissue allergic reaction (signs of sensitivity) · Children or adolescents aged 16 years or younger at the start of the study · At least 1 year/school year
Fluoride mouthrinses for preventing dental caries in children and adolescents (2016) · Cochrane
One trial (Rugg-Gunn 1973) reported incompletely on oral soft tissue irritation/signs of sensitivity (allergic reaction): "no cases of mucosal hypersensitivity after periodical examinations of every subject". 434…1 study · 434 participantsVery low
Fluoride mouthrinse (any fluoride agent, concentration, volume, frequency or technique; swished and expectorated, not swallowed) vs Placebo or no treatment
Signs of acute toxicity during application of treatment (such as nausea/gagging/vomiting) · Children or adolescents aged 16 years or younger at the start of the study · At least 1 year/school year
Fluoride mouthrinses for preventing dental caries in children and adolescents (2016) · Cochrane
Signs of acute toxicity during application of treatment (such as nausea/gagging/vomiting): "Not reported in any studies"; "No data on signs of acute toxicity". None of the studies reported adverse acute symptoms…0 studiesNo studies
Dementia vs Older people without dementia
Filled teeth · Older people with dementia
Oral health and orofacial pain in older people with dementia: a systematic review with focus on dental hard… (2016)
MEAN Without dementia 0.7 to 25.7; with dementia 0.8 to 23.9 (mean number of filled teeth)9 studiesUngraded
High maternal allostatic load (chronic stress) and low socioeconomic status vs Lower maternal allostatic load
Child dental caries experience · Mother-child pairs
Social-Biological Interactions in Oral Disease: A 'Cells to Society' View. (2016)
no estimate extracted1 study · 1184 participantsUngraded
Laser (Er:YAG, Er,Cr:YSGG, or Nd:YAG) vs Conventional mechanical caries removal (standard drill; handpiece with a bur)
Participant preference · Children, adolescents and adults with caries in deciduous and permanent teeth (age 3.5 to 84 years)
Lasers for caries removal in deciduous and permanent teeth (2016) · Cochrane
Three studies (Evans 2000; Liu 2006; Zhang 2013) reported participants' preference for future treatment. Zhang 2013: 37/53 children (72%) preferred laser, 10 (22%) drill. Liu 2006: 36/40 (90%) preferred laser, 4 (5%)…3 studiesUngraded
Selective or stepwise carious tissue removal vs Non-selective or complete carious tissue removal
Proportion of dentists selecting selective or stepwise removal · Dentists surveyed about deep carious lesions in permanent teeth · Katz 2013
Understanding dentists' management of deep carious lesions in permanent teeth: a systematic review and… (2016)
Proportion (%) 45 [26, 55]1 study · 108 participantsUngraded
Fluoride mouthrinse (any fluoride agent, concentration, volume, frequency or technique; swished and expectorated, not swallowed) vs Placebo or no treatment
Unacceptability of treatment as measured by leaving study early (dropouts) · Children or adolescents aged 16 years or younger at the start of the study · At least 1 year/school year
Fluoride mouthrinses for preventing dental caries in children and adolescents (2016) · Cochrane
RR 1.33 [0.62, 2.83]4 studies · 1700 participantsVery low
Adhesively bonded amalgam restorations in conventional preparations utilising deliberate retention (all bonding agents) vs Traditional non‐bonded amalgam restorations
Adverse effects · Adults and adolescents with permanent posterior molar and premolar teeth suitable for Class I and II, but excluding…
Adhesively bonded versus non‐bonded amalgam restorations for dental caries (2016) · Cochrane
Adverse effects: any event for which the causal relationship between the event and the amalgam restoration is at least a reasonable possibility - not measured | See comment | See comment | Not estimable | - | See…0 studiesNo studies
Selective (incomplete) or stepwise carious tissue removal (SE/SW) vs Non-selective (complete) carious tissue removal
Barriers and facilitators of SE/SW utilization · Dentists managing deep carious lesions in permanent vital teeth
Understanding dentists' management of deep carious lesions in permanent teeth: a systematic review and… (2016)
Thematic analysis mapped to the Theoretical Domains Framework and COM-B/Behavior Change Wheel; factors span knowledge (dentists' age, understanding of caries), skills, social influence (peers, practice networks),…9 studiesUngraded
10% silver diamine fluoride (SDF) vs Glass ionomer restoration and tooth-brushing
Remineralisation of early enamel caries · Children with early enamel caries in erupting permanent first molars
Caries remineralisation and arresting effect in children by professionally applied fluoride treatment - a… (2016)
A pilot study found 10% silver diamine fluoride therapy, glass ionomer restoration, and tooth-brushing had a similar effect in remineralising early enamel caries.1 studyUngraded
Selective or stepwise carious tissue removal vs Non-selective or complete carious tissue removal
Proportion of dentists selecting selective or stepwise removal · Dentists surveyed about deep carious lesions in permanent teeth · Schwendicke 2016 (France)
Understanding dentists' management of deep carious lesions in permanent teeth: a systematic review and… (2016)
Proportion (%) 49 [45, 52]1 study · 661 participantsUngraded
Fluoride mouthrinse (any fluoride agent, concentration, volume, frequency or technique; swished and expectorated, not swallowed) vs Placebo or no treatment
Caries increment in permanent teeth: decayed, (missing) and filled teeth D(M)FT (prevented fraction) · Children or adolescents aged 16 years or younger at the start of the study · At least 1 year/school year
Fluoride mouthrinses for preventing dental caries in children and adolescents (2016) · Cochrane
PF 0.23 [0.18, 0.29]13 studies · 5105 participantsModerate
0.9% silicon tetrafluoride (SiF4) vs Not specified
Remineralisation of white spot lesions · Children with white spot lesions / early enamel caries
Caries remineralisation and arresting effect in children by professionally applied fluoride treatment - a… (2016)
One study found that silicon tetrafluoride could not remineralise white spot lesions.1 studyUngraded
6% sodium fluoride with 6% calcium fluoride varnish vs No treatment
Reversal / remineralisation of early enamel caries · Children with early enamel caries (permanent dentition)
Caries remineralisation and arresting effect in children by professionally applied fluoride treatment - a… (2016)
One study (Xhemnica 2008) reported a significant reversal of early enamel caries using 6% NaF with 6% calcium fluoride compared with no treatment; this study was excluded from the meta-analysis.1 studyUngraded
Laser (Er:YAG, Er,Cr:YSGG, or Nd:YAG) vs Conventional mechanical caries removal (standard drill; handpiece with a bur)
Marginal integrity of restorations · Children, adolescents and adults with caries in deciduous and permanent teeth (age 3.5 to 84 years) · 1 year follow-up
Lasers for caries removal in deciduous and permanent teeth (2016) · Cochrane
RR 1.59 [0.34, 7.38]2 studiesUngraded
Laser (Er:YAG, Er,Cr:YSGG, or Nd:YAG) vs Conventional mechanical caries removal (standard drill; handpiece with a bur)
Episodes of pain (moderate or high pain; six-face rating scale) · Children, adolescents and adults with caries in deciduous and permanent teeth (age 3.5 to 84 years) · during treatment
Lasers for caries removal in deciduous and permanent teeth (2016) · Cochrane
RR 0.40 [0.28, 0.57]2 studies · 143 participantsLow
Fluoride mouthrinse (any fluoride agent, concentration, volume, frequency or technique; swished and expectorated, not swallowed) vs Placebo or no treatment
Caries increment in permanent teeth: decayed, (missing) and filled tooth surfaces D(M)FS (prevented fraction) · Children or adolescents aged 16 years or younger at the start of the study · At least 1 year/school year
Fluoride mouthrinses for preventing dental caries in children and adolescents (2016) · Cochrane
PF 0.27 [0.23, 0.30]35 studies · 15305 participantsModerate
Intervention NR
Arrest of dentine caries · SDF vs glass ionomer restoration (SDF superior)
Caries remineralisation and arresting effect in children by professionally applied fluoride treatment - a… (2016)
no estimate extracted2 studiesUngraded
Low socioeconomic status and family financial stress vs Higher socioeconomic status and lower stress
Salivary cortisol, cariogenic bacterial load and dental caries · Kindergarten-age children
Social-Biological Interactions in Oral Disease: A 'Cells to Society' View. (2016)
no estimate extracted1 study · 94 participantsUngraded
Selective (incomplete) or stepwise carious tissue removal (SE/SW) vs Non-selective (complete) carious tissue removal
Temporal change in the proportion of dentists utilizing SE/SW · Dentists managing deep carious lesions in permanent vital teeth
Understanding dentists' management of deep carious lesions in permanent teeth: a systematic review and… (2016)
Meta-regression coefficient (% per year) 1.69 studies · 4199 participantsUngraded
High-viscosity glass-ionomer cement (HVGIC) fissure sealant placed by press-finger technique vs Resin-based fissure sealant
Development of carious lesions on sealed occlusal pits and fissures · Children with fully erupted permanent first molar teeth (mean age about 6 to 8 years) · 60 months
Caries-Preventive Effect of High-Viscosity Glass Ionomer and Resin-Based Fissure Sealants on Permanent… (2016)
RR 0.29 [0.09, 0.95]2 studies · 205 evaluated sealed teeth participantsUngraded
Adhesively bonded amalgam restorations in conventional preparations utilising deliberate retention (all bonding agents) vs Traditional non‐bonded amalgam restorations
Secondary caries, as diagnosed clinically · Adults and adolescents with permanent posterior molar and premolar teeth suitable for Class I and II, but excluding…
Adhesively bonded versus non‐bonded amalgam restorations for dental caries (2016) · Cochrane
Secondary caries, as diagnosed clinically - not measured | See comment | See comment | Not estimable | - | See comment | No study addressed this outcome0 studiesNo studies