Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

Refine by population, intervention, comparison or outcome
More filters
Evidence found and GRADE certainty

3,097 questions · 3,266 findings · 631 reviews

No studies found 430 · 13.2%GRADE not reported 193 · 5.9%Very low 995 · 30.5%Low 904 · 27.7%Moderate 591 · 18.1%High 153 · 4.7%

Intervention not reported

Vespid Quality of Life Questionnaire ‐ end of treatment Scale from 0 to 7, where a higher score indicates less quality of life impairment. · adults and children with a previous allergic reaction to an insect sting
1 finding from 1 review

Intervention not reported

Clinically apparent hepatitis A (high endemicity) low risk of bias Dienstag 1999 · patients with preventing hepatitis A.

The intervention leads to lower clinically apparent hepatitis A (high endemicity) low risk of bias… (high certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Intervention not reported

Clinically apparent hepatitis A (high endemicity) all included trials Dienstag 1999 · patients with preventing hepatitis A.

It is very uncertain whether the intervention changes clinically apparent hepatitis A (high endemicity) all included… (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

30 minutes of one-to-one instruction by a dental hygienist covering the relationship between sugar consumption and dental health, plus oral hygiene, fluoride and regular dental visits (a multi-intervention) vs No special instructions (control)

Mean sugar consumption (self-reported, 1 to 5 scale; higher score = more positive behaviour) · Adults newly registered at a group dental practice in a suburban Dutch village, the Netherlands
1 finding from 1 review

Antidepressants vs placebo according to any definition

Dropout ‐ Dropouts: excluding studies with high risk of bias objective · patients with cocaine abuse and dependence

Antidepressants showed no clear difference in dropout ‐ Dropouts: excluding studies with high risk of bias objective compared with placebo according to any definition (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Intervention not reported

Pain (short term) WOMAC scale from 0 to 20 points (higher is worse pain). · Patients with peripheral joint osteoarthritis
1 finding from 1 review

Intervention not reported

Function (long term) WOMAC scale from 0 to 68 points (higher is worse function). · Patients with knee osteoarthritis
1 finding from 1 review

Intervention not reported

Function (short term) WOMAC scale from 0 to 68 points (higher is worse function). · Patients with peripheral joint osteoarthritis
1 finding from 1 review

Intervention not reported

Pain (long term) WOMAC scale from 0 to 20 points (higher is worse pain). · Patients with peripheral joint osteoarthritis
1 finding from 1 review

Intervention not reported

Function (long term) WOMAC scale from 0 to 68 points (higher is worse function). · Patients with peripheral joint osteoarthritis
1 finding from 1 review

Intervention not reported

Pain (short term) WOMAC scale from 0 to 20 points (higher is worse pain). · Patients with knee osteoarthritis
1 finding from 1 review

Intervention not reported

Function (short term) WOMAC scale from 0 to 68 points (higher is worse function). · Patients with knee osteoarthritis
1 finding from 1 review

Intervention not reported

Pain (long term) WOMAC scale from 0 to 20 points (higher is worse pain). · Patients with knee osteoarthritis
1 finding from 1 review